Slashdot Mirror


Nokia Unveils OLED Phone You Control By Bending

jldailey618 writes "Nokia just unveiled an OLED smartphone that is controlled by flexing the device with both hands. By bending corners and pushing the sides inward and outward, the user can scroll, zoom, and select. 'Researchers would not discuss exactly how the processor behind the twisty screen functioned, but they did say that it would be compatible with most current operating systems.'" Reader jones_supa adds a link to The Inquirer (with video), which points out that the twist-based (rather than poke-based) interface means "you can do many basic functions such as scrolling, zooming and answering calls even while wearing mittens."

110 comments

  1. Resistive Touch Screen? by loosescrews · · Score: 1

    I thought a resistive touch screen solved that problem.

    1. Re:Resistive Touch Screen? by gstrickler · · Score: 1

      So do conductive gloves. You can buy silver coated conductive thread to make your own, or you can buy some already made.

      Although they did say "while wearing mittens", not gloves. Mittens are warmer than gloves, but you lose a lot of dexterity with them. You could still do conductive mittens, but they might be cumbersome.

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    2. Re:Resistive Touch Screen? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      so did physical buttons when they were not the size of an atom with a 8 inch screen and your phone included a decent speaker, and service that did not echo

      innovation is a bitch

    3. Re:Resistive Touch Screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't see how you could use a touch screen with a mitten unless it was a 40" screen. I don't know about you but my right hand would cover the whole screen on a phone if I was touching something on the top left corner while wearing mittens. Remember that Nokia are from a cold country. This kind of problems haunts them.

      captcha: thickest

    4. Re:Resistive Touch Screen? by LucidBeast · · Score: 1

      Please bring me my silver coated mittens James, and some Grey Popon for my caviar, I need to make a phone call!

    5. Re:Resistive Touch Screen? by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I think the number one reason I like Android is the convenience of entering my contacts into google, and they just automagically appear on my phone. That said, I really miss the reliability of my old late 90's nokia phone.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    6. Re:Resistive Touch Screen? by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      I think the number one reason I like Android is the convenience of entering my contacts into google, and they just automagically appear on my phone.

      You know Google sync supports the Exchange protocol and is freely available for all phones (all devices actually) out there since Feb 9, 2009?

      Android may have a slightly sleaker interface, but adding a contact to my gmail account automatically pushes it to my phone (which is not an android.)

    7. Re:Resistive Touch Screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see those hybrid resistive/capacitive screens being used in phones. You would get the flexibility and accuracy of resistive with the responsiveness of capacitive.

    8. Re:Resistive Touch Screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Mittens are warmer than gloves, but you lose a lot of dexterity with them."

      Agreed. By definition, you lose _all_of it.

    9. Re:Resistive Touch Screen? by mvdwege · · Score: 0

      So I should jump through hoops to get a device working for me, instead of the manufacturer fixing the obvious defect.

      Let me guess, you're an Apple fanboi?

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    10. Re:Resistive Touch Screen? by gstrickler · · Score: 1

      Your glove manufacturer didn't make your gloves conductive? That does sound like a defect.

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    11. Re:Resistive Touch Screen? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Is that really a new and exciting feature? My last three phones since about 2003 have supported syncing via bluetooth. Just put them near my computer and contacts and calendars are sync'd. The only advantage of doing it via the Internet is that it uses more battery power...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    12. Re:Resistive Touch Screen? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      fanboi

      Awe, aren't you cute. Trying to insult the trendy apple guy with your trendy insult.

      Seriously? You'd look like far less of a douche if you knew anything about what you were talking about. Using an iPhone, and indeed many android devices like it is fairly trivial with proper gloves/mittens. You do the same thing people with large fingers do, you learn to roll for accuracy. The size issue doesn't change the fact that the device always focuses on 'the center of touch', the center is now just in the middle of a larger area.

      Let me guess, you're a douche in general?

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    13. Re:Resistive Touch Screen? by loosescrews · · Score: 1

      Mittens have a thumb. I frequently use my thumb on the restive screen on my phone.

    14. Re:Resistive Touch Screen? by mvdwege · · Score: 0

      Awww, did I step on your tiny iDick?

      Here's a hint for you, stupid: I was comparing his 'use conductive mittens' with 'you're holding it wrong', not necessarily with the iPhone touch screen itself.

