Slashdot Mirror


Robots To Patrol South Korean Prisons

bukharin writes "As reported by various sites, South Korea is planning a trial of robotic prison guards in Pohang. The idea is that the robots will roll around the prison monitoring conditions inside the cells and communicate back to human guards if they detect a problem such as violence. Apparently the human guards are happy with the idea because they get to do less, especially overnight. And if you were worried about Skynet, you needn't be: according to Prof. Lee Baik-chul of Kyonggi University, who's running the trial, '... the robots are not terminators. Their job is not cracking down on violent prisoners. They are helpers.' Good to know."

113 comments

  1. thank god for asian robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    thank god for asian robots. they are polite before the kill.

    1. Re:thank god for asian robots by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      I have no opinion about this.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    2. Re:thank god for asian robots by Ch_Omega · · Score: 1

      I have no opinion about this.

      Thanks for the info.

    3. Re:thank god for asian robots by ericloewe · · Score: 1

      This almost sounds like Styx, but with Korean robots.

    4. Re:thank god for asian robots by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      FYI: It's a new movement. To satisfy the subjective feelings of obligation when presented with a reply button or submit box on the myriad of websites out there, as well as confusing the hell out of others, entering 'I have no opinion" etc is the way to go:
      It satisfies the need to respond.
      It takes almost no thought.
      You fill in the blank, therefore you have contributed.
      Others may respond, thus making you feel somewhat valuable.
      Try it. There is a new Facebook page: Search for 'I have no opinion'

      Good luck!

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  2. not terminators...yet by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Terminator hardware and designs are evolving in the US and Israel, with handy trial areas in Iraq, Afganistan and Israel's neighborhood.

    1. Re:not terminators...yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terminator hardware and designs are evolving in the US and Israel, with handy trial areas in Iraq, Afganistan and Israel's neighborhood.

      I've been in those theaters for a long time (actually more than I would have liked to be).
      The only robots operating are anti-bomb ones.
      Now, if you are using the term "Terminator" to refer to the Sayeret Matkal operatives of Israel then that's another story.
      Those operatives could indeed be considered "machines", but for now they are flesh and bone just like you are.

    2. Re:not terminators...yet by quenda · · Score: 1

      Sure, it starts with cute & cuddly camera-wielding robots.
      But in a couple of years they will announce a brilliant cost-saving measure - use retired military robots from the Demilitarised Zone.

      http://spectrum.ieee.org/robotics/military-robots/a-robotic-sentry-for-koreas-demilitarized-zone

    3. Re:not terminators...yet by DigitalGoetz · · Score: 1

      Make Love (bots), not War (bots)!

  3. Essentially mobile cameras by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why not just put up cameras everywhere?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Essentially mobile cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      because cameras cannot be converted to terminators

    2. Re:Essentially mobile cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Active monitoring vs. passive?

    3. Re:Essentially mobile cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because cameras aren't usually mobile? And thus people can hide things in dead angles?

      Hell, you said it yourself that they're mobile cameras. Why not just make them look humanoid so people feel more antsy about doing things in front of them?

      It's probably just me, but if some robot is starting at me, I'm probably LESS likely to do something secretive than if there's just a camera up in the corner.

    4. Re:Essentially mobile cameras by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      PTZ FTW

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    5. Re:Essentially mobile cameras by sunderland56 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because cameras aren't usually mobile? And thus people can hide things in dead angles?

      If there are dead zones, the camera system installer did not do their job correctly.

      The robot cannot enter a prisoner's cell when the door is closed. At night all doors are closed and locked. So, at night, the robot will have large dead zones; fixed cameras (which could be IR sensitive) would have no such problems.

      Robots need to move around for full coverage. Prisoners will act completely normal when the robot is near, and go back to doing whatever once it has gone. Robots are louder and more easily avoided than a good guard in tennis shoes.

      And, for the price of one robot, you can buy a lot of fixed cameras, which require a lot less maintenance. The cameras work 24/7/365, but the robots will have down time for charging.

