Slashdot Mirror


Should Composting Be Mandatory In US Cities?

Hugh Pickens writes "After San Francisco enacted the nation's strictest regulations on composting in 2009, the city has increased the amount of food scraps and plant cuttings it composts to more than 600 tons per day, more than any other city in North America, and recently celebrated the collection one million tons of organic materials. Other cities have been watching as Seattle passed a similar mandate in 2010 diverting about 90,000 tons of organic waste from landfills in the first year and New York City is trying to figure out how to implement this type of program for its 8 million residents. The impact is potentially huge in terms of reducing the load on landfills as a study by San Francisco's Department of Environment shows that more than one third of all waste entering landfills could be composted instead. 'We want to see composting be a standard for everybody,' says Michael Virga, executive director of the U.S. Composting Council. 'Urban, suburban, it doesn't really matter where you are.' Although composting initially costs more than land-filling, over the long-term, the benefits will outweigh the costs. 'We can reduce a large source of landfill-generated greenhouse gases, extend the life of our landfill, and generate a valuable resource for the community in the form of premium soil and mulch,' writes Shanon Boase. 'What's more, this industry generates additional jobs.'"

3 of 861 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Recycling by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 0, Troll

    So recycling is mandatory, but people in the US go without healthcare?

    No, this isn't about recycling. Which is mandatory in some places, but not in others.

    This is about composting...which is mandatory in some places, but not in others.

    That said, no, in general, people in the USA don't go without healthcare. The sometimes go without health insurance, but that doesn't mean that they don't get treated.

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  2. Re:Should X be mandatory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Huh? government, regulating, and good in the same sentence is not possible. Government is the worse and last someone I want controlling something like this. Government can and will always do a worse job than just about any one else.

  3. Re:Should X be mandatory? by s73v3r · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yes, it is a pain in the ass.

    Only if you're a lazy pile of shit.