Slashdot Mirror
Victory For Irish File Sharers Dashed By Government Report
2phar writes "The Irish Government is 'to publish an order early in the new year to allow music publishers, film producers and other parties to go to court to prevent ISPs from allowing their customers access to "pirate" websites.' The government has 'written to music publisher EMI Ireland confirming the order will be published and incorporated into existing legislation in January ... EMI Ireland recently warned the Government that it would take legal action against the State if the Government did not address the problem.'"
This is a response to a ruling that Eircom's current "three strikes" rules were illegal due to privacy issues.
Ireland. You're now our bitch. Bend over and take it like the sissy you are.
-RiAA
"File Sharers" has a bad connotative definition, justly or not, because of the marketing against 'file sharing' being bad. ...but back on point....
Email, IMs, text messages, VOIP, regular phone calls, are all forms of "file sharing", depending on how you look at it.
The previous court finding was a victory common sense, good judgement, and for those in power having a basic understanding of how technology works.
Looks like TOR and other proxy/tunneling services and procedures are about to get a lot more popular in the Republic of Ireland...
> EMI Ireland recently warned the Government
Ok, so now corporations not only sue people, they openly threaten governments of legal action, and governments chicken out and pass laws that restrict people's freedom. Can we yet declare a new feudal regime?
So you're not going to be hauled over the coals through a three strikes system - WIN!
Certain sites may be blocked - Meh.
If you really want to get to a site you'll get to it either via tor, running your own DNS, or via a VPN. I'd take this system over a three strikes any day.
The months are just too short. I can count the number of days on one hand.
I guess Ireland has no concept of sovereign immunity, or is this a result of how the EU is structured?
I think the music-industry is hostile to free speech. It is not ethical to buy their music. Use creative-commons or small, independent labels instead.
EMI Ireland recently warned the Government that it would take legal action against the State if the Government did not address the problem.
"We'll sue you if you don't change your laws"?! On what basis? Did I just misunderstand that sentence?
I'm glad I don't live where you live where fundamental freedoms can just be revoked on the whim of a law-maker. If someone tries to legislate my freedom away, they'd better be ready for a fight.
Just imagine if the progress of science was bound by "intellectual property" - we'd still be in the dark ages. Human culture has always revolved around the sharing of culture, whether that means singing songs around a campfire or viral youtube videos, sharing is in our nature.
You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
So.... where do you live? If you answer United States i'm going to piss myself laughing so hard.
File sharing technologies have been evolved to provide the maximum amount of convenience to as many users as possible. An inconvenient system results in too few users for a file share network to be sustainable. The goal of organisations is to reduce the number of users. The goal of sharers is to increase it.
The "Three Strikes Law" enabled organisations to state that they will catch people file-sharing and cut off their connection. We have to persuade users (most being non-technical) that the technology we produce to evade detection (encryption etc) keeps them safe. This is difficult when they are also being told it does not work by our opponent organisations.
This regulation against ISPs creates a technical problem without recrimination for solving it. It essentially results in an inability to trust the security and reliability of the network technologies at the lower end of the OSI model (controlled by the ISPs). This results in more inconvenience for the end user but no fear.
This plays straight to our hands. Not only are the developers of communication systems used to dealing with unreliable networks, we can now go to people with our tools (Tor,Free DNS etc), but instead of having to persuade them that it protects them from punishment, we just have to show them the tools remove their inconvenience - resulting in more users using encrypted file sharing technologies and tor.
As a bonus, we can help users hide and encrypt everything by default, creating a culture of protected information amongst ordinary people. This not only satisfies the goal by the file sharers, but also reduces the effectiveness of every other regime and organisation from governments down who want to censor the information people share.
If we play this right we will be telling our children we were there when we took away control of the internet.
So you don't live in the USA - Where laws allowing companies to do this were created?
Or Europe - where they apply
Or any other 1st world nation - who have signed up ...
Or Any 3rd world nation who owe enough to bow to the corporations
which leaves repressive dictatorships...
So you don't live on Earth ? - Life does exist on other planets ...!
Puteulanus fenestra mortis
If you have enough money to go round suing governments, piracy must not be cutting very deep into the bottom line.
Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
The UK - so you'll probably still have a good laugh.
You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe