Slashdot Mirror


Raspberry Pi Beta Boards Unveiled

First time accepted submitter anwe79 writes "Those of you who have been wishing for a Raspberry Pi this Christmas will sadly not get your wish granted. However, you may be happy to hear that populated beta boards have now been produced. Beta of course means the boards still have some more testing to undergo. But, if all goes well, those inclined should be able to get their hands on production boards in January!"

161 comments

  1. Vaporware until it is in my hands by bingbangboom · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I've been let down before.

    1. Re:Vaporware until it is in my hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'll wait till it boots myself. I've been really let down before.

    2. Re:Vaporware until it is in my hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll wait till I can build a super beowulf HD remix cluster edition of Pis so I can finally take over the world. With Math!

    3. Re:Vaporware until it is in my hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:Vaporware until it is in my hands by Zerth · · Score: 1

      I'll wait until it runs 3 months without the power supply melting. I've been burned before.

      *cough* Globalscale sucks.

    5. Re:Vaporware until it is in my hands by Threni · · Score: 2

      Go away. If you've been following the website you'll see they're around 3 weeks behind schedule but have finished the whole design process and are now testing the hardware before mass production. Do you even know what vaporware is?

  2. I cant wait to taste that pi by Osgeld · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of course I am still under the "it doesn't exist until I can blow it up my self doing something dumb" crowd but it's making good progress

    1. Re:I cant wait to taste that pi by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course I am still under the "it doesn't exist until I can blow it up my self doing something dumb" crowd but it's making good progress

      It *is* making "good progress". But where these types of projects usually hang up is when they finally get to the stage where they need to put together the infrastructure to source parts, manufacture, and market the *product*. At this point, they generally realize that they just don't have the organization and resources necessary, and the sub-$100 price point is out-the-window unrealistic for the volume they can realistically project to move...

         

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:I cant wait to taste that pi by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      that does not sound nearly as fun as hooking mains up to a loudspeaker

    3. Re:I cant wait to taste that pi by JonySuede · · Score: 0

      you are my hero !
      Someday in my 50's I will switch from prescribed amphetamine to alcohol.
      When that inevitably happens, I wish to be as aggressively manly as you are.

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
    4. Re:I cant wait to taste that pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Perhaps you missed it, but Broadcom is selling them the silicon by tacking it on to larger production runs, so they've got as much as they want at quantity pricing.

      They've already bought the other parts so sourcing isn't a problem(for the first 10k anyway).

      http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/302

      And clearly they've got the marketing down, otherwise you wouldn't be discussing it:)

    5. Re:I cant wait to taste that pi by EETech1 · · Score: 1

      Funny, that's how they demo'd my Cerwin Vegas at the store. Had them wired to a power strip, just waiting for you to flip the switch! BWWWWWWWWW

      Cheers

    6. Re:I cant wait to taste that pi by DrXym · · Score: 3, Informative

      It *is* making "good progress". But where these types of projects usually hang up is when they finally get to the stage where they need to put together the infrastructure to source parts, manufacture, and market the *product*. At this point, they generally realize that they just don't have the organization and resources necessary, and the sub-$100 price point is out-the-window unrealistic for the volume they can realistically project to move...

      I think Raspberry Pi's price goal is pretty ambitious but at the same time it's not outrageous. It's basically running the same parts you'd find in any cheap ass media player. You can pick up media players for less than $100 and if you cut out the case, packaging, power supply, application software, optional software licences (e.g. AC3, Dolby), reseller margins, and just ship the barebones product you could do it for the price they're proposing. Or if not exactly then not far off it.

    7. Re:I cant wait to taste that pi by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Sourcing the parts and getting it made really isn't a problem. I've done it for electronics with even more limited demand than this for a similar sized, similar part count board. There are assembly shops that can do runs of assembled boards right from just one example to hundreds of thousands, they do all the parts sourcing for you, you just give them a BOM and they organize it all. Most the parts on the Raspberry Pi will be common parts (resistors, capacitors, standard connectors, various ICs that get put into many different products) and are very easily sourced.

      I've managed it *as an individual* with no organization backing me using these services.

      I would agree on the marketing-the-product bit. The electronics really isn't a problem these days unless you're making something really odd with very unusual parts. Nothing about the Raspberry Pi is hard to source, especially since one of the team actually work at Broadcom and therefore can probably easily source the only thing that might cause problems, the SOC.