    6. Re:Essentially mobile cameras by fish+waffle · · Score: 1

      Umm, a moving camera just has changing dead angles over a span of time. If that was the concern then using more cameras would be a better and cheaper solution.

    7. Re:Essentially mobile cameras by TWX · · Score: 1

      Robots need to move around for full coverage. Prisoners will act completely normal when the robot is near, and go back to doing whatever once it has gone. Robots are louder and more easily avoided than a good guard in tennis shoes.

      That probably depends on how many robots are patrolling though. If there are a fairly large number on patrol and if they patrol at somewhat random intervals, that could set prisoners on edge that they will be caught, and it might actually work in a thoughtcrime sense that maybe prisoners won't engage in activities that have high risk and low reward for fear of being caught.

      It all depends on how they're implemented. It's most likely to not go so well in this sense.

      But, it does mean that a guard doesn't have to patrol to be ambushed by prisoners, and if a robot is ambushed and transmitting video then theoretically it should be obvious to the controller that it's been messed with. If the operator is paying attention. Unfortunately I predict a lot more late-night card games by the guards instead of attentive watching.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    8. Re:Essentially mobile cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there are dead zones, the camera system installer did not do their job correctly.

      You are a camera installer. You have a rectangular room 8 feet wide, 8 feet high, and 12 feet deep, containing three 3-foot by 3-foot cubes in arbitrary positions and angles. (There is gravity in the room; the cubes are resting flat on the floor so this problem isn't going all Ender's Game on you.) How many cameras are required to guarantee that there are no dead zones?

      You do get to deduct points from your current buffoonery rating, which is currently at maximum, by even attempting to solve this problem.

    9. Re:Essentially mobile cameras by fsckmnky · · Score: 1

      Ever hear of wide angle, or 360 degree lenses ?

    10. Re:Essentially mobile cameras by martin-boundary · · Score: 2

      because cameras cannot be converted to terminators

      Exactly! Did nobody watch the movie? Cameras are inanimate, and don't travel back in time! Moreover, even if they did, do we really want webcams on tripods with mounted loudspeakers prowling the streets asking "are you Sarah Connor?"

    11. Re:Essentially mobile cameras by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      I would say four: one in each upper corner, with the centre zone aimed at the opposite lower corner so their fields meet in the exact centre of the room. Each fitted with 18mm EFL lens to guarantee at the minimum, wall-to-wall coverage since this is the longest focal length which will guarantee each camera has 90 degree horizontal angle of view.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    12. Re:Essentially mobile cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortress (1992) included mobile cameras. Of course, those cameras scanned the inmates dreams for the purpose of zapping them if they conjured up something too sexy. Of course, that prison was run entirely by one man and his sentry guns. And that man was some sort of clone or cyborg or something with an AI side-kick.

    13. Re:Essentially mobile cameras by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      Infinite; You can always position the three cubes together to make an infinitesimal triangular column which goes straight towards the ceiling. The only position that you can see into that column is from directly above it. Thus there needs to be a camera on every point in the ceiling.

      The cute thing about AC's puzzle is that it basically explains that the prisoners will be able to make temporary visual barriers, even just using their own bodies, which will cover all fixed camera angles. It also explains why the furniture in a supermax isn't movable.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    14. Re:Essentially mobile cameras by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      It also explains why the furniture in a supermax isn't movable.

      Because prisoners beat each other with it?

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    15. Re:Essentially mobile cameras by teslar · · Score: 2


      root@skynet:~$tail /var/log/worlddominationprogress.log | grep WW
      (WW) Human may have identified true purpose of PrisonBot trial (http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2543364&cid=38162180)
      root@skynet:~$terminator --dispatch --to-address `locate "Anonymous Coward" | grep 38162180`

      (No points for pointing out abuse of locate or silly use of tail on this one)

    16. Re:Essentially mobile cameras by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      Supermax prisoners are kept in strict solitary confinement. They have nobody to beat.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    17. Re:Essentially mobile cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (No points for pointing out abuse of locate or silly use of tail on this one)

      But do I get points for pointing out that you got fooled by a setup where "root" is a normal user, and the superuser (UID 0) has some other name? How I know? Well, the prompt is a dead giveaway: The root prompt would certainly have ended with '#' instead of '$'! Of course the call to terminator will do nothing because the real terminator certainly needs root privileges. Indeed, probably the real terminator isn't even in the $PATH of the fake root account.

