Is that the worrying part? This has been reality of life for most people in the entire world outside Africa for quite a few years now, now that smartphones running Android have become ubiquitous.
That's how crunch has worked since I can remember it. If that's your criteria for not trusting software, no major software package in existence can be trusted.
That's actually one of the select few things that makes CCP apparatus act. CCP's primary concern is "societal harmony", which means that you can make your money illegally as long as you don't stand out.
This company stood out because it attracted public's attention. Which is why it shut down the site ASAP when its people realised what happened. If it was up, CCP's political apparatus would have likely moved to crush it already as the outlier that disturbed the "societal harmony". Taking the entire site down shows the CCP apparatus that company is aware of its responsibilities to the Party, the nation and its people.
If the storm on social media dies down, they will be successful. If not, CCP will likely either act to rapidly crush the company, or censor the social media, or both.
More like culprit is the cell type being manufactured being rather useless for anyone but tesla. And for any supplier, it's a very high risk venture to produce a product that is only consumed by a single company that is in a questionable financial state.
So the ambitions are probably being scaled down to match the increasingly realized risk on Panasonic's side, as all other electric vehicle majors like BYD are going for pouch cells over cylindrical ones used almost exclusively by Tesla.
Tesla has been heading toward a consumer car since it's inception.
So far, there's zero sign of them getting there. Model 3 was their attempt at making such a failure, and it ended up a luxury vehicle in terms of cost. They'll obviously keep on trying, but with failure of model 3 in this regard new try is unlikely for at least half a decade.
While it's interesting that you choose to go full racist on this one, I'm confused what is the relevance of your racist venting to my statement.
I clearly outline what ideologies are behind terrorism today. Clear cut number one is islam. Clear cut number two is marxism. Both are very visible outliers in modern terrorism, with everyone else far behind in essentially every relevant metric. And because of those two terrorism in modern world is effectively almost never an issue of race. It's an issue of ideology.
And while racists such as yourself simply cannot understand the concept of "ideology is separated from race" because to you, race is the ideology, most of the world and its people does not share your particular beliefs. Which is why IS had "brothers" from the palest of Asians to the darkest Polynesians, and from palest Caucasians to darkest Africans. Same is true for Marxist terror, which is internationalist in its core tenets. Both ideologies are pointedly agnostic on the question of race as they only require ideological conformity. So long as you're willing to kill unbelievers in the name of the Allah, you're welcome in Islamic terror ranks. So long as you're willing to kill the anti-revolutionaries in the name of the Proletariat, you're welcome in Marxist terrorist ranks.
It's likely one of the key reasons why they are as popular among those conducting terror as they are. This agnosticism increases the pool of potential recruits by a huge margin.
Marxist terrorism has the second highest victim count after islamic terrorism right now. It's obviously not as big of a terror threat as islam by a long shot, because islam is by far the most powerful driver of terrorism hence accounting for well over 90% of all terror world wide. But of all of the non-islamic terror, lion's share belongs to various Marxist organisations.
Not to mention, you'd have to kill all things that have a digestive tract. In humans, there's something like 10 times the amount of bacterial and viral cells inside us compared to our own cells. Then there are things like the benign microflora of our skin, without which opportunist pathogens become a significant problem very quickly.
It's literally a critical part of our lives. We could not exist without our microbiomes. So the question isn't "is it a cesspool of microscopic lifeforms". That's a given as humans exist in that area. The question is "is this microflora harmful to people on the station and operations there". So far, the answer seems to be "we don't know", as everything discussed has been dressed as "it might cause problems" which is the framing often used by journalist class to make things that we don't know into things that are scary and hence sell clicks and shares.
It's not actually hard to do it. In Finland, significantly higher transfers than that of ~600EUR per month occur to millions of people, in the nation of just five million. It's just that much of it is in money budgeted in services rather than just money itself. So the easy way would be "cut the budgeted services, and just give people the difference".
Effectively none of the problems are in the process of giving itself, provided nation has low corruption rates. High corruption, yes, that would hamper those efforts into effective impossibility. And none of that has anything to do with sustainability of UBI. That is simply a different topic.
The entire point of this endeavour is that you cannot have a licence for "region in EU" and segment the common market. You can only have a licence for entire market. If you have a licence for "some part of the market", you may as well not have a licence. Which means such licences will no longer sell.
I agree with you, but it's unlikely that they can be rooted in any meaningful way through WAN. At least the android TV device that I had to recently configure was so locked down, you couldn't even run apks from a hooked up flash USB memory without first fucking with it in some rather unorthodox ways. And then software package would often not work because of android TV not being quite like android.