    8. Re:I cant wait to taste that pi by Rogerborg · · Score: 0

      Sourcing the parts and getting it made really isn't a problem. [...] I've managed it *as an individual* with no organization backing me using these services.

      If you did it for under $100 then you must value yourself cheaply. $100 doesn't even buy an hour of my time.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    9. Re:I cant wait to taste that pi by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you missed it, but Broadcom is selling them the silicon by tacking it on to larger production runs, so they've got as much as they want at quantity pricing.

      I had missed that. I don't know much about the semiconductor industry so perhaps someone could confirm - does that mean that while they get them at quantity prices, that pricing is subject to Broadcom receiving sufficient orders for the same part so there are larger production runs to tack it onto?

    10. Re:I cant wait to taste that pi by boley1 · · Score: 2

      Some of the key volunteers have an "In" with Broadcom. Broadcom is being very supportive, with inside information on which parts make the most production and cost sense.

    11. Re:I cant wait to taste that pi by froggymana · · Score: 1

      Sourcing the parts and getting it made really isn't a problem. [...] I've managed it *as an individual* with no organization backing me using these services.

      If you did it for under $100 then you must value yourself cheaply. $100 doesn't even buy an hour of my time.

      Most people aren't consultants!

      --
      "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
  3. Design flaw? by Keruo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think that surface-mount usb power connector will fail eventually since the images seem to show it not welded through-board.
    Maybe they'll fix it on later models.(or it is already, but I'm not seeing the throughwelds from the pictures)

    --
    There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
    1. Re:Design flaw? by fnj · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The surface mount USB on my Beaglebone fell right off. The glue holding it failed with hardly any stress. There are big lands to solder it to, but they didn't use these. They only used glue. What the heck is the attraction of these stupid mini and micro USB connectors anyway? Give me a soldered-through full-A connector any day.

    2. Re:Design flaw? by Gourou · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From the earlier post of the bare boards (http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/402) the holes are there for the micro-usb, and the project has been geared towards clumsy hands plugging and unplugging the ports a lot so I'd expect a robust connection.

    3. Re:Design flaw? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 4, Informative

      What the heck is the attraction of these stupid mini and micro USB connectors anyway?

      The Raspberry heads stated that they wanted to be compatible with cheap phone chargers...

    4. Re:Design flaw? by sahonen · · Score: 0

      You can't automate soldered-through component assembly. SMD can be automated, and is therefore vastly cheaper to do. That's the attraction.

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    5. Re:Design flaw? by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes you can. I've seen a machine that does it.

    6. Re:Design flaw? by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      All your worries can be solved with the right enclosure. The USB connector will be as sturdy as you make it. For example, encase this entire board in resin... nothings coming off it. That's the simplest solution, and it might cause overheating, but if you sit down and think about it, there are a lot of other ways of making that connector more secure.

    7. Re:Design flaw? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Look up wave soldering.. Fuckwit.

    8. Re:Design flaw? by Kagetsuki · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Who scored this -1? AC is absolutely correct. Whoever scored it -1 is a fuckwit.

    9. Re:Design flaw? by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Are you by any chance an N900 owner?

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    10. Re:Design flaw? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I am, and boy, I know exactly what you're talking about...

    11. Re:Design flaw? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like the -1 Flamebait was spot on.

    12. Re:Design flaw? by trjonescp · · Score: 1

      You can, but it adds another step (more $$) to the manufacturing process if all you don't have homogeneous component type (e.g. all SMD or all through hole).

      I've never had a problem with mini USB SMD connectors that come with two through-hole mechanical support posts (not soldered to anything - just snugly fit through holes you provide) plus four tabs that are soldered to big pads to provide the strong board attachment. Inside most consumer products this is how the mini and micro USB connectors are attached and it doesn't seem to be an issue.

      --
      Only speak when it improves the silence.
  4. I wanted one for Christmas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been checking the website every day for like 6 months.

  5. no mounting holes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are no holes in the board for mounting it to a case which seems like a major oversight. Maybe the RPi is good for education, their mission, but for my own projects I'll probably go for a BeagleBone. It costs about three times as much (the RPi is absurdly cheap), but at least it has documentation and mounting holes to go with its 50% faster processor.

