Slashdot Mirror


Chrome 15 Overtakes IE 8 For Top Browser Spot

An anonymous reader writes "If you're reading this on Chrome, you're part of a wave that has ditched Internet Explorer or Firefox and helped vault Google's browser to the top Web browser spot worldwide." Are you reading this on Chrome? (I'm using Chromium right now, but that's pretty close.)

14 of 507 comments (clear)

  1. First post from firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    IE lagging behind again.

    1. Re:First post from firefox by rhyder128k · · Score: 5, Interesting

      An excellent point. It's also worth noting that Firefox is the most popular browser in Europe. Probably due to those EU regulations about Windows offering a default choice. Y'know the ones that people said would have no effect anyway.

      http://uk.reuters.com/article/2011/01/04/us-internet-europe-idUKTRE70324F20110104

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
    2. Re:First post from firefox by InsightIn140Bytes · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Same goes for Opera, which is extremely popular in Russia and CIS countries and actually beats any other browser. It has like 50% market share in some countries. http://my.opera.com/dstorey/blog/2009/03/16/a-look-at-desktop-market-share-cis-edition

    3. Re:First post from firefox by Requiem18th · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I also want to add that all the popularity of Firefox is due to it's own quality.

      Chrome is aggressively advertised in all Google services, specially Youtube.
      It also has TV ads including Super Bowl ads, using celebrities like Justin Bieber, Lady Gaga and even Hatsune Miku!

      It also tries to sneak installs by sponsoring freeware downloads with chrome bundled. Opt-out of course.

      They even messed up with the opt out option to make it hard to opt-out. I am specially offended by that *because* it is such a petty thing to muck with. It was a simple, straight forward Windows form but the opt-out option was semi-disabled. Oh come on that's just childish!

      So I'm not impressed by Chrome's market share. It mostly shows the efficacy of strong marketing. I'm not saying it is a bad browser, or that Firefox is perfect, just that Chrome's success isn't really due to some sense of superiority.

      And another thing.

      What is with Chrome fanboys? Google is a for-profit corporation vent on market domination. It is NOT a good thing if Chrome kills Firefox, the last thing we need is another browser monoculture.

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    4. Re:First post from firefox by BrokenHalo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I also want to add that all the popularity of Firefox is due to it's own quality.

      True. Firefox is now a rock-solid, stable and mature browser. Having said that, I have actually been using Chromium as my default browser for a few months, for just two reasons:
      1. Chromium loads webpages perceptibly faster, and
      2. because Chromium by default takes up marginally less real-estate on my laptop screen with menubars, toolbars and whatnot that are not necessary.

      However, if Chromium were not available, I would not be persuaded to use Chrome, as I am not happy about the possibility of anything I do being relayed to Google.

    5. Re:First post from firefox by machine321 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's that song from Lion King... you know, Hatsune Mikuta.

    6. Re:First post from firefox by Nimey · · Score: 5, Informative

      Back in the day Opera /was/ worth the $39 license fee. This was in the days of Netscape 4 (ptui!) and Internet Explorer 4 (bletch), and it was really the only decent browser; didn't crash your system on a regular basis or bring it to a crawl.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    7. Re:First post from firefox by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So you have the source code for Chrome and have built it from source?

      You have any of the really important Google software, i.e. the backend source code?

  2. All versions of IE combined still beat everyone by Meshach · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Also are they lumping all versions of Chrome together? All versions of Firefox together?

    Seems misleading...

    --
    "Maybe this world is another planet's hell"
    Aldous Huxley
  3. I'm completely baffled by Stormwatch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I simply can't understand how a browser with such a godawful interface could get so popular.

  4. Tree style tabs by DragonHawk · · Score: 5, Informative

    The one thing that keeps me off Chrome for serious web browsing is the lack of a **full** equivalent to Tree Style Tab. I've found various attempts, but until something with all the critical features is available, I can't leave Firefox.

    And yes, it's that important. I find serious web browsing without tree tabs is basically unusable.

    Some analysis of Chrome extensions I've tried follows below, along with a longer explaination of why tree tabs matter.

    -----
    Why tree tabs are important

    Critical features:

    * Arrange tabs in a hierarchy (subordinate/superior relationships)
    * Links middle-clicked to open in a new tab, open under the current tab
    * You can collapse branches of the tabs tree, like a folder tree in Explorer/Outlook
    * You can drag tabs around to restructure the tree

      For example, my current top-level hierarchies at work are "PVI clusterfsck", "vern buerg list", "to read", "vmware ctrl alt del", "new server", and "training". "training" has four immediate subtabs, each for various training providers we use at $WORK. Each of those is an exploration of their course hierarchy. I can expand or collapse any section or subsection as my focus changes. I can also bookmark branches for later.

