Slashdot Mirror
Massive Radio Telescope Starts Observing the Skies
New submitter cyachallenge writes with this excerpt from New Scientist: "RadioAstron, effectively the largest radio telescope ever built, is up and running. The telescope's main component, a 10-metre radio dish aboard the spacecraft Spectr-R, launched in July to an oblong orbit that extends between 10,000 and more than 300,000 kilometres from Earth. By coordinating observations with radio telescopes on Earth in a technique called interferometry, the telescope can make observations as sharp as a single dish spanning the entire distance between the two farthest dishes. When Spectr-R is at its farthest from Earth, the system acts like one enormous telescope about 30 times as wide as our planet, boasting about 10,000 times the resolution of the Hubble Space Telescope."
it's too big to fail.
Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
I always thought Oblong was more rectangular than elliptical. Of course the rectangle with rounded corners was invented by apple.
.. it still "only" has 10m of aperture (+ the aperture from radio telescopes on Earth) so it will have a hard time detecting faint objects near its maximum resolution. It will be excellent at detecting small details of bright objects though.
Unlike the Chinese, that seem to do a lot of "me, too" stuff (which is very impressive, of course), the Russians do work that is nicely complementing the US, European (ESA) and Japanese efforts. The Spektr-R (and RadioAstron) is something novel and unique, and will provide insights in the astrophysics and astronomy beyond the Milky Way with high angular resolution.
Another example is ill-fated Phobos Grunt. It would have been another interesting and unique experiment.
"The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
http://www.asc.rssi.ru/radioastron/index.html
That's one hell of a shift.
Astronomy isn't exactly about pretty pictures, you know! But even then, you can make pretty pictures out of data from other bands of the EM spectrum, like the AC mentioned earlier.
Actually, in radio astronomy you can't really say it's photons. The wavelengths are centimeters to meters (a pretty large photon), and you get wave-effects everywhere.
It's not true that this or other radio telescopes are no match for Hubble. This satellite links up with ground-based telescopes and does VLBI. The baseline of VLBI -- equivalent to the aperture diameter for optical telescope -- is the distance between the linked telescopes. If you want to have a telescope as powerful as Hubble, you need to compare diameter/wavelength (Hubble example: 2.4m/440nm = 5e6). So for radio (e.g. 21 cm), you need a baseline of 1050 km. Ground-based VLBI networks, like the Australian LBA (3300km Perth-Sydney, 5500km Perth-Auckland) or the European EVN, the VLBA (8000km) reach these lengths. This brings you down to milliarcsecond resolutions, incidentally similar to the optical VLT interferometer.
RadioAstron will be on an "orbit that extends between 10,000 and more than 300,000 kilometres from Earth".
So yes, it will be a match for Hubble by a factor of 100. However, this comparison is not really helpful, as optical and radio telescopes see different things and probe different physical processes. To understand the universe, information from all wavelengths is relevant.
NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
Forget "oblong", how about "massive"? Massive has to do with, well, mass. Seems that Aricebo might have the best claim for that (using the Earth itself as part of the structure).
The world is made by those who show up for the job.