Slashdot Mirror


Occupy Flash?

mcgrew writes "CNN is reporting another Occupy movementOccupy Flash. Their aim: get rid of Flash completely. They explain: 'Why does it matter when HTML5 has clearly won the fight for the future of our web browsing? Well, as we've seen with other outdated web technologies (most notably the much-lamented Internet Explorer 6), as long as software is installed on machines, there will be a contingent of decision makers who mandate its use, and there will be a requirement of continued support, the plugin will live on, and folks will continue to develop for it.' In response, a group of Flash developers have started Occupy HTML in Flash's defense. Popcorn, anyone?"

15 of 507 comments (clear)

  1. I propose we Occupy "Occupy" by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Clearly the "Occupy" meme is being abused now. Every dipshit with any pet cause is slapping "Occupy" on it and co-opting solidarity with the OWS movement. "Occupy" is teetering on the edge of really jumping the shark here. If it goes much further, we run the risk of "Hey, remember that whole 'Occupy' fad? What was with THAT, huh?" becoming a segment on VH1's Hey, Remember The Teens? episode on 2011.

    Therefore I propose we Occupy "Occupy" before it's too late. We must stand up to those who would steal our term. Because if we don't make a stand today, tomorrow we may be faced with Twilight fans wearing "Occupy Edward" and "Occupy Jacob" t-shirts, which can only lead to nostalgic Gen-Xer's wearing lame "Occupy Empire" and "Occupy Rebellion" Star Wars shirts.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:I propose we Occupy "Occupy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can see it now, this is the start of Occupygate.

    2. Re:I propose we Occupy "Occupy" by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm Occupying my livingroom this weekend! If my wife tries to make me move, well, I won't be intimidated with threats from authority figures!

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:I propose we Occupy "Occupy" by Talderas · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's it. It's time to Occupy Slashdot.

      No longer will we idly stand by and stand for the continuation of all the Bitcoin slashvertisements!

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    4. Re:I propose we Occupy "Occupy" by arth1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Isn't it just a common mislatinization? Clearly it should be occupodes!

    5. Re:I propose we Occupy "Occupy" by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Ron Paul, a current presidential candidate for the 2012 election, has lead an
      incredibly successful life and has a Net Worth of $4.9 Million".

      "Barack Obama is the former Senator from Illinois and the 44th President of the
      United States with an estimated net worth of $10.5 million."

      Obama is only twice as rich as Ron Paul. They're both 1%ers.

  2. Unfortunate by timeOday · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the Occupy Wall Street movement is tackling an important issue, and co-opting the name for a trivial issue like this is unnecessary and unfortunate.

    1. Re:Unfortunate by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe I missed something, I was under the impression that they were protesting against the concentration of wealth into the hands of a small percentage of the population, most of whom did nothing to create that wealth. What they lack is a good solution to this problem - part of the point of the protests is to draw attention to the problem in the hope that someone will solve it.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Unfortunate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Occupy is a result of what happens when enough people get sick of their bread and circuses - they might not be able to coherently word their grievances into a manifesto but they know they're generally unhappy with the way their society is heading. It usually degenerates quickly into governments struggling to keep control with police and then military violence against civilians, and then you either have a regime change or a bloodbath or both on your hands.

    3. Re:Unfortunate by Jeng · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You cannot come up with a solution until you know what the problem is.

      If you tear down a government without a clear idea of how to rebuild it it is then likely that the rebuilt government will end up being worse than the original.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  3. Occupy elrous0 by Xest · · Score: 5, Funny

    Consider your comment occupied. I'm not even sure why, but I thought I better get in on the fad before I start to look uncool.

    It's a shit meme and anyway George Bush beat them all to it years ago with Occupy Afghanistan in 2001 and Occupy Iraq in 2003.

  4. pissing contests by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    HTML5 is not a superset of Flash.
    Flash is not a superset of HTML5.

    Get over the pissing contests and use the right tool for the job.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:pissing contests by Jonner · · Score: 5, Interesting

      HTML5 is not a superset of Flash.
      Flash is not a superset of HTML5.

      Get over the pissing contests and use the right tool for the job.

      Saying Flash is appropriate for a web site is like saying IPX/SPX are appropriate protocols for a LAN connecting to the Internet. Sure, it can be done, but it's a stupid way to do it and thankfully went away many years ago.

      The right tools to create web sites are web standards. Even Adobe agrees with that; they've actually been promoting HTML5 for a while. They're still promoting AIR for desktop apps I think. I have no interest in that, but it is apparently the right too for some people.

  5. As much as I hate flash.. by Superken7 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As much as I hate flash, you gotta admit flash existed for a reason: it filled the gaps where HTML was more lacking. Unfortunately, that's still true today even with HTML5, although the trend towards HTML5 is very obvious and clear.

    Many browsers still can't playback HTML5 properly and there isn't even a single video codec which will work consistently across browsers just like flash does, AFAIK. (I'm talking about h264 license issues, WebM's lack of hardware decoding, etc..).
    Also, while rich media solutions are certainly possible with CSS3 and javascript, it still requires significantly more effort than its flash counterparts.

    Of course, that doesn't excuse many many (many) uses where flash isn't really necessary but still being used. THAT must go. And flash video should be avoided where possible if the browser supports anything else. I think the main issue with that is that many web developers are still being lazy (hey, megavideo, I'm looking at you!).

    But flash still accomplishes some things across browsers consistently in a way that HTML5 and CSS3 still can't - or at least not effortlessly for the web developer, which is what counts most of the times; let's hope Adobe helps with that with the HTML5 tools they are building.

    So don't blame everything on flash, the standards are advancing too slowly IMHO even with backers such as Apple and Google.

  6. Adobe Flash as a Content Classifier by mmmbeer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Flash must live on! If Flash dies out then that means highly annoying and CPU-hogging advertisements will be converted into HTML5 and get around my simple flashblock. I don't like Flash as much as the next guy but when you can currently carte blanche disable flash and easily remove the most heinous of web content, I fully support its continued use.