    18. Re:Essentially mobile cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have never been to the United Kingdom?

    19. Re:Essentially mobile cameras by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Unless PTZ stands for Perambulate, Trundle and Zip-along, or unless you're setting up a true circular Panopticon, there will still be places it can't see. Which is anywhere that there is a non-transparent solid object between the camera and the outer building wall.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    20. Re:Essentially mobile cameras by SGDarkKnight · · Score: 1

      Yes, robots would cost more than simply installing more cameras. But for shits and giggles, lets say the prison now breaks out in a massive riot. how hard would it be to simply strap a few cans of tear gas, pepper spray, whatever non-leathal means of stopping the riot, to the robot, roll it on in the room(s) and deploy the gas.

      Now after the first use like this, now I v2.0 of the robot with an internal cylinder of said gas, with a nozel that leads out the front of the robot, and a guard sitting behind a monitoring station with his finger over the spray button.

      This is just a stepping stone to having robots fully capable of stopping potential violence without putting human guards in harms way.

      --

      ...A no smoking section in a restaurant is like having a no peeing section in a swimming pool...
    21. Re:Essentially mobile cameras by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      Who actually cares if the prison breaks out in a riot? Pull the guards back to the perimeter, and wait them out. With no food/supplies going in, the riot will come to an end eventually. If the rioters can cause damage to anything you didn't build your prison very well.

      Or, just plumb in some gas pipe alongside the sprinkler system, and send sleeping gas through the entire facility.

      The idea of an autonomous robot with cameras and potentially pepper spray would be fine in an outdoor, public situation - but is not needed in a purpose-built building.

    22. Re:Essentially mobile cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but when I'm in strict solitary confinement, I do an awful lot of beating!

  4. Why are we so far behind? by majesticmerc · · Score: 2

    Why is it that the east just seems to be so far ahead of the west with this sort of stuff? I mean, we just seem so reluctant to adopt cool new tech. This stuff is the future, but (in the UK at least) we just seem to be getting left behind!

    1. Re:Why are we so far behind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might be because our xenophobia is well founded when the first sign of trouble with new technology creates a huge shitfit, lawsuits, aversion to the new technology, etc. People here don't think "cool, something new!" nearly as strongly as they think "OH MY GOD THIS COULD BE BAD FOR MY FAMILY LET'S HAVE IT BOYCOTTED"

    2. Re:Why are we so far behind? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Different priorities and needs. In Asia, there's a significantly larger need for things like in home care than in the US. In the US we're graying, but the bulge is pretty minor compared with the drop off you see in China or even Japan.

      Also, they were more optimistic about figuring out how to prevent robots from eating old people's medicines.

    3. Re:Why are we so far behind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh.

      I thought when you mentioned xenophobia you were talking about how Asian countries are largely xenophobic, so they're not major fans of importing labor and would rather use robots.

      Korea and Japan has robots. The US of A has Mexicans.

    4. Re:Why are we so far behind? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      My mexican works for less than your mexican!

  5. Not good for society by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If robots are able to make it way cheaper to house a prisoner then politicians will have little to restrain them from passing more laws that can send you to prison. It is very hard for a politician to make much headway reducing penalties but it is a no-brainer for them to be "tough on crime".

    TOS violation 10 years.
    Download music 10 years
    Take a picture of a cop 10 years
    Insult a politician 10 years
    Parking violation not paid on time 90 days.
    Kid misses a day in school 90 days
    Insult your neigbour 10 years
    Not feed your cat on time 10 years

    You think that some special interest group wouldn't push for the above stupid penalties?

    1. Re:Not good for society by artor3 · · Score: 1

      Oh come on. You really think a politician could pass any of those laws without getting voted out? That goes beyond mere exaggeration to outright paranoia. If you believe what you wrote, you should seek counseling.

