Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Facebook Denies Disputed Page To Both Mercks

Posted by timothy on from the virulent-pox-on-both-your-houses dept.

itwbennett writes "In follow-up to yesterday's story about how Merck in Germany is threatening legal action to take its vanity Facebook URL back from Merck U.S., Facebook apologized for its 'administrative error' in reassigning the URL but said that if the two companies can't play nice, no one will get the URL."

6 of 210 comments (clear)

  1. To which a Merck U.S. representative replied... by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Here, drink this soda and see if you still feel that way.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:To which a Merck U.S. representative replied... by Jeng · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was thinking the old formula for 7-up that included lithium.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  2. Difficult problem by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is a Mercky issue to wade through...

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  3. you go FB! by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Funny

    wise like king Solomon.

    No, I can't believe it either.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:you go FB! by DriedClexler · · Score: 5, Funny

      Solomon's solution would be give one of them the "Mer", and the other one "ck", and then instantly void the deal and give it to whoever doesn't want to see the name split.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
  4. Re:Trademarks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Look, if they didn't want their trademarks appropriated they shouldn't have gone to war with us 93 years ago.