      But hey, I'm expecting reason from a guy who seems to enjoy being as abrasive as possible on Slashdot, so much so that his nick is an almost '-1,Troll' on sight. And that guy complains when someone is a bit rude?

      Why don't you stop being such an iPansy?

      Mart

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  2. innovation is dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee, just when you thought Apple had a monopoly on smartphone innovation and it was necessary for Google to infringe on their patents, along comes Nokia. Well, get with it, Google! It's not innovative until you've not copied it!!

    1. Re:innovation is dead? by NoobixCube · · Score: 3, Funny

      I know, right? Only Apple could ever have thought of touching things on a screen!

      --
      Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
    2. Re:innovation is dead? by justforgetme · · Score: 1

      I'm sure this flexible thing will be just a fad and a failure. Unless Apple has already patented it in which case: "Nokia you mean mean copy machines!"

      --
      -- no sig today
    3. Re:innovation is dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say the rounded corners on that phone make it PRETTY OBVIOUS that it is a stolen Apple prototype.

    4. Re:innovation is dead? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I'd say this shows the new Microsoft influence on Nokia. A pointless R&D tech demo that will never ship as a product.

    5. Re:innovation is dead? by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      Nokia has being doing that kind of innovation since long before Microsoft started eyeing the smartphone.

  3. There is only one spokesman for this phone... by phillymjs · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and if you disagree with me, you can bite my shiny metal ass!

    ~Philly

    1. Re:There is only one spokesman for this phone... by gstrickler · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points (or the copyrights), I would mod you up and/or make you richer.

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    2. Re:There is only one spokesman for this phone... by jd · · Score: 1

      Actually, I can think of two living spokesmen who'd be better. It would have been four, but John and George are dead.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  4. Wow by virb67 · · Score: 0

    This sounds like an amazing pain in the ass.

    1. Re:Wow by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Because people are flocking to buy their N9 Linux phones.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds like an amazing pain in the ass.

      I'm sure your doctor would frown upon your inserting it into your anus.

    3. Re:Wow by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

      Because the world market for phones doesn't just include the USA.

    4. Re:Wow by jbonomi · · Score: 1

      Well, his doctor's a damn prude.

  5. So, when can I buy one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So many concept models never make it out of, well, concept model status. I can think of many ways in which this concept is a failure (lack of precision, looks pretty tiring on the arm, durability issue (especially on the lithium-ion batteries!), ), but there's really no way to be sure unless I can hold one in my hands and try it.

  6. 4th Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This new twisty inferface slowed me down.

    1. Re:4th Post by crossmr · · Score: 1

      So much that you made the 6th post.

  7. nokia media campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must be part of the effort to get nokia in the news more and raise their profile. However, a bendy phone is old news, and the Samsung news is better:

    Samsung plans to release them sooner: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2395535,00.asp

    1. Re:nokia media campaign by Osgeld · · Score: 2

      none of the phones in that PR stunt were flexible, sure the screens were bent but in rigid cases .. that is because while yes you can make OLED screens that are on a flexible substrate, they shit on themselves in a blink of an eye outside of the ivory tower.

    2. Re:nokia media campaign by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      The Samsung news is more imaginary. At least the bendy phone has pics and did happen.

  8. Re:The real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it will bend.

  9. RSI by abelb · · Score: 1, Funny

    Nokia: Changing the way we bring RSI to kids.

    1. Re:RSI by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      Nokia: from full linux distro to windows smartphone edition, from optionally one-handed to mandatory two-handed operation. Next model, what`ll it be? CP/M and punch cards?

      Anyway the tech is cool, maybe as a supplementary input.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  10. The Ultimate In Planned Obsolescence... by beaverdownunder · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...you get your own customers to gradually break their phones so they inevitably have to buy new ones. Smart thinking.

    1. Re:The Ultimate In Planned Obsolescence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...you get your own customers to gradually break their phones so they inevitably have to buy new ones. Smart thinking.

      People get new phones every 2 years anyway. The 24 month contracts are actually a boon to manufacturers (but at least it allows the tech to advance fast as well.)

    2. Re:The Ultimate In Planned Obsolescence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially Nokia!

      Worst warranty service ever! Google and you will read so many horror stories it will make you wonder how they are still in business.

