Ask Slashdot: Ubuntu Lockdown Options?
First time accepted submitter clava writes "We have a desktop Java testing application that is going to be administering tests to students on lab computers running Ubuntu 10.x. These computers are used by the students for other purposes and we're not allowed to create special users or change the OS configuration. When the testing app is launched, we need to restrict users from exiting the app so they can't do things like search the internet for answers or use other applications. Is there a good way to put an Ubuntu machine in kiosk mode or something via our application and have exiting kiosk mode be password protected? Any ideas are appreciated."
I'm afraid if you want it actually locked-down, you're pretty screwed. You can't really disable things like switching to a tty with ctrl-alt-f1 without "changing the OS configuration."
Why not let them use resources? Similar to what they will have available to them in the workforce.
Create your own custom locked down kiosk boot image and require users to boot from that? Keep in mind that users might take the boot media home with them so they'll have a copy of the test app if you store it locally (as opposed to retrieving it from a website)
Here's an example:
http://jacob.steelsmith.org/content/ubuntu-kiosk-based-910
(I'm not vouching for this particular implementation, I just found it through a quick google search).
Not sure how hard this would be to do, but it seems like it would be fairly easy to boot from a livecd/usb key. If you remove packages you don't want the end user to have access to (it's hard to browse the web for test answers if there's no browser installed) that should address at least some of your concerns. An added bonus is that if you need to repurpose the machine, or if it doesn't need to be in test mode all the time, a simple reboot could restore it to a vanilla version of the OS.
Facts have a liberal bias.
Pull out the Ethernet connection. TADA!
did you even google your question?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=ubuntu+lockdown
maybe this will help you
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=456549
http://users.telenet.be/mydotcom/howto/linuxkiosk/ubuntu01.htm
http://library.gnome.org/admin/system-admin-guide/stable/menustructure-13.html.en
It's not a typo if you understood the meaning!
Just use the default Unity desktop bundled with recent Ubuntu releases. It's so fucking unusable in every respect that malicious and benign users alike will want nothing to do with it. They'll use only the Java testing application solely to avoid having to deal with Unity.
You'll never have to worry about them using Facebook, or adding additional users, or installing their own software. Even long-time Unity users have a whole fuck of a lot of trouble doing those things. Many just learn to accept that they never be able to.
I'd suggest having a whitelist of allowed process names that are allowed to be running during the test as that user. If any other programs are running when the program starts, it should not allow the test to be started until those programs are shut down (add a "kill all" button for newbie users). It should also have a watchdog that polls to make sure that the system is still clean. If it finds any unwanted programs, it should give the user 10 seconds to kill them or fail the test (or require a password to ignore this process). If you can do this in the same thread as the testing program, and in such a way that you can't just attach gdb and pause execution while you google the answers, you're onto a winner.
Hey, asshole. Ever occurred to you that, given clava's high UID, he/she isn't a geek and don't know enough of Linux/technology to do this? Look at how this question was redacted: it's obvious that he/she is not in control of the system, and is looking for some info here, where people with knowledge gather. Just answer the question if you can help and don't be pompous.
I rarely respond to comments. Also, don't ask for clarifications: a brain and Google are faster, believe me!
WTF Man. Maybe they are a math/english/whatever teacher using some sort automated grading system. Maybe they're a good teacher but bad with computers? But NO! Unless you crafted it yourself bit by bit then its tantamount to "cheating".
No Technology required:
1. Announce anyone caught cheating WILL fail the course.
2. Post exactly ONE proctor at the rear of the room. His job is to catch the FIRST cheat.
3. The first cheat should be escorted from the room, and given the following choice: become the proctor and catch another cheat, or fail. If you catch a cheat, you may retake the test and the cheat becomes the proctor with the same choice.
Lather, Rinse, Repeat.
I recommend you film for future entertainment value.
Red
1. Take bribes from other students to be the first one to cheat.
2. Blatantly cheat and get caught.
3. Become the proctor, and ignore everyone now cheating.
You're looking for a technological solution to a pedagogical problem. Redesign the questions and let them have all the Internet access they want.
This is exactly the solution I would have proposed, except it goes against the users requirements.
Disabling TTY access requires changes to the OS configuration which he is not allowed to make. Furthermore in Ubuntu, you can't just kill the current X session and start a new one from the command line with the application as the window manager, because it will helpfully restart X when it crashes (or is intentionally killed). You would either need to create a special user whose default WM is the application you want to run, or you would need to reconfigure the OS graphical login settings, neither of which he is allowed to do.
User applications are intentionally prevented from locking down a machine, otherwise any old piece of malware could do so. The only way to really lock it down to modify the OS configuration. That is why all the other answers are suggesting round-about ways to achieve the same goal. IMHO adamdoyle's is the best.
"Why do so many Slashdotters always feel like the best answer to a question is "you're doing it wrong"?"
This happens everywhere on the internets where you ask a question. Ask a Microsoft support website how to do something that "should" be possible, but isn't. (Can't think of an example now) You'll get 10 answers telling you how to "work around" what you asked, and another 20 answers questioning why you or any one else would want to do this thing. What you will never ever get is even 1 person saying "Our product cannot do this thing".
Someone asked a very similar question on Stack Overflow. It's here. The short version is: if you're running KDE and can change the window manager configuration, no problem. If you can change which window manager, then sure. (Also, the previous "yank the ethernet cable" or "boot off of live CD/USB" suggestions are quite reasonable. However, it is possible to handle most of it in the application using JNI to write X-Windows code which will capture most all keystrokes. It doesn't get ctrl-alt-backspace, but it appears to get prevent most of the rest.
I do not carry such information in my mind since it is readily available in books. ...The value of a college education is not the learning of many facts but the training of the mind to think.
-- Albert Einstein
Was he a slacker too?
Time spent memorizing stuff is time that could be better used understanding it. Having no access to reference material is a ridiculous limitation.
How did this quote come to you? From memory?
You want the taste of dried leaves boiled in water?
I worked on this project for a Primary school. It's worked well for >2 years for 120 pupils.
http://linuxcentre.net/wiki/
The parts about automatically resetting the homedir after reboot is probably of interest to you.
http://linuxcentre.net/wiki/index.php/Detailed_Maverick_Meerkat_OS_Netbook_Customisation below Home_Directory_Synchronisation