Slashdot Mirror


Stanford Researchers Invent Everlasting Battery Material

judgecorp writes "Researchers at Stanford University have invented a battery material that could allow batteries to go through 400,000 charging cycles instead of the 400 or so which today's Li-ion batteries can manage. Among the uses could be storing energy to even out the availability of renewable sources such as sun and wind." Adds a story at ExtremeTech, "The only problem is, a high-voltage cathode (-) requires a very low-voltage anode (+) — and the Stanford researchers haven’t found the right one yet; and so they haven’t actually made a battery with this new discovery."

3 of 180 comments (clear)

  1. Summary is out by an order of magnitude by Fluffeh · · Score: 5, Informative

    From TFA:

    Stanford, however, has developed a new battery electrode that can survive 40,000 charge/discharge cycles — enough for 30 years of use on the grid.

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  2. just starting.... by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 5, Informative

    and the Stanford researchers haven’t found the right one yet; and so they haven’t actually made a battery with this new discovery
    They have hypothesized an ideal, microscopic unit device that might be mass produced. They are just starting the applied research phase and may need some additional basic research

  3. Nothing special by BlueParrot · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is nothing new. Many battery technologies can last for decades. It's only the Cobalt based lithium ones that have the abysmal 2-3 year shelf-life.

    Ni-Iron batteries have demonstrated more than 50 year life, with no noticeable degradation following deep discharge.
    LiFePO has demonstrated less than 20% capacity loss over 15 years and many thousands of cycles.
    Ni-Hydrogen has been in service without maintenance on satellites for many many years. The batteries on the Hubble went 19 years without servicing.
    Lead-Acid requires a bit of servicing and maintenance, but they can also last more than a decade when properly cared for.

    Now when it comes to energy storage to deal with renewables the problem is the shear amount of energy storage needed as well as energy lost to inefficiency. The technology exists, but the cost would be prohibitive.