Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Water Pump Destruction Not Due To SCADA Hack

Posted by Unknown on from the anonymous-not-affliated-with-yippies dept.

knifeyspooney writes "According to the Springfield State Journal-Register, the city's recent public water system failure was not caused by malicious activity. One water district trustee spoke this gem: 'First, they tell us that it's the first instance of cyber hacking in the entire world, and everyone goes nuts. Now, all of a sudden, they tell us it's not.'"

8 of 90 comments (clear)

  1. First instance? by Aryden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    say what? first instance of cyber hacking? are you suuuuuuuure about that?

  2. Manipulating the stupid masses through media. by unity100 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    simple. you tell that it is due to cyberhack. everyone goes nuts, endless number of articles spread throughout internet. then you admit that it wasnt. at this point it is now impossible to change misinformation. the misinformation spreads, public opinion is shaped. you can pass your $OPA act.

    http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2011/07/11/3265013.htm

    http://idle.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=10/07/14/1235220

    --
    Read radical news here
    1. Re:Manipulating the stupid masses through media. by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm a big fan of good evidence but if you don't read Leo Strauss and discover that a critical component of neo-conservatism is having an enemy to unite people against, then find out that an entire war launched by neo-cons that dumped billions into the pockets of neo-con friendly businesses was based on entirely fabricated evidence against the enemy, then wonder if some elements of governments might be willing to engage in extreme hoodwinking to get what they want....maybe you are in denial.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
  3. Re:So, the question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No. It was a revised statement based on new information. That's still allowed, right?

  4. Re:Y'all missed a critical paragraph in TFA by Bardwick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Watch the attempted connections to any machine on a public IP. Probably takes about 20 minutes to get an IP from every country in the world.

  5. Re:So, the question is.... by Moheeheeko · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, but we would prefer if government agencies didn't jump to outrageous conclusions before all the information is gathered.

  6. screenshots prove nothing... by FrozenFood · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As an actual control systems engineer who uses the Siemens Simatic range of PLC/HMI/Servo drives, it doesnt take a two year old who knows how torrents works to download the WinCC flex HMI programming software, throw together a few screens with some built in clipart of pumps and generators and claim he has hacked a city's water supply... or uranium plant, or Area 51 air con system..

  7. Re:Sowing the seeds of cyberwar profiteering? by Tekfactory · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well stuxnet affected Programmable logic controllers that affected centrifuges refining nuclear material. I was at a conference recently and half the talks were about stuxnet, duqu and PLCs, the show was not energy or utility industry related, but basically anything with a PLC is vulnerable to this sort of attack.

    There were a lot of folks in industry talking about how uncertain they were about how tight their air-gaps were. Stuxnet got past air-gaps anyway, but at least a lot of the industrial controls folks are talking about it now. It would have been nice if someone listened when US-CERT reported researchers were able to remotely burn out an electrical generator in 2005.