    1. Re:no mounting holes by sirnobicus · · Score: 3, Informative

      From the FAQs there will be cases and mounting options just not on initial release. http://www.raspberrypi.org/faqs

    2. Re:no mounting holes by mirix · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd like something with openness like the beagle (so an ARM from... TI, Atmel, NXP, etc - no NDA bullshit, single quantity readily available) and the price of this thing.

      I don't really care if they cut the speed down to 3-400MHz and drop video to do it, but maybe I'm an edge case...

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    3. Re:no mounting holes by fnj · · Score: 0

      I agree. Broadcom sucks donkey balls. The most tightass company in the world.

    4. Re:no mounting holes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never heard of Apple then?

      Broadcom are no longer the monsters they are made out to be - they are definitely getting better.

  6. Arduino, anyone? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think you've brought up a very good point: Are there *already* "mature" products that do these things? The Arduino product line comes to mind. There is MUCH to like about Raspberry Pi, but little chance we'll ever see these things marketed for a reasonable *hobby* price. Prototyping something and saying the parts cost xyz does not really address realistic cost of the infrastructure necessary to actually source, manufacture, and yes, *market* something like this, which in all reality is very niche.

    And, Arduino already exists in this market. This is not a troll: What does Raspberry Pi expect to do that something in the Arduino line does not? What are Raspberry Pi's close "competitors" in terms of expected use similarity? And, is there room for more than one or two competing products in this niche?

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is a full blown Linux box, unlike Arduino. I'm planning on hooking up a small USB-SP/DIF board. With a USB wifi adapter and web interface controlled by my phone, I'll have a cheap, pocket sized, remote controlled "bit bucket" for my concert recording hobby. I doubt you can do that with Arduino, or at least not without major hacking.

    2. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Rapeberry PI does not appear to be positioned as an Arduino competitor, but rather as an accessible (monetarily) computer. Please explain how the Arduino is even remotely positioned as an accessible computing platform.

      http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2011/09/arduino-arm-products/

      96 MHz, 256KB RAM... fast, but have fun trying to run any software a typical consumer would be willing and able to use...

      Now if it had 640KB RAM, well now.. that ought to be...nvm

    3. Re:Arduino, anyone? by godrik · · Score: 2

      Isn't the raspberry pi significantly more powerful and cheaper?

    4. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Are there *already* "mature" products that do these things? The Arduino product line comes to mind.

      Beagleboard and pandaboard and various 32-bit demo/development boards provided by the device manufacturers come to mind. Beagle/panda would run circles around arduinos.

    5. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a full blown Linux box, unlike Arduino...

      I keep hearing this. But no, NO, it is not a "full blown Linux box". Or anything close.

    6. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2

      Raspberry Pi microcontrollers are already at work in the utility...

      Are they really? Already? Source, please.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    7. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Isn't the raspberry pi significantly more powerful and cheaper?

      Is it? As yet, it *is not* in production, so on both of those points, it's impossible to say. It would be nice, though. And of course AFTER you add in the cost of an io device like a keyboard and of course a storage device, what's the total price now? Without some way to interact and store code, it's no more than a chip on a board.

      Seriously, tooting about a $25 *nix computer is a bit disingenuous unless one also mentions that without spending about $200 or so more, there isn't much you can do with it. And then we're in the cheap laptop territory, yes?

      I'm not saying it isn't interesting from the home-brew computer standpoint, but by itself, it's not a very useful "full blown computer".

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    8. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, everyone is at a different level in their development when it comes to learning. Everyone has to start somewhere and those that start with Arduinos are not "retards" as you so graciously put it.

      I don't think these Raspberry things are all that good. There is unlikely to be datasheets or documents on the processor for you or me, just for those that can purchase 100K units. I'd rather start with a small ARM7/9 board or MIPS board where the SoC manufacturer releases documentation. Seriously, Broadcom hides all the interesting functionality in a binary CFE (Common Firmware Environment - a BIOS like thing) and they will not tell you how the device really works. That's pretty much my gripe with the Raspberry. It has great features and great price, too bad it isn't documented better (at all).

    9. Re:Arduino, anyone? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      And, is there room for more than one or two competing products in this niche?

      If, by niche, you mean sub $100 ready to go project boards with USB and HDMI? I don't know of any others just lying around at the moment. Beagle / Panda are getting close, but they are a) bigger, and b) more expensive.

      In the sub $100 project board space, there always seems to be room for a bunch of players, kind of like "free games."