People who actually do this kind of crime generally look for lowest hanging fruit, and massively diversified field of TVs that would likely require significant tailoring of malware for each model doesn't strike me like such a field.
Older "smart TVs" were much worse than Android TV smart TVs. Android TV is far more customizable and has a lot more software for it.
That said, having actually had to fuck wi... ahem, configure one for my parents, I ended up just giving them my old laptop to be plugged into another HDMI port and told them to just ignore the entire "smart" aspect of it. Android TV is almost as locked down as typical smart TV systems that came before it, to the point where even getting a sideloaded apk to run on it was a chore and a half. And then most of the android software wouldn't work properly anyway for a variety of reasons ranging from control interface to incredibly restricted permissions.
Honestly, just buy a cheapest TV that has a panel you want, and just plug a cheapo laptop into it and just have a wireless trackpad/trackball/similar pointer device as a "remote". You'll get all of the functionality of a "smart TV" and a lot more, without all the garbage of awful interface, ads in your face and insane restrictions on OS permissions. And it'll be a lot cheaper especially for larger models.
Pilots trained directly to civil aviation are not trained to track AoA by itself AFAIK. It's not that useful of information in an airliner, compared to things like airspeed. That is the realm almost uniquely reserved for fighter pilots who often train to fly at very rapidly changing AoA and with very high AoA limits that they need to manage not to lose too much energy and not to lose control of the aircraft. So it's an option for airlines that employ a lot of former fighter pilots and pretty much no one else.
Other pilots would find this indicator useless, as it would not be a part of their mechanical memory of how to track aircraft status in the cockpit.
AoA sensor thing is actually normal. Pretty much the only ones who pay any attention to those are the military trained pilots, who are trained to fly in a very different way from civilian pilots. So the "conflict between two AoA sensors" is an option for the airlines that utilize military pilots. And those that don't will not take it, because there's no point, as civilian training employs different scan methodologies for tracking aircraft's status.
The "retain as much as possible of the old aircraft" is the same thing. Getting certification to fly a different aircraft (type rating) means huge expenses and pilot that is gone for almost a month for training. Whereas differences training between two models of the same aircraft is just a couple of days of training. Hence Boeing made a huge effort to make 737 MAX only require minimal crew retraining from other 737 models. Civil aviation is currently going through one of the worst if not THE worst phases of lack of pilots in it's entire history. Any effort to keep pilots flying rather than spending time being retrained means significantly better profit margins for the airlines.
The fuck up here is miniscule. Problem is, in the word of aerospace, even miniscule fuckups lead to lethal crashes. People seem to have forgotten this due to remarkable safety record of modern civil aviation.
The training part was intentional. Certification for piloting a new aircraft type ("type rating" in lingvo of this field) is prohibitively expensive. Therefore Boeing made a great effort to make 737 MAX to only require "same aircraft, different model" kind of training for adapting it for other 737 certified pilots. The new anti-stall system is in fact one of the key parts of this effort, it's there to make aircraft behave more like other 737 models in spite of the fact that it had very different aerodynamic characteristics due to engines sitting in a different position.
Example of this shows on flight school sites, such as this one:
This is for NG, the previous variant of 737 but it makes a solid example. It takes 21 days to get the certification, but only 4 days to get differences training. And flight and simulator times are a small fraction as well. So this wasn't some kind of an anomaly. This was a conscious effort, and the problem appears to be the fact that this effort lead to the situation where pilots were insufficiently trained in some of the new systems and how to disengage them specifically because Boeing made those systems to be transparent to the pilot to make it easier to retrain from other 737 types. Which in turn lead to critical omissions from training programs entirely, as they were likely judged unnecessary, "since this is the aircraft designed to fly like the older 737s".
Good intention, good effort, one small miss and two crashes. Welcome to the world of aerospace, where best intentions can sometimes lead to worst outcomes.
NoScript for Firefox was castrated after XUL was dropped from Firefox. Current version is close to Chromium version when it comes to features, as limitations of the add-on models are almost identical. It is nothing like the XUL version of Firefox NoScript.
Which is why in spite of the purported "official support" of Firefox team for NoScript's developer's effort to transition from XUL to Webextensions and long and well funded effort, he had to admit failure in the end.
I'm sure the Mueller and leftist US mainsteam news media will deliver to you your salvation from evil republicans and Russians they're colluding with. Any day now.
Slashdot Mirror
FYI, Utawarerumono was on PC many years ago. Still is. It's a PC original. You can still find it on anime torrent sites.
Is that the worrying part? This has been reality of life for most people in the entire world outside Africa for quite a few years now, now that smartphones running Android have become ubiquitous.
That's how crunch has worked since I can remember it. If that's your criteria for not trusting software, no major software package in existence can be trusted.
