Slashdot Mirror


High Resolution Global Topographic Map of Moon

stuckinarut writes "NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has released the highest resolution near-global topographic map of the moon ever created. From the article: '"Our new topographic view of the moon provides the dataset that lunar scientists have waited for since the Apollo era," says Mark Robinson, Principal Investigator of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera from Arizona State University in Tempe. "We can now determine slopes of all major geologic terrains on the moon at 100 meter scale. Determine how the crust has deformed, better understand impact crater mechanics, investigate the nature of volcanic features, and better plan future robotic and human missions to the moon."'"

20 of 68 comments (clear)

  1. no transformers found, I guess? by Dark+Lord+of+Ohio · · Score: 2

    merde... sacre bleu... I guess now the footprints from 1969 and other goodies are visible in HD? what about Transformers vessel(s)? Anyone have spotted anything?

    1. Re:no transformers found, I guess? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't want to see what made a 100M or larger footprint!

    2. Re:no transformers found, I guess? by ciderbrew · · Score: 2

      It would be a 100M or larger foot. Much like a smaller foot. Only BIGGER!!!!

    3. Re:no transformers found, I guess? by camperdave · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't want to see what made a 100M or larger footprint!

      I do! ... from a safe distance, of course.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:no transformers found, I guess? by Dark+Lord+of+Ohio · · Score: 2

      I don't want to see what made a 100M or larger footprint!

      I do! ... from a safe distance, of course.

      yeah, me too... armed with SAM, I guess a shotgun or rifle would not do any good...

  2. Cheese by Dondoet · · Score: 2

    This only reinforces my suspicion that the moon is indeed made of cheese.

    1. Re:Cheese by camperdave · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Speaking of cheese, is this map data going to be available on Google Moon?

      I miss the days when the Google maps folk had a sense of humour.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  3. The "Moon": A Ridiculous Liberal Myth by goldspider · · Score: 5, Funny

    It amazes me that so many allegedly "educated" people have fallen so quickly and so hard for a fraudulent fabrication of such laughable proportions. The very idea that a gigantic ball of rock happens to orbit our planet, showing itself in neat, four-week cycles -- with the same side facing us all the time -- is ludicrous. Furthermore, it is an insult to common sense and a damnable affront to intellectual honesty and integrity. That people actually believe it is evidence that the liberals have wrested the last vestiges of control of our public school system from decent, God-fearing Americans (as if any further evidence was needed! Daddy's Roommate? God Almighty!)

    Documentaries such as Enemy of the State have accurately portrayed the elaborate, byzantine network of surveillance satellites that the liberals have sent into space to spy on law-abiding Americans. Equipped with technology developed by Handgun Control, Inc., these satellites have the ability to detect firearms from hundreds of kilometers up. That's right, neighbors .. the next time you're out in the backyard exercising your Second Amendment rights, the liberals will see it! These satellites are sensitive enough to tell the difference between a Colt .45 and a .38 Special! And when they detect you with a firearm, their computers cross-reference the address to figure out your name, and then an enormous database housed at Berkeley is updated with information about you.

    Of course, this all works fine during the day, but what about at night? Even the liberals can't control the rotation of the Earth to prevent nightfall from setting in (only Joshua was able to ask for that particular favor!) That's where the "moon" comes in. Powered by nuclear reactors, the "moon" is nothing more than an enormous balloon, emitting trillions of candlepower of gun-revealing light. Piloted by key members of the liberal community, the "moon" is strategically moved across the country, pointing out those who dare to make use of their God-given rights at night!

    Yes, I know this probably sounds paranoid and preposterous, but consider this. Despite what the revisionist historians tell you, there is no mention of the "moon" anywhere in literature or historical documents -- anywhere -- before 1950. That is when it was initially launched. When President Josef Kennedy, at the State of the Union address, proclaimed "We choose to go to the moon", he may as well have said "We choose to go to the weather balloon." The subsequent faking of a "moon" landing on national TV was the first step in a long history of the erosion of our constitutional rights by leftists in this country. No longer can we hide from our government when the sun goes down.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:The "Moon": A Ridiculous Liberal Myth by Sockatume · · Score: 3, Funny

      Moon comes out, conspiracy jokes come in. Never a miscommunication.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:The "Moon": A Ridiculous Liberal Myth by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      I'm going to poop on your party here... yes, I got the joke, but

      From The Rime of the Acient Mariner
      The moving Moon went up the sky.
      And nowhere did abide;
      Softly she was going up,
      And a star or two beside-

      By Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772-1834)

                      TO THE MOON
      Art thou pale for weariness
                Of climbing heaven and gazing on the earth,
      Wandering companionless
                  Among the stars that have a different birth,
      And ever changing, like a Joyless eye
                That finds no object worth its constancy?