    10. Re:Arduino, anyone? by CnlPepper · · Score: 4, Informative

      Bullcrap, why don't you go and watch the video of it being demo on their website. It's running an ARM version of ubuntu.

    11. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Arduinos are for retards. They're for all the people who seek validation being able to get LEDs to blink without knowing any annoying facts like operating voltages. The Raspberry Pi, however, is a BASIC stamp. That means that the real money-makers, the ones who know microcode, get back to work.

      OK, WTF, time out. Can someone please explain this strange new trend of trolling with the intent of making yourself look stupid? I think it started on either 4chan or Fark, but it's been showing up here a lot lately. When I learned to troll, I was taught that the idea was to make the other guy look stupid.

      Kids these days. Personally, I blame the excessive use of psychoactive prescription drugs in our schools.

    12. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt this board can handle UnIty.

      Kidding. But everything official says Debian, Fedora, Arch. I'm fine with those. Please don't make me go back to ubuntu just because they're more eager to build for ARM.

    13. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The poster surely meant that the same microcontrollers that the raspberry pi uses (broadcom), not the raspberry proper.

    14. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has no io peripherals and no storage. It is NOT a "full blown" Linux box regardless of what they have cobbled together to force it to run in some very limited way.

    15. Re:Arduino, anyone? by tibman · · Score: 1

      eh, sd card slot, hdmi out, and usb.. it appears to cover the peripherals and storage. There's also RCA video out and audio too.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    16. Re:Arduino, anyone? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      I guess you guys have different definitions of "full blown" and "only bare skeleton" with each other.

      for the record I don't count my android as a full blown linux box.. even though it has onboard memory and it's sd card slot is populated and it has a display attached along with an input device.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    17. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't have a pile of input devices and a wall of old lcd/crt/tv's, well, you may just be on the wrong website.

      In other words: You don't need to go dump "$200 or more" to get this thing running. You grab your old stuff that's missing a feature or three, and you use that.

    18. Re:Arduino, anyone? by spongman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      $200? hardly.

      $10 for a keyboard/mouse if you can't get hold of an old set.
      $3 for a micr-USB charger, if you can't find a powered USB socket.

      what else? a TV, an internet connection, a table, a chair, service from the power company, adequate nutrition. this stuff adds up!

    19. Re:Arduino, anyone? by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      yeah, i'm confused. i just saw that arduino retails at 15USD at the local hobby shop. it has a 16MHz atmega328 and 32KB flash memory. these raspberry guys are promising a board that is the same size and has 700MHz arm11, 128MB ram, and sd card slot at 25USD??!!?1
      seems bullshit to me. if it were possible to do it so cheap, somebody would have been selling these by now.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    20. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, I'm lucky enough to have a Raspberry Pi alpha board. And it basically can do the same stuff (albeit a bit slower, except the 1080p30 encode!) than my Linux desktop.

      Runs LXDE, Midori via a USB wireless adapter, USB keyboard and mouse etc. Have run various X apps. Plays back 1080p30 video, runs Quake at 1080p at around 30fps.

      Using Debian. Ubuntu isn't supported - they don't have Armv6 anymore.

      I personally think it will be very good at its intended purpose.

    21. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roku 2 uses the same SoC. BRCM2835

    22. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were doing well until you made yourself look like a Scientologist.

    23. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot an universe :-) Universes are expensive...

    24. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's because it's the Arduino that is overpriced -- they're basically selling you a board with a $1 microcontroller and surrounding peripheral circuits for $15.

    25. Re:Arduino, anyone? by bcmm · · Score: 1

      The Arduino is an advanced microcontroller. The RaspberryPi is a minimilist Linux computer. Not an embedded thingy like iPodLinux either; it's capable of running a real, conventional distro with glibc, Xorg, etc.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    26. Re:Arduino, anyone? by bcmm · · Score: 1

      It has onboard storage via the SD card slot; and USB for external storage (the only external storage anybody really uses now anyway). You just need a mouse, a keyboard, and a monitor, which plenty of PCs don't come with.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    27. Re:Arduino, anyone? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      To me the key features of a "full blown linux box" are

      1: enough storage to install a regular linux distro
      2: a MMU so you can run proper linux kernel rather than uclinux/uclibc
      3: enough ram to reasonablly run the aforementioned regular linux distro.

