Slashdot Mirror


E-Mail Can Reveal Your Friend Hierarchy

sciencehabit writes "It's not surprising that someone could guess your friends simply by peeking at your e-mail. But a more detailed look at your electronic communications could reveal which friends are closer to you than others, according to a new study. The trick has to do with response time--the time it takes for a sender to respond to e-mails from different contacts. The fastest responses went to friends and that the slowest responses went to acquaintances, with colleagues somewhere in between."

16 of 85 comments (clear)

  1. Fast Reply by alphatel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My fastest reply is always to the person who will make me the most money. My friends can wait.

    --
    When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
    1. Re:Fast Reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Technically you're friends with money

    2. Re:Fast Reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Being drunk often breaks this. When I'm drunk, I do everything randomly. Sometimes I email, sometimes I dont. Sometimes it goes to who it belongs to, sometimes it goes to random persons, sometimes it goes to my parents. Sometimes the message can contain valid stuff, sometimes the messages can contain solution to some hard problem, sometimes sexual suggestions and sometimes crying back my old girlfriends. Even if it ended up to my mother.

      Forget about thermal noise or quantum phenomena. Beer and vodka makes everything truly random!

    3. Re:Fast Reply by Anrego · · Score: 2

      I find replying to those people slow, because I go into full on uptight mode and agonize over every paragraph.

      My friends: "yeah we did that in the branch.. lemme know if it doesn't make sense!"

    4. Re:Fast Reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    5. Re:Fast Reply by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd tend to agree. Friends are usually important, work is usually urgent. Work gets a quick reply, friends get a longer more thoughtful reply. You'd need to take message length into account for this to work. I'll often put off replying to friends until I have enough time to write something longer, while colleagues get a quick 'yes, that looks fine' within a couple of minutes.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  2. Is this an article from 2005? by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't communicate with friends via email.

    1. Re:Is this an article from 2005? by rednip · · Score: 2

      Yea, but this article was about how good your friends are based on you're email response time. With the exception of work, email is mostly how I reset passwords.

      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    2. Re:Is this an article from 2005? by ebombme · · Score: 3, Funny

      Evidently I am extremely close friends with someone named HawtTexasRedheads.com...

    3. Re:Is this an article from 2005? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://HawtTexasRedheads.com

      That's not fair. I'm up for some redheads, and all you give me is a non-existing domain.

    4. Re:Is this an article from 2005? by LanMan04 · · Score: 2

      Sure you do, you just do it on Facebook. It's the same goddamn thing, but with even less privacy.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    5. Re:Is this an article from 2005? by antdude · · Score: 2

      Yeah, my friends and I are old farts (over 35) and love e-mails too. Funny, we don't like IMs and real-time chats. We use e-mails as IMs! :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  3. But... by pahles · · Score: 2

    why would you let somebody else peek at your email? It's not strange they found relationships if they examined *all* the email data of some firm. I hope they had permission to do so... Okay, the email you send as an employee is property of the employer, but still...

    --
    Sig?
  4. Uh-huh... by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 4, Funny

    My boss and other superiors must be my best friends in that case.

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
  5. Re:Who does this? by TWX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With texting and social networking sites, who actually emails their friends anymore? Everyone I know only uses email for work. Although I'd assume that the same would apply to those media as well.

    With the telephone and spending time with someone face-to-face, who actually uses the computer to communicate with their friends anymore? Everyone I know uses text-based electronic means to avoid talking to their "friends"...

    Seriously, I use electronic means to communicate with my real friends for a couple of things- to figure out where/when to see them, and to share things that are of mutual interest. If I don't see them in person or at least engage in an interactive discussion using my voice with them then I have a difficult time referring to them as friends. On a related note, I've been in a fandom-oriented social club for almost 20 years, and we meet in person every other week. We have a mailing list, but it's for, again, deciding things or bringing things to the group's attention that then get discussed at meetings. This club has met every other week since 1975 when it was founded, in large part because meeting face to face helps bind the group together better.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  6. Not about email by cshake · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Mixed-mode communication completely breaks this:
    When I get a really long email from a friend or family member asking a question that would take longer to write out than to explain over the phone, I'll wait until I'm free and then give them a call. I guess that means from an email perspective that I hate them and never reply.
    Or what about various organization mailing lists where you reply to the sender with a new email instead of sending something to the whole list?

    Of course this is all irrelevant because this study isn't really intended for emails, despite how they report it - it's for social networking sites with embedded messaging systems to be able to mine more data about you, so they can show you ads that your "closer" friends have clicked on in addition to matching with your profile items, so they can charge more for ads.