      Out of warranty support, ask them if you can buy replacement parts on a phone model that is 2yrs. old, and they will tell you to try amazon.com (really; I just went through this B.S. on a $500 two year old phone).

      Never will purchase a Nokia device again.

    3. Re:The Ultimate In Planned Obsolescence... by Urkki · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, I just got OTA phone software update for the... Nokia 5800XM. The phone was release in spring 2008, that is three and half years ago.

      Of course by... well, any standard, the UI is still crap, even if it's probably 10x better than it was at release, no need to comment about that. But the phone is pretty solid as a phone, considering all the manhandling it has received, such as being dropped so that the phone lock slider broke (fixed with a suitable lock app), does not drop calls etc. It (Symbian S60 5th edition, not Symbian^3, or Anna, or Belle) still seems to get some new apps, too, even though the OS is so old.

      Just out of curiosity, how's the software situation or usability of an iPhone purchaced in 2008? Can you still get apps for it from Apple's app store, even if it's just the apps you originally downloaded for it?

      What about Android devices from 2008, what's software situation with them, for real use?

      These are honest questions, because I don't really know. Also,

  11. Moving parts = wear and tear by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

    The great thing about my smartphone now is that there are no moving parts (except for the vibration motor). How many bends until the phone breaks in half?

    1. Re:Moving parts = wear and tear by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

      Oh, I forgot about the power and volume buttons, those are also moving parts. I heard the Nexus One has a problem with power buttons breaking after a year.

    2. Re:Moving parts = wear and tear by roscocoltran · · Score: 0

      What an horrible way to die for a phone: Being bent to death (with the cracks and such) by it's owner, raging at the device not reacting while it was in fact not turned on.

    3. Re:Moving parts = wear and tear by Urkki · · Score: 1

      The great thing about my smartphone now is that there are no moving parts (except for the vibration motor). How many bends until the phone breaks in half?

      Well, how many cycles of deformation does something like... car tyre take before it breaks down because of deformations?

      Or how many rotations does a car engine take before even the bearings and seals need fixing?

      Or, more electronic example, how many vibrations does a speaker take before it rips itself apart, or the connectors shake loose, or soldered joints break?

      Now many bends is a bendable phone expected to take during a lifetime of... let's say, 3 years? Compared to the above exaples, why would it be impossible to build the phone to take that many bends before breaking? It's just a design decision, which then affects price etc.

      From mechanical point of view, it's perfectly possible to build something, which allow certain amount of turning, but then not more. If you're unsure how, check out for example... car suspension. Makes travel smooth, yet takes a lot more than regular amount of force to break.

  12. two-hands control by DavMz · · Score: 2

    FTA:

    The smart phone prototype [..] has the gadget world buzzing with ideas about future products, and how exactly this product would enter the market. It is hard to imagine a phone that requires both your hands’ focus to control

    Sure, because one can operate an iphone with just one hand. Since the smartphone, it seems to me that phones that can be operated single-handedly are things of the past.

    1. Re:two-hands control by rossdee · · Score: 1

      For many years we have had technology to enable a car to be controlled by one hand (and no pedals) but it doesn't seem to have caught on.

    2. Re:two-hands control by ianezz · · Score: 1

      Uhm, perhaps it's just me, but other than when doing the pinch gesture to zoom in/out, I use my phone with one hand (a Samsung Galaxy S2). And there are other ways to zoom (albeit more awkward).

    3. Re:two-hands control by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      FTA:

      The smart phone prototype [..] has the gadget world buzzing with ideas about future products, and how exactly this product would enter the market. It is hard to imagine a phone that requires both your hands’ focus to control

      Sure, because one can operate an iphone with just one hand.

      Hmm, yes, actually one can. And I do it on a pretty regular basis. This was even an argument invoked by Apple for not making a bigger screen iPhone, because the Galaxy S II for example *cannot* be operated with one hand as the screen is too large.

      Granted, it's more comfortable with both hands but it does work and is useable with one hand. I'm sure all Android phones with a screen smaller or equal than an iPhone (Nexus one for example) can as well be operated with one hand.

    4. Re:two-hands control by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      I can operate an Evo with one hand. I also have very small hands (16.25cm from base of palm to tip of the middle finger.)