      The pi has all of those

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    28. Re:Arduino, anyone? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      umm, I wouldn't call them "more eager", debian have supported arm since before ubuntu existed and are currently in the process of bringing up a new hardfloat arm port to complement their existing softfloat port.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    29. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Dan+Dankleton · · Score: 1

      Best. Comment. Ever.

    30. Re:Arduino, anyone? by fnj · · Score: 1

      Bingo. But it's not so much that the Arduino overpriced; there's just no real pressure to make it cheaper than $15. Heck, that's close enough to free already.

      GP should realize that you can always say "somebody would have done it already". The Wright Flyer, the Model T, the light bulb (heck, it's just a hot wire in a vacuum). Well, "somebody" *IS* doing it first.

    31. Re:Arduino, anyone? by fnj · · Score: 1

      The $89 BeagleBone is for screwing with hardware. There are pins bringing out logic IO. Everything is open and documented. They don't have any video because that's not what it's for. The Raspberry Pi is for screwing with software. They don't bother bringing out logic IO pins because that's not what it's for. There are proprietary binary blobs for the cheapass Broadcom shit. To some extent the products overlap, but the targets are different.

    32. Re:Arduino, anyone? by fnj · · Score: 0

      It costs extra to replace the Broadcom crap with something documented. Check out the Beaglebone. It's $89, but everything is documented. The Beaglebone is intended for screwing with hardware. It includes IO pins.

    33. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SDHC card or at least USB stick for mass storage too.

    34. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except it brings out eight 3.3v unbuffered GPIOs, TX/RX and a full SPI bus(which you could use as more GPIO).

      Somebody has already built an expansion board to provide buffering, plus a bunch of SPI expansion chips.

    35. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know fuck all about that 'cheapass Broadcom shit', so STFU unless you have something to backup that assessment,. Which you don't.

    36. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What that thing is $55. I just bought a USB sound card with spdif in and out and 5.1 analog and stereo mic in for $15 including shipping on ebay. It's based on the CM106 and even the analog sounds 10x better than my motherboards audio.

    37. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      Amazingly, the Raspi is shipped inside a Universe which you can use!

    38. Re:Arduino, anyone? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see if the thing will work with some of the USB NIC devices, because it looks like it could make a great little router.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    39. Re:Arduino, anyone? by boley1 · · Score: 1

      Right, and no video.

    40. Re:Arduino, anyone? by I+AOk · · Score: 1

      As Ubuntu is based on Debian, I don't think they would have an ARM distribution if Debian didn't have theirs first...

      --
      [iconv --from-code=utf-7]
    41. Re:Arduino, anyone? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      A great little router that you hook up to a spare HDMI in on your 50" flat-screen for one helluva network status display.

    42. Re:Arduino, anyone? by ongelovigehond · · Score: 1

      Or, you can use the computer you already have for $0.

    43. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ALL OF THE ABOVE except via http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/freecycleisleofman/ :(

  7. Unsuitable for teaching by cachimaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This board is perfect if you want to learn to program ARM assembly or cross-compiling but the ARM architecture it's one of the most closed and patent-restricted technologies out there. Teaching ARM is the equivalent to teaching Visual Basic Programming, common but very closed architecture.

    So it's not really open, even if the PCB design is open.

    A truly open system would be OpenRISC, there are dev. boards out there like this one (I'm not affiliated to OpenRISC in any way). They are more expensive because are made with are FPGAs, but that's what you should learn in school.

    Wait until work to learn proprietary stuff.

    1. Re:Unsuitable for teaching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You could use these boards to teach Linux (operations, programming, etc.), cross-compiling techniques, embedded programming and lots more. Sure OpenRISC might be pure openess but it does not hurt to learn and teach practical stuff that could be put to use making a living.

    2. Re:Unsuitable for teaching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What other $25 Linux boxes are out there for teaching Unix, web programming, and other high level stuff? I don't think teaching ARM assembly was high on their list.

    3. Re:Unsuitable for teaching by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What other $25 Linux boxes are out there for teaching Unix, web programming,...

      Show me WHERE I can buy one of these for $25?

      Remember the OLPC project? Weren't those supposed to be sub-$100? How much did they end up being?

      These are *not* in production (or anywhere near production) yet.

      When (if) these make it to production, expect the price to be more than $25.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    4. Re:Unsuitable for teaching by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      most closed and patent-restricted technologies out there. Teaching ARM is the equivalent to teaching Visual Basic Programming, common but very closed architecture.

