Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

AMD To Lay Off 10% of Global Workforce

Posted by samzenpus on from the end-of-the-line dept.

Luyseyal writes "Advanced Micro Devices Inc. slashed its global employment by 1,400 jobs Thursday as the company seeks to boost profits and re-balance its work force to pursue new product areas. This amounts to over 11% of its global workforce, including Mark Langsdorf, who often posts AMD patches to the Linux Kernel Mailing List."

8 of 224 comments (clear)

  1. Re:If they need something to do, by Fluffeh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am sure that there are many companies out there who would be more than happy to hire these folks to gain some insight into what plans are for the next few years from AMD. While cost cutting and laying off some people is never nice, certain industries that are so competitive will always be looking to hire (even bad employees) to gain access to their knowledge.

    Heck, I work in a multinational retailer (read: tough times in terms of profits and trends) and we hired a guy who works for a competitor chain in Europe without so much as an interview - even knowing it is just for a few months while his girlfiend is on study vacation out here. Sometimes the more competitive the industry, the safer the employees.

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  2. Bonus time. by RyanFenton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Expect to see EXTREMELY large executive bonuses come December.

    It is a system that makes sense in one way - shareholders simply want maximized return on money, and shareholders in amalgam play the role of idiots without an interest in future of the company willing to pay money for a stake and a vote.

    So, in return for promise of transforming the company in an idiotic direction that sounds good from the perspective of shareholder marketing, the shareholders then provide bonuses to the management.

    Thus solving the problem once and for all. ONCE AND FOR ALL.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:Bonus time. by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The ridiculous point is - nobody with any sense invests long-term any more.

      You can't invest long-term when government economic policy is swerving from side to side like a twelve year old who's emptied his Dad's liquor cabinet and then borrowed the Porsche.

    2. Re:Bonus time. by inviolet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And, "the market" applauds when the prime minister of Greece announces that no, the Greek people won't have a say in their future after all. All you have to do is turn on the news tonight, any channel from Fox to NPR to hear the economic elite talk about how pleased they are that the people won't have a say in their future.

      Not all statements are correct. Not all opinions are wise or even meaningful. Asking for economic advice from Greek citizens, more than 50% of whom are collecting a check for parasitic employment in a comically bloated public sector of a dead economy, is unlikely to yield anything useful.

      In fact, left to their own devices, most citizens (not merely Greeks) will make short-sighted short-term-pain-minimizing decisions that will eventually wreck their culture's pattern. Democracy exists as a check on tyranny, NOT as a source of omniscience.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    3. Re:Bonus time. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not all statements are correct. Not all opinions are wise or even meaningful. Asking for economic advice from Greek citizens, more than 50% of whom are collecting a check for parasitic employment in a comically bloated public sector of a dead economy, is unlikely to yield anything useful.

      OK, I noticed that yesterday and today there were two national polls taken that show if the elections were held today, the Democrats would take back the House of Representatives and Obama would be re-elected. Do you believe that the elections should be cancelled because you don't believe that decision is wise or meaningful?

      Greece is called the birthplace of democracy. Isn't it a little bit ironic that today in Greece it is announced that no, the people should not have a voice in their future because they have a stake in the outcome of the vote?

      Every one of us has a stake in the output of elections. We benefit or are hurt to varying degrees. We vote based upon our own interests.

      Should we just toss the constitution and go back to having only white male landowners vote because their vote is more "correct" and "meaningful"? Or will we have a system where people have some say in the way they are governed?

      In fact, left to their own devices, most citizens (not merely Greeks) will make short-sighted short-term-pain-minimizing decisions that will eventually wreck their culture's pattern.

      Since all corporations make "short-sighted short-term-pain-minimizing decisions that will eventually wreck their culture's pattern" then you must agree that they should not be allowed to participate in elections at any level, including financially. Especially since corporations are not citizens.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:Bonus time. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've not noticed much swerving in economic policy. The government has steadily been working to wreck the United States economy.

      For fifty years or more, we've had no immigration policy worth mentioning.
      NAFTA
      China "free trade"
      CAFTA
      outsourcing
      exporting jobs
      "work visas" freely passed around like candy at halloween, and the conditions unenforced
      rewarding illegal aliens with free college tuition
      rewarding illegal aliens with free legal counsel
      rewarding illegal aliens with free health care
      tax cuts for companies that export jobs

      Have I missed anything important? If I have, I've included enough to show that our government is NOT swerving back and forth. They are on a steady course to destroying the middle class.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    5. Re:Bonus time. by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not in the USA, but I really would like to point out that those people are already in your country. There's nothing that can be done to move them out of the country (and your economy would collapse furthur if there was anyway) so reality has to be faced and they have to get some sort of place in society. You can't close the floodgates any more than George III could when he wanted to stop the colonies expanding beyond the Appalachians. It may suck but it comes down to trying to get the best of some bad choices. The USA is far too addicted to low priced low skilled labour anyway, and while that continues there will be very little done to stop the trend at any level. Even senators have disposable servants at less than the minimum wage who can't complain or they might get deported. Making them illegal immigrants instead of just immigrants like a century ago actually makes things worse. The bottom is getting pegged lower and lower and as you say there has been a lot of deliberate destruction of the middle class as part of a race towards what looks more and more like a parody of Feudalism.

  3. Sacking developers by Tomato42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sacking one of the people responsible for good Linux performance on servers is not just stupid... it's cutting the branch which you're sitting on.