      --
      Not a sentence!
    5. Re:two-hands control by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      Like the other guy said, the Galaxy S2 can be operated with one hand. However, writing on a qwerty keyboard with one hand is far more painful than on a T9, and qwerty on a touch screen is even worse. Try doing it while walking. With actual keys you can rely on tactile feedback in addition to your eyes, with a capacitive touch screen you enter text on the mere touch of the screen. Typing on a modern touch screen demands far more attention and is far more error prone than a T9 (and no, your beloved autocorrect doesn't improve things).

      Sure, you can do it. But for some things, the touch screen is a giant leap backwards in usability.

    6. Re:two-hands control by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      I can operate an Evo with one hand. I also have very small hands (16.25cm from base of palm to tip of the middle finger.)

      Where else but on slashdot would you find someone who can on a whim state to four significant digits the length from the base of his palm to the tip of his middle finger.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    7. Re:two-hands control by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Where else would you find someone who has a vernier caliper at his computer desk? Yep, this is Slashdot.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    8. Re:two-hands control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems you have never used the swype keyboard.

    9. Re:two-hands control by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Oh no, you win! I must confess that I, too, have a caliper on my desk...

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    10. Re:two-hands control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feet aren't hands.

  13. The only way to improve... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The only way to improve on the idea of a phone that requires you to bend with BOTH hands to control it, would be if they could figure out a way to make a phone that required both hands AND a foot, or perhaps both hands and a tongue!

    1. Re:The only way to improve... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just a concept. I would think this as additional feature, screen would still have a touch screen for one hand function.

  14. Good thing people never put phones in pockets by John+Bresnahan · · Score: 1

    Good thing people never put their phones in their pockets, where they will twist in an uncontrolled an accidental way.

    I once started receiving calls from my brother every couple of minutes for a half-hour. When I answered, I could hear background noises, but he never replied to my shouts of "Hello?!?".

    It turned out that he was umpiring his kid's little league game, and every time he squatted down, he was inadvertently pressing the "Call" button, which was redialing the last number he had called (mine).

    1. Re:Good thing people never put phones in pockets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Booty called by your brother!

    2. Re:Good thing people never put phones in pockets by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Good thing people don't learn to use the key/screen lock. Otherwise your brother wouldn't call you that often ;)

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re:Good thing people never put phones in pockets by pnot · · Score: 2

      Good thing people never put their phones in their pockets, where they will twist in an uncontrolled an accidental way.

      So why couldn't a lock feature work for a bending UI, as it does for buttons and touchscreens?

    4. Re:Good thing people never put phones in pockets by zmollusc · · Score: 1

      Maybe the key/screen lock was like on my old LG, where to unlock the key/screen, all you had to do was apply pressure to the screen. Yeah, really. Someone got paid to duhsign that.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  15. Nokia - The First Phonebender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wait for M. Night Shlallalmyallan to make a crappy movie about it.

  16. Re:OLED by Thantik · · Score: 1

    fad phase? Tell that to Samsung, the largest mobile phone producer in the world who uses AMOLED screens in all of their top of the line devices. Many people won't even buy a device without an AMOLED screen anymore...

  17. wait for the Apple version by recrudescence · · Score: 1

    This looks awesome! I can't wait until Apple re-invents this, infuses magic in it, innovates, and gets it right. It will change everything. Again.

    1. Re:wait for the Apple version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      and then patent it and sue nokia for infringement

      HA! My first captcha was cellular

    2. Re:wait for the Apple version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      frankly, it looks retarded. that video shows how stupid it is to interact with a device by bending it. I hope no one else tries to copy it. It would be a waste of time and energy for something that "seems" cool but is stupid.

  18. They do realize of course by aklinux · · Score: 1

    That Apple has this copyrighted?

    1. Re:They do realize of course by fishicist · · Score: 3, Informative

      I actually have it patented. :)
      (WO2006134552) FLEXIBLE DISPLAYS AND USER INPUT MEANS THEREFOR.
      (Although I think Philips let the patent lapse, and I think they stopped doing anything about it years ago.)

  19. Its not a phone by citizenr · · Score: 3, Informative

    Its a picture frame concept. Even the booth was named "bendable DEVICE prototype", not bendable smartphone.

