Evolution Of Debian Package Dependencies Resemble Predator-Prey Relationships
An anonymous reader writes "Scientists have performed an ecological analysis of software packages in the Debian GNU/Linux distribution over time; they found that dependencies can be successfully modeled as a predator-prey relationship."
In other words, "The team compiled statistics on the last three major releases".
Who's your user, program?
... is here.
2*3*3*3*3*11*251
People in Kansas know that the Debian Package Dependencies were Intelligently Designed!!!
General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
I sometimes suspect that my former marriage could have been successfully modeled as a predator/prey relationship.
I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
Yes, I see their point, but I think this has been taken further by the Debian derivatives.
There are Badgers, Lynx, Narwhals and Ocelots, ferchrissake! I hardly think that, cruel as he is, "Sid" is any kind of predator. And "Hamm"? Surely you're joking!
"Flyin' in just a sweet place,
Never been known to fail..."
If a package depends on another, one could be considered predator, and the other prey. If development slows on that which is depended on, then the predator must find new prey or face lower numbers and/or extinction.
Dammit, this other package my package depends on is just too fucking stable! It never changes! Every day it's just the same damn thing again! I need to base my package on something that's more of a moving target. Otherwise I run the risk of my own software becoming... (shudder) STABLE.
Actually, I guess sudo probably wouldn't be installed right off the bat but yes he could just su to root. running the universe as root is dangerous so he would be better off creating an adminstrator/user profile like Jesus or something and then adding Jesus to the sudoers.
if your life is such a big joke then why should I care?