Slashdot Mirror


Fracking Disclosure Rules Approved In CO

ExE122 writes "Colorado has approved new measures taking a tough stance on the disclosure of chemicals used in fracking. The new law is 'requiring companies to disclose the concentrations of chemicals in addition to the chemicals themselves.' Fracking is a controversial method of natural gas extraction that raises concerns about health and safety issues to surrounding communities. This measure is said to be tougher than similar measures passed in Texas earlier this year."

4 of 279 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Secret Sauce by LoyalOpposition · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm pretty sure they aren't fracking with 1000 Island dressing.

    Strangely enough, a major component of fraccing fluids is guar, which is also a major component of most salad dressings.

    ~Loyal
     

    --
    I aim to misbehave.
  2. Re:Great! by N7DR · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Apparently the greatest concentration of fracking sites in the US (possibly the world) is in south-western Weld County in Colorado. Which is where I live. From my house I can see perhaps a dozen of these drilling sites. It's always seemed bizarre to me that it's even legal to push chemicals into the ground under and around my house -- but apparently it is, because around here very few people own the mineral rights associated with the ground on which their house stands.

    But then, it's also illegal for me to capture rainwater, which seems at least equally strange.

  3. Re:Finally got a handle on the friggin' fracking by CowTipperGore · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Soon enough? Fracturing has been done in the United States since 1947.

    And if you think today's fracking is anything like what was done in 1947, you have no business in this conversation. Industry misinformation like this is not relevant to the discussion.

  4. Re:Great! by Derkec · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Downstream is a key component. We get rain / melt-off that is used by farmers and cities in other states as well. Water in the west is a precious thing and "ownership" of it is order dependent. Someone owns the first drop of water flowing in the river, and someone else own X gallons / time period only if there's enough left over them after the senior stakeholders are accounted for. Those rights don't care if you are upstream or downstream, but on seniority.

    With the possibility of water intensive shale oil extraction, oil companies have been buying senior water rights in Colorado for some time and then leasing them back to farmers / etc. If shale oil happens seriously, and needs the water that's predicted, things could get ugly in a hurry.