      For me, at least, knowledge isn't linear, it's tree structured. The Back/Forward paradigm is totally inadequate for the task.

    -----

    Tree Style Tabs (Beta)
    https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ffididlaalcoegfcalmeldjfnihmoech

      Unfortunately, it's lacking some features. The biggest is that it
    doesn't actually replace the tab bar across the top of the screen.
    Rather, it gives you a new toolbar button, which, when clicked, drops
    down a tree structure. No way to make that appear permanently, that I
    can see. (TreeStyleTab appears much like a "side bar" in Firefox.)
    The tree structure does reflect which tab opened from which. But I
    can't drag tabs or branches to organize them, nor can I
    collapse/expand branches.

    -----

    Tab Sense
    https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/oiabeebnmckkdjloeofbfladabfhedlg

      Similar to the "Tree Style Tabs (Beta)" above. Same
    button-not-a-sidebar issue. Does allow collapse/expand, which is
    good. It opens up a new Google Chrome window to hold collapsed tabs
    (with the message to minimize it and forget about it), which is rather
    kludgey. Still can't drag tabs.

    -----

    Tabs Manager
    https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ioigddmjfpphkbamgbaolfkpifddnaje

      Same button-not-a-sidebar issue. Tab structure doesn't appear to
    reflect browsing history. Seems to have only two levels, a "folder"
    it creates, and all your tabs. Does allow dragging of those tabs, but
    I'm not sure what the point is. Can't find a way to create a folder.
    I'm not quite sure what the point is.

    -----

      Some of these limitations might be due to Chrome's architecture,
    rather than the extension programmers. In particular, I suspect
    Chrome just doesn't let extensions have enough access to the UI to do
    anything really useful. Which is a shame, because Chrome feels so
    much faster than Firefox.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  5. For those of us with SSDs however... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've used Chrome a lot and like it even more. Unfortunately, a mere day's browsing generates 700,000 writes according to windows (almost an order of magnitude over any other browser). As an SSD user, this just isn't acceptable and all the fixes are a complicated way of 'shoving the cache onto a spinning disc drive'.

  6. Re:Firefox still rules by bhcompy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    without a proper NoScript solution, all other browsers fail. FF is a bloated beastly browser, but can't live without NoScript anymore.

  7. Mozilla needs to get their shit together. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The ones who should be worried about this are not Microsoft. Rather, they are Mozilla. This news just goes to show how irrelevant Firefox is quickly becoming. Luckily for them, they still have time. All they need to do is stop doing the stupid shit that they've been doing the past couple of years.

    First, bring back the fucking menu bar and the status bar by default! The space gained by not showing them is much less valuable than the time saved by having the browser's functionality easily accessible (using the menus) and by having informational messages shown much more obviously (using the status bar). It was a really fucking stupid decision to hide these by default, and it has crippled Firefox's UI. No, I don't want to dig through about:config trying to find the right options to re-enable this functionality that shouldn't be disabled by default.

    Second, go back to a sensible release schedule! Put out solid, well-tested major releases once a year. Use version numbers that are actually meaningful. Don't succumb to stupid release policies or version number shenanigans just because Chrome does. Using a sensible release schedule will also help prevent the UI from changing drastically on a monthly basis, which only serves to drive users away.

    Third, fix the really fucking horrible memory and CPU consumption that Firefox has exhibited for years now. This alone is one of the major reasons why people use Chrome. It's not that they like Chrome, but rather they just don't like how Firefox consumes so much fucking memory even after short browsing sessions, and even when using a fresh installation with no extensions or add-ons installed yet. It's even less pleasant when Firefox feels so much slower than Chrome, Opera, and even IE these days.

    Fourth, show the damn protocol in the URL bar by default! Yes, it's important, and no, it doesn't waste space. It was a pathetic decision to remove it, and it really made Firefox much less usable. No, I don't want to dig through about:config trying to find the right option to re-enable this functionality that shouldn't be disabled by default.

    Mozilla had their most successful years before Firefox 4. It has been all downhill since then. It's also been long enough that it should be obvious that this new approach isn't working. It's driving away the core Firefox users who made Firefox what it once was. If Firefox is just going to be a poor imitation of Chrome, and inferior in many ways, then why the fuck don't people just use Chrome? Well, that's what's happening. Maybe Mozilla can get their shit together and fix this problem before Firefox is completely irrelevant.