FYI China and its companies file most copyright claims in the world by a large margin at this juncture of history.
That's actually one of the select few things that makes CCP apparatus act. CCP's primary concern is "societal harmony", which means that you can make your money illegally as long as you don't stand out.
This company stood out because it attracted public's attention. Which is why it shut down the site ASAP when its people realised what happened. If it was up, CCP's political apparatus would have likely moved to crush it already as the outlier that disturbed the "societal harmony". Taking the entire site down shows the CCP apparatus that company is aware of its responsibilities to the Party, the nation and its people.
If the storm on social media dies down, they will be successful. If not, CCP will likely either act to rapidly crush the company, or censor the social media, or both.
More like culprit is the cell type being manufactured being rather useless for anyone but tesla. And for any supplier, it's a very high risk venture to produce a product that is only consumed by a single company that is in a questionable financial state.
So the ambitions are probably being scaled down to match the increasingly realized risk on Panasonic's side, as all other electric vehicle majors like BYD are going for pouch cells over cylindrical ones used almost exclusively by Tesla.
Tesla has been heading toward a consumer car since it's inception.
So far, there's zero sign of them getting there. Model 3 was their attempt at making such a failure, and it ended up a luxury vehicle in terms of cost. They'll obviously keep on trying, but with failure of model 3 in this regard new try is unlikely for at least half a decade.
While it's interesting that you choose to go full racist on this one, I'm confused what is the relevance of your racist venting to my statement.
I clearly outline what ideologies are behind terrorism today. Clear cut number one is islam. Clear cut number two is marxism. Both are very visible outliers in modern terrorism, with everyone else far behind in essentially every relevant metric. And because of those two terrorism in modern world is effectively almost never an issue of race. It's an issue of ideology.
And while racists such as yourself simply cannot understand the concept of "ideology is separated from race" because to you, race is the ideology, most of the world and its people does not share your particular beliefs. Which is why IS had "brothers" from the palest of Asians to the darkest Polynesians, and from palest Caucasians to darkest Africans. Same is true for Marxist terror, which is internationalist in its core tenets. Both ideologies are pointedly agnostic on the question of race as they only require ideological conformity. So long as you're willing to kill unbelievers in the name of the Allah, you're welcome in Islamic terror ranks. So long as you're willing to kill the anti-revolutionaries in the name of the Proletariat, you're welcome in Marxist terrorist ranks.
It's likely one of the key reasons why they are as popular among those conducting terror as they are. This agnosticism increases the pool of potential recruits by a huge margin.
Marxist terrorism has the second highest victim count after islamic terrorism right now. It's obviously not as big of a terror threat as islam by a long shot, because islam is by far the most powerful driver of terrorism hence accounting for well over 90% of all terror world wide. But of all of the non-islamic terror, lion's share belongs to various Marxist organisations.
Not to mention, you'd have to kill all things that have a digestive tract. In humans, there's something like 10 times the amount of bacterial and viral cells inside us compared to our own cells. Then there are things like the benign microflora of our skin, without which opportunist pathogens become a significant problem very quickly.
It's literally a critical part of our lives. We could not exist without our microbiomes. So the question isn't "is it a cesspool of microscopic lifeforms". That's a given as humans exist in that area. The question is "is this microflora harmful to people on the station and operations there". So far, the answer seems to be "we don't know", as everything discussed has been dressed as "it might cause problems" which is the framing often used by journalist class to make things that we don't know into things that are scary and hence sell clicks and shares.
"Surrender peasants, because otherwise we'll slaughter you in an even more painful way".
How about no slaughter at all?
It helps to know the meanings of the words you use before you use them.
It's not actually hard to do it. In Finland, significantly higher transfers than that of ~600EUR per month occur to millions of people, in the nation of just five million. It's just that much of it is in money budgeted in services rather than just money itself. So the easy way would be "cut the budgeted services, and just give people the difference".
Effectively none of the problems are in the process of giving itself, provided nation has low corruption rates. High corruption, yes, that would hamper those efforts into effective impossibility. And none of that has anything to do with sustainability of UBI. That is simply a different topic.
The entire point of this endeavour is that you cannot have a licence for "region in EU" and segment the common market. You can only have a licence for entire market. If you have a licence for "some part of the market", you may as well not have a licence. Which means such licences will no longer sell.
I agree with you, but it's unlikely that they can be rooted in any meaningful way through WAN. At least the android TV device that I had to recently configure was so locked down, you couldn't even run apks from a hooked up flash USB memory without first fucking with it in some rather unorthodox ways. And then software package would often not work because of android TV not being quite like android.