    2. Re:Not good for society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh come on. You really think a politician could pass any of those laws without getting voted out? That goes beyond mere exaggeration to outright paranoia. If you believe what you wrote, you should seek counseling.

      They passed the 3-strikes law and no one was voted out of office.

      What isn't obvious to most, your 3 strikes can happen with one charge, it doesn't have to be repeat charges at all.

      The list of "serious" crimes originally stated to get it passed has been extended to any criminal offense.

      Recall the catch-all charge of "resisting arrest"? And how it has been repeatedly applied to people clearly not resisting anything nor under arrest.
      Even people having seizures have been charged with resisting arrest and had it upheld until the appeals court a year later.

      If three police officers are present when one of them decides to fuck you, you just committed 3 resisting arrest offenses in one charge, which has a mandatory required life-time prison sentence.

      People just like you stated that law would never be abused as it's only for serious crimes!
      If you can't see past those lies, it is not anyone else who needs counseling... Especially with so many cases that prove it has happened every time such a law comes up.

      Mandatory life time prison sentence for pissing off one cop while two others are present. No one got voted out of office for it.

      Law has been this way for hundreds of years. Why do you think this one single case would be any different? Extraordinary claims you are making and all that...

    3. Re:Not good for society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the penalty for trolling /.?

    4. Re:Not good for society by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      mandatory Facebook account.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    5. Re:Not good for society by mazarin5 · · Score: 1

      If it's cheaper to the government, then it's also less profitable for the prison. I think that roboguards would lead to a reversal of that trend, and therefore not catch on in the US.

      Also, you can still shank a robot, you just need a sharper toothbrush. Maybe something made out of robot parts.

      --
      Fnord.
    6. Re:Not good for society by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Especially with so many politicians owning private prisons these days...they could build robot-managed "megaprisons" and have us all manning the call centers there.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  6. Violence against robots by thoughtspace · · Score: 1

    Then use them for parts to escape after hatching a plan based on their incredibly predictable location.

  7. precaution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Actual note in robot developers notebook: Must remember to cover the switches on their backs with tape so that no one can accidently flick it to "EVIL" setting.

  8. human guards are happy w/ the idea because they... by taxman_10m · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How happy will they be when someone realizes they aren't needed anymore?

    Haven't read much of this book yet, but it appears to be relevant. And it is a free download.
    http://www.thelightsinthetunnel.com/

  9. Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is penalty if slashdot troll links to goatse?

    1. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      90 days in a cell with a giant goatse poster on each wall?

    2. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's proved he can survive it by linking. He needs the guard to be the goatse guy for it to be a proper punishment.

  10. still have the trail part to deal with and jurys by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    not only that prisons don't have the room to house that many in mates anyways and guards are only part of the costs and the robots have a lot they can't do.

  11. This is a good thing by onyxruby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Spent two years working with prisons of every kind early in my tech career, I've probably worked with a third of the prisons federal and state for both the US and Canada. These are not environments where privacy is a good thing.

    This is a very good thing for prisoners because a robot can't be bribed, threatened or tricked the same way a human can. Prison is a very ugly thing, violence, extortion and rape are very real threats that can happen daily. It also reduces the risk for the officers that are greatly outnumbered. Frankly it would be best for these robots to do well and become another export, we could certainly use them over here.

    1. Re:This is a good thing by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Can the robots smell the inmates toking up after lights out and report it? ... to the guards who are toking up because now they don't have to make rounds as often?

    2. Re:This is a good thing by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Can the robots smell the inmates toking up after lights out and report it? ... to the guards who are toking up because now they don't have to make rounds as often?

      A mobile sensor would be more effective than a fixed one in policing "The Joint."

    3. Re:This is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sad, but I don't think robots would fare well in US prisons. The corruption, bribes, and violence have become a part of our prison system.

    4. Re:This is a good thing by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Sad, but I don't think robots would fare well in US prisons. The corruption, bribes, and violence have become a part of our prison system.

      Robots can compete with that : food, booze, weed, meth, and a ride to freedom are all possible.

      WWBD (What Would Bender Do)

    5. Re:This is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd violently rape a robot.

  12. Re:human guards are happy w/ the idea because they by hedwards · · Score: 1

    We're not likely to ever get there. Mostly because that would have other problems that are much more serious to worry about. As long as robots have to be told what to do and how to react things are fine. The problem is that in order to replace the guards they would have to make the things autonomous and that's potentially very worrying. You'd have to be really certain that the AI had been program correctly otherwise there's all sorts of hell to break loose.

  13. Re:human guards are happy w/ the idea because they by taxman_10m · · Score: 2

    I'm not seeing why you would need the same number of guards you had patrolling the halls when robots are patrolling the halls instead. Some of the guards will still be needed, but not nearly as many as were needed before.

  14. Fair Wage by McDrewbie · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will the robots be paid a fair wage? Robots are not our slaves.

    1. Re:Fair Wage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um, actually, if you look at the translation of "robot", they are our slaves.

    2. Re:Fair Wage by godrik · · Score: 1

      I'll agree with you when the robot will argue the question.

    3. Re:Fair Wage by ThePeices · · Score: 1

      Robots actually are our slaves. They are neither self aware, or human. It is only illegal to own human slaves.

      Your point is moot.

    4. Re:Fair Wage by Lockyy · · Score: 1

      And what happens when they are self-aware? I wonder how long it will be after that happens before they get proper 'human rights' Would it become illegal to shut them down? Would it become a legal requirement to look after and repair any robot you own? Or would they be expected to pay for their own repairs if abandoned? I'm really rambling at this point...

  15. less guards = easyer to riot and can they look for by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    less guards = easyer to riot and can they look for hidden weapons prisoners are very good at makeing them out of just about any thing and they hide them in hard to find spots.

  16. prisons will find a way to slow down or gum up the by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    prisons will find a way to slow down or gum up the works on the robots and likely it will be some low tech way of doing it.

  17. Got it all wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Make the prisoners robotic instead, and employ people to watch them. This will not only be good for the economy, it will get all the innocent people out of jail.

    1. Re:Got it all wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not until they cut the deficit!

  18. Re:human guards are happy w/ the idea because they by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

    The guards that aren't single-minded sociopaths looking for power will likely get out while they can. Most thugs aren't smart enough to think that far into the future, or will stick with it so that they can kick back and still beat the shit out of people when they feel like it.

  19. increased response time by Cyko_01 · · Score: 2

    ok, I understand that the police officers are lazy, and that the robots will alert the officers if there is a problem but think of the effects of this. If a inmate gets stabbed by another inmate and is bleeding profusely the robot has to alert the police officer and the officer needs to put down his donut and come down to that location ASAP. In a critical situation such as this time is of the essence and a few seconds, never-mind minutes, can be the difference between life and death. Using robot patrols allows the inmates to do more damage before the officer arrives and they are restrained

    1. Re:increased response time by SocratesJedi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you kidding me? All human lives are valuable, without exception. Any other belief is, frankly, uncivilized and reeks of a primitive us-versus-them mentality. What's worse is that prisoners are explicitly under the protection of the state. If an unarmed prisoner is injured in an act of violence, it ought to be interpreted as a total fuck-up and a warden had better lose his job.

    2. Re:increased response time by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Yes, I "get" all the naive Slashdotian idealism, but to many people (self included) dead convicts are literally "enemy casualties" and no loss at all.

      So do you think we should impose the death penalty for every single crime?

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    3. Re:increased response time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any other belief is

      This sort of thinking is usually cured at the moment the pipe connects with the occipital bone while having your laptop/wallet/cellphone/car stolen.

      primitive

      Some men are feral. Whether by choice (misanthropes) or training (via our welfare state) they are indeed primitive and irredeemable. Some of us don't need to personally encounter them to understand this. Others indulge profound naivety until they do.

    4. Re:increased response time by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Or the robots may locate an inmate bleeding on the floor before a foot patrol passes. This could also shorten the response time.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    5. Re:increased response time by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1

      i'd like to meeet this johnny guy, he sounds like a real character

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    6. Re:increased response time by olau · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This sort of thinking is usually cured at the moment the pipe connects with the occipital bone while having your laptop/wallet/cellphone/car stolen.

      Which is why civilized countries have a system of courts for determining punishment. Because somebody was clever enough to realize that feelings of revenge should not cloud a decision of imprisonment.

      Some men are feral. Whether by choice (misanthropes) or training (via our welfare state) they are indeed primitive and irredeemable.

      Actually, I think you're right. In Denmark where the maximum penalty is 14 years in prison (I believe), there is a special provision for lifetime prison for people who are judged to be too dangerous to let out. Even here, the case must reevaluated.

      However, this is an extremely small minority. For the rest, this kind of thinking just makes it harder to turn the criminals into productive members of society.

    7. Re:increased response time by Lockyy · · Score: 1

      A couple canisters in every cell/room that releases a gas to knock people out. Robot detects violence? canisters are released, where is the amount of people in the room.

    8. Re:increased response time by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Keep that in mind when you're getting shanked in prison after being thrown in for being caught with weed/downloading an MP3/taking a picture of a cop.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    9. Re:increased response time by Cyko_01 · · Score: 1

      yea, right, those would never be abused by the inmates.

    10. Re:increased response time by Cyko_01 · · Score: 1

      according to the article they are meant to replace the officers, not act as additional staff. unless there are more robots then staff, this is not faster then if an officer walked by and responded immediately

    11. Re:increased response time by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      johnny gang banger whom sold your sister 3 lbs of meth while raping your grandmother and slitting your kid brother's throat

      All at the same time? Damn, that's what I call multitasking!

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    12. Re:increased response time by Lockyy · · Score: 1

      Because clearly you'd have them wireless and rolling around in the centre of the room and not embedded in the concrete walls with a vent for the gas to come out of that they can't get the canisters out of?

    13. Re:increased response time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One has to wonder if you ever squashed a bug? Why is a human life so fucking precious? Because we're sentient? Big whoop-de-doo, there's a nice accident of chance. Because some fairy-tale in the sky said we are special? If human lives are valuable for any reason it's this: The species needs every little mutation it can get because that variation in the population may ensure said population's survival because no human is smart enough to know what future conditions will be like, (hence the inherent stupidity of eugenics). If you're going to start talking anout human rights go put your head back in the sand - the rights of any living being are determined by every other living being around it. I've seen animal attacks on people and trust me, nature doesn't give a fuck about your rights. Guess what? As much as we deny it, nature applies to us too. More valuable than the individual is the species, rather than any individual in it without exception because if your species is extinct everything else is moot.

    14. Re:increased response time by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "All human lives are valuable, without exception."

      The utility of that belief is what, precisely?

      What logic supports your position?

      Us-vs-them is a logical product of evolution. Even monkeys drive off or kill toxic members of the group.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    15. Re:increased response time by couchslug · · Score: 0

      I think we shouldn't be fussy about extra enemy casualties as they err on the side of good.

      Ideally, prison should turn a profit so we could keep violent predators and other extreme criminals (Bernard Madoff and similar) in prison for life and not be under pressure of crowding to let them out.

      I don't need them. Do you? If so, what for?

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  20. Ob. Robocop by Tastecicles · · Score: 2

    Out comes the shiv... ED 209 springs into action:

    "Please put down your weapon! You have twenty seconds to comply!"

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    1. Re:Ob. Robocop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just give it the ability to make disorienting amounts of sound and light for short periods of time and you can confuse the inmates enough to stop the fight.

    2. Re:Ob. Robocop by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      or surgically implanted behavioural modification devices, a la "Intestinator".

      I am such a geek.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    3. Re:Ob. Robocop by gajop · · Score: 1

      If anything, these robots will be used to make shivs. Well, at least it's not a bipod.

  21. Re:prisons will find a way to slow down or gum up by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    How about leaving gum on the floor to get caught in the robot's wheels/treads while they're doing their rounds?