      By Percy Bysshe Shelley (1792-1822)

      Hey diddle diddle,
      The cat and the fiddle,
      The cow jumped over the moon;
      The little dog laughed to see such sport,
      And the dish ran away with the spoon.
      -A nursery rhyme from the 1700's

      Is the moon tired? she looks so pale
      Within her misty veil:
      She scales the sky from east to west,
      And takes no rest.
      Before the coming of the night
      The moon shows papery white;
      Before the dawning of the day
      She fades away.

      From Sing-Song by Christina Rossetti (1830-1894)

      Also, my dad was born in 1932, my mom in 1928, my grandmother in 1903. I think if there had been no moon before 1950 I would have heard about it.

      It would have been a good joke if I wasn't so damned old.

    3. Re:The "Moon": A Ridiculous Liberal Myth by otaku244 · · Score: 2

      Are you saying..."That's no moon"?

      --
      Mod me down, I shall become more off-topic than you could possibly imagine.
    4. Re:The "Moon": A Ridiculous Liberal Myth by Rary · · Score: 2

      Ahh, but you missed the important qualification that GP made when he said "(d)espite what the revisionist historians tell you".

      I ask you, have you ever seen the original handwritten version of Rime of the Ancient Mariner? No? Then how do you know the liberal revisionists didn't add that line? And have you seen Shelley's original poem, or just a copy from a textbook produced by some liberal publishing company?

      And here's the big question: how do you know your parents and grandparents aren't part of the conspiracy?

      I assure you, the conspiracy runs deeper than you or I could even imagine.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

  4. Well... by irockash · · Score: 2

    Are they sure it's a moon?

  5. Re:The Space Program is a Black Hole by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2

    NASA's budget last year was $17 BILLION! IMAGINE what we could do in our country if we repurposed it for our churches!

    Shooting churches into space is a brilliant idea. Why was this modded down?

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  6. Been looking forward to this by david.given · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have a slow-going project to render the moon using Povray. Except, because I'm awkward, I've terraformed it. There are some very slightly better (but still very poor) videos here and here.

    I'm using a monster dataset from the Kaguya spaceprobe for the terrain data, which, at maximum resolution, ends up as a 270MB 16-bit greyscale PNG file. Even so, it's only about 4 pixels per degree and, as you can tell from the videos above, the terrain is way too smooth to be interesting. I've experimented with adding algorithmic complexity with some pretty good results, and need to render the videos, but it's cripplingly slow and is, of course, cheating. [*]

    So a higher-resolution dataset is great news for me. Now I just need to figure out how to get a global DEM at the highest possible resolution, which is not easy (I can see DEMs at 64 pixels/degree, but the 256 pixels/degree data appears to be available only in tiles with odd projections).

    [*] Also, procedural code in Povray is very slow. I have been looking into rewriting the whole thing in Renderman but my model is too pathologically weird for most Renderman implementations --- I'm viewing a very, very large sphere with huge displacement shaders from very, very close up, and the open source Rendermans I've tried so far just curl up and die. Any suggestions gratefully appreciated.

    1. Re:Been looking forward to this by Sockatume · · Score: 2

      That's fascinating, I have a hard time grasping how much relief the moon has compared to the Earth (not that I have a very strong grasp of that either...) and putting water on it makes it more directly comparable. What sort of depth are you using for the oceans?

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:Been looking forward to this by david.given · · Score: 2

      2000m below 'Lunar standard sea level', i.e. what people generally consider to be altitude 0, which is a sphere 1737.4 km in radius. Take a look at the settings if you're interested. (I think it's all up-to-date in hg.) 2000m was picked arbitrarily to give a decent balance of land and sea.

      However, the moon is actually hideously lopsided, due to tidal effects caused by Earth; the near side is noticeably bigger than the far side. This makes the lunar gravitational field uneven. Therefore the surface at which water will actually settle to (which is known as a geoid) is not a sphere. Luckily, Lunar prospector mapped this shape too, so I can compensate for it. That's relatively small, a mere 100kB PNG file.

  7. I can see Alice by jbov · · Score: 2

    I guess Ralph followed through.

  8. Re:Question by sleiper · · Score: 2

    Mean Average

  9. Google Earth support in 3...2...1... by Hadlock · · Score: 2

    I remember years and years ago (mid-1990s) when someone invented a fancy algorithm to take old data (photographs + the orbit & direction they were taken from) from the moon, venus and even mars and convert them in to three-dimensional maps you could fly through with a limited degree of accuracy. I would love to look at similar terrain on the moon in Google Earth finally.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.