People who actually do this kind of crime generally look for lowest hanging fruit, and massively diversified field of TVs that would likely require significant tailoring of malware for each model doesn't strike me like such a field.
Older "smart TVs" were much worse than Android TV smart TVs. Android TV is far more customizable and has a lot more software for it.
That said, having actually had to fuck wi... ahem, configure one for my parents, I ended up just giving them my old laptop to be plugged into another HDMI port and told them to just ignore the entire "smart" aspect of it. Android TV is almost as locked down as typical smart TV systems that came before it, to the point where even getting a sideloaded apk to run on it was a chore and a half. And then most of the android software wouldn't work properly anyway for a variety of reasons ranging from control interface to incredibly restricted permissions.
Honestly, just buy a cheapest TV that has a panel you want, and just plug a cheapo laptop into it and just have a wireless trackpad/trackball/similar pointer device as a "remote". You'll get all of the functionality of a "smart TV" and a lot more, without all the garbage of awful interface, ads in your face and insane restrictions on OS permissions. And it'll be a lot cheaper especially for larger models.
Android TV, not Android. It's a different OS.
Pilots trained directly to civil aviation are not trained to track AoA by itself AFAIK. It's not that useful of information in an airliner, compared to things like airspeed. That is the realm almost uniquely reserved for fighter pilots who often train to fly at very rapidly changing AoA and with very high AoA limits that they need to manage not to lose too much energy and not to lose control of the aircraft. So it's an option for airlines that employ a lot of former fighter pilots and pretty much no one else.
Other pilots would find this indicator useless, as it would not be a part of their mechanical memory of how to track aircraft status in the cockpit.
AoA sensor thing is actually normal. Pretty much the only ones who pay any attention to those are the military trained pilots, who are trained to fly in a very different way from civilian pilots. So the "conflict between two AoA sensors" is an option for the airlines that utilize military pilots. And those that don't will not take it, because there's no point, as civilian training employs different scan methodologies for tracking aircraft's status.
The "retain as much as possible of the old aircraft" is the same thing. Getting certification to fly a different aircraft (type rating) means huge expenses and pilot that is gone for almost a month for training. Whereas differences training between two models of the same aircraft is just a couple of days of training. Hence Boeing made a huge effort to make 737 MAX only require minimal crew retraining from other 737 models. Civil aviation is currently going through one of the worst if not THE worst phases of lack of pilots in it's entire history. Any effort to keep pilots flying rather than spending time being retrained means significantly better profit margins for the airlines.
The fuck up here is miniscule. Problem is, in the word of aerospace, even miniscule fuckups lead to lethal crashes. People seem to have forgotten this due to remarkable safety record of modern civil aviation.
The training part was intentional. Certification for piloting a new aircraft type ("type rating" in lingvo of this field) is prohibitively expensive. Therefore Boeing made a great effort to make 737 MAX to only require "same aircraft, different model" kind of training for adapting it for other 737 certified pilots. The new anti-stall system is in fact one of the key parts of this effort, it's there to make aircraft behave more like other 737 models in spite of the fact that it had very different aerodynamic characteristics due to engines sitting in a different position.
Example of this shows on flight school sites, such as this one:
https://panamacademy.com/boein...
This is for NG, the previous variant of 737 but it makes a solid example. It takes 21 days to get the certification, but only 4 days to get differences training. And flight and simulator times are a small fraction as well. So this wasn't some kind of an anomaly. This was a conscious effort, and the problem appears to be the fact that this effort lead to the situation where pilots were insufficiently trained in some of the new systems and how to disengage them specifically because Boeing made those systems to be transparent to the pilot to make it easier to retrain from other 737 types. Which in turn lead to critical omissions from training programs entirely, as they were likely judged unnecessary, "since this is the aircraft designed to fly like the older 737s".
Good intention, good effort, one small miss and two crashes. Welcome to the world of aerospace, where best intentions can sometimes lead to worst outcomes.
NoScript for Firefox was castrated after XUL was dropped from Firefox. Current version is close to Chromium version when it comes to features, as limitations of the add-on models are almost identical. It is nothing like the XUL version of Firefox NoScript.
Which is why in spite of the purported "official support" of Firefox team for NoScript's developer's effort to transition from XUL to Webextensions and long and well funded effort, he had to admit failure in the end.
This is a very strange question. What's my point? Did you fail to read my original post?
Or do you think it magically changed over me debunking your silliness which you sorta-kinda admitted to in your last post?
The walls are still closing in!
Any day now.
You clearly didn't, because you're still thinking I linked ADVChina because you didn't watch the video in its entirety.
I'm sure the Mueller and leftist US mainsteam news media will deliver to you your salvation from evil republicans and Russians they're colluding with. Any day now.