    --
    Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
  20. Patents... by cynop · · Score: 0

    ...hope they applied for some, before Apple gets a hold on them

  21. Single Hand usage? by cynop · · Score: 0

    Though this seems very nice, and of course impressive at first, i have to wonder how good it will work with just one hand. Seems kinda difficult to imagine. I'm more impressed by the fact that we're seeing flexible screens closer to market

  22. The filing cabinet by symbolset · · Score: 1

    In Bellevue, WA, US, there's a filing office where IP is stored. It contains the secrets of Orange, of Sendo, of others who've partnered with Microsoft on the long journey to a useful Microsoft phone. All these gave up their IP for free, under the terms that Microsoft would help them build a mobile future - but Microsoft got their IP out of receivership when the venture failed because they hand the foresight to insist on that in the contract.

    They've already racked the filing cabinets where Nokia's IP will be stored.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:The filing cabinet by Snard · · Score: 1

      Is it in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying 'Beware of the Leopard'?

      --
      - Mike
    2. Re:The filing cabinet by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      I don't remember Orange going into receivership.

  23. Wow by symbolset · · Score: 0

    Nokia is still in business. Why?

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  24. Re:Exchange? by miknix · · Score: 1

    You know Google sync supports the Exchange protocol and is freely available for all phones

    Yes but it sucks. I have my HTC Wizard syncing with Google's exchange servers and let me tell you, the Exchange protocol is utter crap. Or at least the Google's exchange implementation + WinMobile 6.5 exchange implementation combination is crap. Why? Because I can't simply create contacts in the phone or most probably the Active Sync software (the sync utility on WinMob) will prompt me with a
    "there was an error with the exchange server, all your contacts in the phone need to be deleted and re-synced again from the server."
    This is annoying! If wasn't for my phone having a qwerty keyboard and me only caring about, you know, sending messages and making phone calls, this phone would be in the garbage for a long long time..

  25. Don't see the point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Control by flexing is a pretty useless feature. But makes a great phone if water tight for use in the building trade, the military and other places where toughness matters.... that is if it is tough? :)

  26. Not the moving parts. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    And the voice coils in the speakers and microphone, the microswitches in the headphone socket, the accelerometer (you covered already), magnetometer, and for those phones with them, gyroscopes.

    All this is beside the point anyway. Smartphones are flimsy devices. The slightest fall is met with a cracked screen rendering the phone completely unusable. In some designs even something as simple as putting a case on the phone will cause some weak points to appear across the screen or (dumbest idea ever) glass back.

    My entire family has a reasonable history with phones. We've managed to break:

    iPhone 3G with a broken screen (dropped from waist height).
    Some Erricson world traveler model (resistive touchscreen stopped working one day)
    Some short wide Nokia with a qwerty keyboard ("s" key stopped working).

    But notably the ones that are still working to this day:
    Nokia 8210 (dropped from the second floor of a building. The screen is cracked and won't display anything, but the moving parts still work fine and it still makes and receives calls).
    Nokia 5110 (my favourite. There's nothing wrong with it. It has been passed through 3 family members before I got it. One of them was using it for business purposes and it was basically being used constantly from 9-5, and another psycho member used this phone to learn to touchtype while sending text messages. The mechanical moving parts have taken a hellovalot of abuse, the cases have been replaced several times due to cracks, but it still works as good as the day it was bought)

    It's not the moving parts which necessarily break. It's the cheap parts that break. Users of IBM model M keyboards will know this very well.

    1. Re:Not the moving parts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you can really consider a modern mems accelerometer or gyro as having "plain old moving parts". They're vibrating an incredibly small amount, hermetically sealed, and have operating lives > 10 years. 10 years is the target for most chips, btw.

    2. Re:Not the moving parts. by pnot · · Score: 1

      I miss my old 3310... dropped onto floors, flung across rooms, trodden on, rained on... frequently used as a bottle opener. Nothing bothered it until I accidentally dropped it into a pint of stout. Not even a 3310 will stand for that. I know people still using theirs after ten years.

      My replacement 1110 is OK, but it's too rounded to open bottles.

    3. Re:Not the moving parts. by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Nothing bothered it until I accidentally dropped it into a pint of stout. Not even a 3310 will stand for that.

      Well, my mother's Motorola from around the same time as the 3310 spent an entire night submerged in greasy water and survived just fine (after drying).

      The UI was shitty, though, even at the time.

