Slashdot Mirror


4.74 Degrees of Separation on Facebook

First time accepted submitter perryizgr8 writes "Facebook Data Team has taken all the friends data of everyone on Facebook and analyzed it, finding out the shortest distance between every two persons. They can now confidently say that the average degree of separation between any two humans is 4.74, not six as previously claimed by various entities."

3 of 216 comments (clear)

  1. Misrepresentation of the original research by smellsofbikes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If anyone wants to read a good analysis of the *original* six-degrees-of-separation study, Malcolm Gladwell wrote about it in The New Yorker about ten years ago. (You may wish to skip ahead to part 3.) The researchers -- and this was Stanley Milgram, of the infamous Milgram Experiment involving people's willingness to torture other people -- gave people envelopes addressed to a specific person, and told them to write their names on the envelopes then give them to someone they thought might know the addressee. When all the envelopes came through, they analyzed both the number of hops and the route. (The average was somewhere between 5 and 6 hops, with some being higher. There is no assurance this is the shortest route, but their initial estimates were 100 hops, not five.) The most interesting part was that of the envelopes that reached their destination, more than half came through just three people. It's the discussion of those people, the ones who know people in various different close-knit communities, that matters: they're the connection points.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  2. Re:Skewed Data? by meza · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Maybe I'm different from other Facebook users then, sure I have some people on my friends list that I only met once at a party and now don't even remember who they are. But in real life there are so many more people that I know casually and would say I'm "connected to" that I am not friends with on Facebook, such as: my hair dresser, my dentist, my boss, other colleagues, all the people I ever went to school with (of whom I've probably befriended less than 25% on Facebook) all the teachers I ever had, my neighbours, distant relatives, my siblings friends etc etc.

    So I think if we included everyone we know in real life the degree of separation would probably go down, not up.

  3. Re:Not exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Of course, that incredibly vague metric doesn't really explain what a degree of separation is.

    Is it just people you personally know? Or does it count:
    - people you've only met, even if you've forgotten them?
    - people you work with?
    - people you work in the same building as (regardless of whether you work for the same company)?
    - people you work in the same company as (regardless of whether you've ever met them)?
    - people you've done business with at some point (including the check-out clerk at a shop or their manager, whom you've never met)?
    - people you've passed on the street?
    - people you've ridden a bus with?
    - neighbors, whether you've ever talked to them or not? (And in how large of a radius?)

    So 6 degrees of ... whatever. You could say everyone shares only 1 degree since they've breathed the same atmosphere or you could massively increase the steps by making a "degree of separation" limited to parent-child genealogical links. It's all just lies, damn lies, and statistics anyway.