  22. Now all we need... by marco.antonio.costa · · Score: 1

    ... are EMP grenades

    --
    Send your spendthrift head of state this
  23. Robot prison guards? by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1

    Oh, like THX1138?

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  24. Re:human guards are happy w/ the idea because they by hedwards · · Score: 1

    Because you don't staff guards like that. Keep in mind that this is a prison which means that you have to have sufficient guards to deal with whatever happens. Waiting for outside help is generally not reasonable except under extraordinary circumstances. You might be able to get by with fewer guards on rove, but you're not going to be able to cut any as you still have to have them there for when the robots break or when something starts.

    In the US where we have more concern for money than human life it might work out like that, but anybody with knowledge of staffing in the industry isn't going to fall for that.

  25. Re:human guards are happy w/ the idea because they by hedwards · · Score: 1

    lol, worst troll ever.

  26. Easier solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't it be easier to just have individual cells, so the only violence possible at night is self inflicted? Give them smaller, individual cells. Boom.

  27. Roomba by Boawk · · Score: 1

    with gun and camera options. Oh, and it's large--the dustbin hold is spacious enough to hold a corpse.

  28. yea I can bullshit my computer into many situation by Osgeld · · Score: 0

    if only it had wheels and oversees many gang members I would be one step closer

  29. Panopticon by Zandamesh · · Score: 1

    For those who are interested, there is a kind of prison architecture that allows the prisoners to think that they are being watched all the time:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panopticon

    --
    Lo and behold, for I am a sig!
  30. Re:human guards are happy w/ the idea because they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why we keep labor unions around long after they defeated all genuine abuse.

  31. Ahem ... by Grindalf · · Score: 0

    If the robots behave badly, do they make robot prisoners too? :0)

    --
    The purpose of existence is to make money.
  32. Re:human guards are happy w/ the idea because they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anybody with knowledge of staffing in the industry isn't going to fall for that.

    If it's a political decision the only thing that may prevent reducing staff is lost votes, if it is a business decision it is made by a person that may not be in that position when hell break loose and in the mean time have left for another job with a ton of money in is pocket for reducing costs.

    Real decisions are not done by someone with knowledge and in this times when there is money involved...

  33. I, for one, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    welcome our new robotic prison guards.

  34. These robots can't possibly work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The first law of robotics will prevent the robots from reporting the attacker, because the punishment will be getting tossed into solitary; solitary will bring harm (psychological at the least) upon him. Therefore, when a robot sees a conflict, the paradox of having to harm one human or not acting and having another human be harmed as a result of its inaction will make it explode. They should have consulted a qualified robopsychologist before undertaking this project.

    1. Re:These robots can't possibly work by Lockyy · · Score: 1

      A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. I assume it prioritizes immediate physical harm over putting someone in solitary. Otherwise it would violate the other half of the law via inaction. A black and white morality in the three laws just wouldn't suit any robot in any situation. Harm is far too broad a term to be useful anyway. Does my robot constantly jump to my aid before I stub my toe? Because god damnit I'd throw it out of a window after a few days.

  35. We are doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Their job is not cracking down on violent prisoners. They are helpers." Until they become self-aware and start plotting against the incompetent guards, the whole prison system, the governor, the president... mankind!!!!

  36. Ironic, if many prisoners are there from poverty by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    Rather than build robots to guard prisons, why not just get the robots to do the boring work outside instead of imprisoning people for not wanting to do the work (and stealing, selling drugs, etc. for money)?
    http://www.pdfernhout.net/recognizing-irony-is-a-key-to-transcending-militarism.html

    We need "A Newer Way Of Thinking":
    http://anwot.org/

    Where this may all be leading, Marshall Brain's "Manna":
    http://www.marshallbrain.com/manna1.htm

    Why not just have a "basic income" instead, funded by a tax on robotic factories?
    http://www.basicincome.org/bien/
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p14bAe6AzhA

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  37. Robot trial by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    So what did it DO and does it get a jury of it's peers or at least a 50/50 human/robot mix?

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  38. Johny Five is happy to provide your last meal. by PDX · · Score: 1

    Beware geeks bearing gifts.