    4. Re:Not the moving parts. by pnot · · Score: 1

      Plain old water's less of a problem since it will just evaporate over time, and grease is non-conductive -- stout is both more conductive and harder to get out of nooks and crannies, alas. Maybe lots of rinsing and patient drying would have done the trick in my case...

      It tasted a bit funny after I'd fished the phone out too.

  27. Will it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bend ?

  28. Stubborn finns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are. I know, I used to be too but got better.

  29. Cool tech by Hentes · · Score: 2

    Cool tech but from the video you could do the same by using 4 buttons at the corners.

    1. Re:Cool tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Cool tech but from the video you could do the same by using 4 buttons at the corners."

      But then it wouldn't jump back if you drop it.

  30. More like the ultimate in irate customers by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Today if you bend and break your phone and try to get a warranty replacement they'll tell you to go fish, you're not supposed to do that. The moment you make it part of the interface, there's people who will go way overboard like intense games, kids being too rough with it, have anger management issues and whatever. Even if it's built like a tank that no average person would ever wear out, there's a pretty thick tail of users who'll treat it way more roughly than everybody else. To me it sounds more like support hell than planned obsolescence heaven. If you want that then you should do it on some part you control the life time of, like say the non-replaceable battery running out, the screen fading away, no more software updates, anything you can reasonably control doesn't happen in the warranty period. This would be anything but that.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  31. Re:OLED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're on crack. OLED displays are not only less fragile and less power hungry than LCD, but the contrast ratio is far, far superior. I have never had a problem with screen burn-in on an OLED display, I don't even think it's physically possible since each subpixel is self luminating and there is no grille or anything for the burn-in to occur on. LCD, on the other hand, has massive problems with dead and stuck pixels.

  32. Re:OLED by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    OLED is the first technology we have that is actually better then CRT quality-wise. When world moved from CRT tubes to LCD in monitors, the drop in image quality was very noticeable to those of us with keen eyes.

    I just wish mass-produced 24" and above OLED monitors would get pushed down to reasonable price range soon, because I'm buying.

  33. Re:Exchange? by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

    I've been using it on my iPhone since day one and it works great.

    Remains the Windows 6.5 sucks part, but there's nothing new about it.

  34. Re:Exchange? by icebraining · · Score: 1

    Works fine with my Nokia S60 with Google Sync (which in fact uses the Exchange protocol). Never had to re-sync, even though my phone only connects once every two days or so, which means there are often multiple contacts on both ends to sync.

  35. Users beware! by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 2, Funny

    When the corners of the device are bent by the user they become rounded, and Apple can sue you!!!

  36. The thing they DIDN'T point out... by bratwiz · · Score: 1

    The thing they DIDN'T point out, of course, is that you'll need TWO (or more) hands. You can't do all that bending and twisting with one hand.

  37. Next version by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    I'm looking for a phone I can control by running over it with a truck.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    1. Re:Next version by Snard · · Score: 1

      You can control your current phone this way. Unfortunately, the only command available through this interface is "disconnect call".

      --
      - Mike
    2. Re:Next version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can control your current phone this way. Unfortunately, the only command available through this interface is "disconnect all".

      FTFY

  38. Wrong, not a phone by Evro · · Score: 1

    The thing that was demoed was not a "phone," but a bendable screen & chassis. They still need to develop bendable motherboards, processors, batteries, etc.

    --
    rooooar
    1. Re:Wrong, not a phone by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 1

      Flexible motherboards and batteries already exist.
      The screen was one of the hard ones actually.

      Processor doesn't necessarily have to bend, depending on size and position and amount of bendiness.

      --
      -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
  39. Movile porn by abuelos84 · · Score: 1

    Yeah!
    Stroke that OLED baby! Go nuts!

    --
    -- Counting backwards since 1984!
    1. Re:Movile porn by PPH · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but when I'm watching porn, mine doesn't bend any more.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  40. Windows Phone 7 Phone by PPH · · Score: 1

    Other gestures include pounding it on any hard surface or throwing it across the room.

    Future versions will include moisture sensors to detect the inevitable users' sobbing over the device.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  41. Re:Exchange? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    You're phone was broken, Sorry. At work we have an iPhone user, a blackberry user and a couple of Android users, and a WinMo user, the blackberry guy has problems due to blackberry (as you've heard in the news) the rest of us have no sync issues with Google at all.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager