Slashdot Mirror


Earthscraper Takes Sustainable Design Underground

Hugh Pickens writes"The 'Earthscraper,' a 65-story, 82,000-square-foot inverted pyramid beneath Mexico City takes a new approach to escalating megacity problems like population growth, urban sprawl, preserving open space, and conserving energy and water, promising to turn the modern high-rise, quite literally, on its head. The proposed building will be located at the Zocalo, Mexico City's major public plaza one of the few sizable open spaces left in the city of 9 million. 'It's a massive empty plot, which makes it the ideal site for our program,' says architect Esteban Suarez. The Earthscraper concept begins with a glass roof replacing the opaque stone surface of the Zocalo preserving the open space and civic uses of the Zocalo, while allowing natural lighting to flow downward into all floors of the tapering structure through clear or translucent core walls. The first 10 stories would hold a museum dedicated to the city's history and its artifacts. 'We'd almost certainly find plenty of interesting relics during the dig — dating right back to the Aztecs who built their own pyramids here,' says Suarez adding that the design incorporates a system of gardens occurring roughly every 10 stories, to help generate fresh air. One thing working in Earthscraper's favor is there are strict laws that prevent building upwards in this part of Mexico City, but no laws for building down. 'They will have to develop new laws to stop this from happening,' says Chief Design Officer Emilio Barja. 'I hope they don't [find the] time to do that.'"

23 of 269 comments (clear)

  1. Question: by markbark · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While inverted pyramids are an interesting design, what're you gonna do with the million cubic feet of dirt from the hole you have to dig to build the damn thing?

    1. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why, you use it to build an inverted-inverted pyramid outside the city somewhere.

    2. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You could for example dump it in the ocean to create more land.

    3. Re:Question: by Smallpond · · Score: 4, Insightful

      World's tallest building: 830 m
      World's deepest mine: 3900 m

    4. Re:Question: by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dig another hole to put the dirt in.

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    5. Re:Question: by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is cheaper to build the first few stories up than down. But at some point, the cost of holding up more and more floors, structural integrity issues, wind issues, etc come into play. May be even visibility to terrorists for insurance purposes. Building down, the only cost is earth removal and dumping it somewhere. But the earth starts getting hotter, and ventilation, fire escape etc get complicated.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    6. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Have you considered running for office?

    7. Re:Question: by nschubach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's the number of livable spaces for each of those?

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    8. Re:Question: by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The earth moves. Go down and you have to support the sides of the excavated pit. Water pressure also builds the deeper you go. Here is a conundrum for you. Build a series of say 4 story building, fill the gap between the buildings with compacted fill, are those buildings no above or below ground level.

      Want to save space the put your buildings over roads. Roads chew up a ton of space, local roads, major roads, inter-county roads and interstate roads.

      So build major thoroughfares and in public transport say rail, build up the next level to provide local roads and local public transport. The add retail with foot traffic, then commercial on top of that and finally residential. So no major arterial roads, also become major linear multi-use buildings and the space between becomes parks and gardens. So a major road linking two major cities could accommodate millions without using any additional land area and put all those people housed in immediate proximity to public transport.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    9. Re:Question: by Runaway1956 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That is EXACTLY what was on my mind. TFS refers to the history of Mexico City. Well - Tenochtitlan was started out by some drugged up dude who was lost in the swamps. Something about a vulture and a snake telling him that this was the land of the gods or some such nonsense. So - there are buildings in Mexico City that are sinking into that swamp, already. And, now, they want to dig DOWN, into that vast swampy lake, and build an underground city.

      Maybe I'll research the people who are in line for contracts. An investment in water pumps sounds like a good idea.*

      *This is where some clown suggests that the outer walls are going to be waterproof. I point to the Hoover Dam, in which channels were engineered for the water that flows THROUGH the concrete to be bled off. No one, nowhere, is going to build a structure this large, that is waterproof. Hell, seagoing ships aren't even waterproof! They all leak.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    10. Re:Question: by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

      When I first came here, this was all swamp. Everyone said I was daft to build a castle on a swamp, but I built in all the same, just to show them. It sank into the swamp. So I built a second one. That sank into the swamp. So I built a third. That burned down, fell over, then sank into the swamp. But the fourth one stayed up. And that's what you're going to get, Lad, the strongest castle in all of Mexico.

      There, I fixed it for you.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  2. sunlight how? by w_dragon · · Score: 4, Funny

    They're going to use translucent floors to get sunlight to the bottom? Great idea. Domain squatters, now would probably be the time to grab pyramidupskirt.com.

  3. No Windows by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One of the things I hate about my current job is that there are no windows anywhere near where I am seated.

    I frequently go weeks in winter without seeing sunlight because it is dark when I get to work and dark when I leave.

    I find windowless offices to be very dreary and depressing. Only the economy keeps me in this dreary place.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:No Windows by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Informative

      How much of that light will be available below the first few stories?

      If you go down to the bottom of a deep old-fashioned well- or a deep vertical cave the sky looks black even in daylight. - the diagnol light coming from the sun doesn't reach the bottom.

      The windows is more than just light too- I could have a window into my neighbours cube but it wouldn't do anything for me.

      There is nothing the same psychologically like seeing the outside world.

      Sure- real daylight with it's particular hues is a help- but a window onto a central core wouldn't be the same.

      You don't see the sun- the sky, the weather- birds, etc.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  4. Earthquakes by necro81 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Mexico City has been hit by some pretty nasty earthquakes over the years. I don't know if this design would be at all better or worse, but none of the linked-to articles make any mention of it. On the plus side, you don't need to worry about swaying or liquifaction - the structure is supported on all sides by bedrock. On the down side, the structure is supported on all sides by bedrock ... bedrock that is likely shifting inexorably around.

  5. Moria 2.0 by Tenek · · Score: 5, Funny

    Construction will have to be stopped after they dig too deep and release the Balrog, though.

  6. What about the buoyancy of this building? by VitaminB52 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ground water will cause a lot of buoyancy for this building - how will they prevent it from 'floating' upward? Other than using very thick walls from heavy construction materials?

  7. there is a reason this hasn't been done.... by Brigadier · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think this idea has been thought of in many arch programs, however from a practical side it's a dozy. The cost to excavate, the cost to transport the soil, dealing with ground water issue, 100 year flood conditions. even though it is a pyramid the retaining walls would have to be monstrous. Plus if anyone has ever seen what happens to an empty in-ground pool, there is reason for concern. I would put this out there with the floating island concept.

  8. Better coverage by Yev000 · · Score: 5, Informative

    This seems to provide more information: http://inhabitat.com/bnkr-arquitectura-reveals-plans-for-an-incredible-underground-skyscraper-in-mexico-city/bnrk-earthscraper11/?extend=1

    Over the past few decades, Mexico City has seen an enormous population boom. Though the steady influx of people is great, the city center is in desperate need of more office, retail, and living space. However, because of Mexico City’s historical significance, federal and local law prohibit the destruction of historical buildings (which is nearly everything) and have placed strict height regulations on new structures, keeping them shorter than eight stories. Thus, with nowhere to go, BNKR decided to invert a massive building design that digs deep into the heart of the city.

    The first 10 stories of the structure will be a Pre-Columbian museum. The glass ceiling will allow people walking through the plaza to enjoy the artifacts below as well. The next 10 stories will be for retail and housing. These floors were put below the museum so people would have to travel through it and explore the history of the city they would perhaps otherwise ignore. The following 35 floors will be office spaces.

    The whole design boasts a massive central void that allows natural light and ventilation to flow through every single floor. The “Earth Lobbies” on every 10th level also helps keep the building air fresh and clean, with enormous plant beds and vertical gardens filtering air toxins and producing more oxygen. These lobbies also serve as an open and clean communal area to break up and brighten the structure.

    The very bottom floors of the Earthscraper are for all of the technical parts of the building. A water turbine generator pushes water into the exterior wall pumps and recycles used and clean water for the building’s facilities while also powering most of the electricity.

    Named the Zocalo, the 190,000 square foot city center plaza is the ideal spot for an earthscraper. Surrounded by monuments like the Metropolitan Cathedral, National Palace, and Constitution Square, as well as a massive underground subway station, it is one of the most heavily trafficked sites of the city. BNKR’s design allows for the historical aesthetics of the plaza to remain while a bustling eco-center hums underground.

  9. UIUC undergrad library by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Reminds me a little of our library. I would be able to see it from my window if they had built it above ground, but they chose to go down instead.

    The legend of this decision lives on through a song about the Morrow Plots. As the song goes, "You Can't Throw Shade on The Corn!"

    The Morrow Plots were built in 1876 as an experimental field for growing crops, and is the oldest such field in existence in the western hemisphere. It might not sound like that big of a landmark, but the university decided to build our library underground to preserve it.

    --
    Free unix account: freeshell.org
  10. You're forgetting the water table. by overshoot · · Score: 4, Insightful
    No shit, Sherman. Mexico City is built in a silted-up lakebed. What's more, their sewage processing ... shall we say, leaves a bit to be desired.

    So -- how do they plan emergency evacuation of this thing if the pumps fail? Maybe during an earthquake? (Not like Mexico City has those, mind.)

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:You're forgetting the water table. by delinear · · Score: 4, Funny

      Life jackets by the door. You float up to the top and then, when you get there, the glass roof has a little hammer attached with a sign saying "In case of emergency, break glass" :)

  11. Gonna need it for the fire, Umbrella Corporation by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Running down 65 floors is a pain in the arse. Running UP 65 floors to the surface is a whole other story!

    There'll be people hoping a sewage line breaks before they have a heart attack running up stairs.

    Stories like these come along every few years about underground building. And everyone says, "Gee, that's a good idea. Why aren't we doing that already?"

    Then you tell them about fires, cave ins, flooding, etc. and that good idea doesn't look so hot anymore. Christ, has nobody watched Resident Evil? You don't need monsters, you just need to lose power, lights, and air ventilation and you'll be have a nice uphill riot on your hands. Those glass walls probably don't work to well on a cloudy day or night down near the bottom.

    Let's just go ahead and name this the Umbrella Corporation building.

    --
    I8-D