      So it's not really open....

      Take a look at Qt on Pi...

    5. Re:Unsuitable for teaching by CnlPepper · · Score: 1

      God forbid you might like to use the board to teach C, C++, perl, python, pascal, BASIC,..... this thing is designed for kids in a classroom and for use at home on the TV.It is designed to be dirt cheap so breaking one isn't going to be a problem.

    6. Re:Unsuitable for teaching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you take a look, they have been pretty open about how they plan to achieve that price - it looks reasonable. Not saying it's 100%, but it's entirely possible.

    7. Re:Unsuitable for teaching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It *will* be available, early in the New Year, from the Raspberry Pi website. So yes, they are very close to production. Not sure why you think otherwise.

      It *will* be sold at the advertised price. A lot of time and effort (and money) has been expended making sure of that. So please, DON'T expect the price to be more than $25 for the Model A and $35 fro the Model B.

    8. Re:Unsuitable for teaching by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Teaching ARM is the equivalent to teaching Visual Basic Programming, common but very closed architecture.

      Uh, what?

      No; teaching people to program C on an ARM Linux machine is the equivalent of teaching people to program C on an x86 Linux machine: the CPU is proprietary, but who cares?

      The cross-compiling thing is a red-herring too; you'd just run GCC on the RaspberryPi and for educational purposes it would be plenty fast enough.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    9. Re:Unsuitable for teaching by josath · · Score: 1

      RMS, is that you? The world is never going to be your communist open source utopia where closed source and profiting off of software is illegal. People don't need the netlist for every IC they use. This board is more closed than most, but it's a compromise I'm willing to make as the price per performance is better by a mile than anything out there.

      --
      sig? uhh, umm, ok
    10. Re:Unsuitable for teaching by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      Stop with the $25. That is just marketing, I doubt they actually expect to move the first one of those because they are pointless. You need a keyboard and mouse and the Model A only has one USB port. Good luck finding a hub cheap enough that it doesn't make more sense to just spend the extra $10 for the Model B and get a network port as a bonus. As if network is optional these days.... unless you are going WiFi but price that out... along with a hub. Not to mention that running much of anything modern in 128MB ram is going to be a challenge; and that is before the main processsor (the totally closed GPU) scarfs up a huge ass chunk of that minimal memory load.

      So lets break it down. $35 for the Model B plus a power supply for $5. Now you still need a case and I doubt those will be cheap, call it $15. Add in a USB keyboard and mouse for another $10. Yea it is still fairly cheap but now we need to ask WHAT the HELL it can actually do that a surplus P-III can't? Or if you want the I/O ports and are doing robotic/embedded stuff instead of a wierd desktop on a TV what could you do with the existing AVR stuff for really cheep. Or better, buy an Android phone or tablet, root it and thar ya go. You get a screen and perhaps some sensors for under a hundred if ya shop careful, see eBay.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    11. Re:Unsuitable for teaching by cachimaster · · Score: 1

      You can also use OpenRISC for that, and if the kid want to design his own CPU he can do that too, unlike with this board.

    12. Re:Unsuitable for teaching by cachimaster · · Score: 1

      It is not about pure openess, it's about knowing what the f*** is happening inside a CPU. I bet none of you know.

    13. Re:Unsuitable for teaching by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Maybe these folks can use it in their soon-to-be-release game console.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  8. Reality is coming by jmorris42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Dunno, I was in the same camp, no way they would actually ship at the stated prices, expect a doubling which would make it too expensive to be interesting. Or at least less interesting than the many other similar project computers and/or microcontroller products actually shipping. But if they are expecting to begin shipping next month and still holding to the original price they are either really going to pull it off or are truly idiots with zero business sense. I'd give em even odds at this point. :)

    But why is it front page news every time these guys pass gas? If they ship it, that is news. Heck, when they auction off these guys I'd guess that would be news too. But d we need a story every month even when there isn't any actual news to report?

    --
    Democrat delenda est
    1. Re:Reality is coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe they decided that they are, in fact, doubling the price for the first production runs to get them going.

      So it looks like your intuition was correct. The promise is that later runs will be back down to the $25 and $35 prices they were aiming for, depending on the model (with or without networking, essentially).

    2. Re:Reality is coming by ajo_arctus · · Score: 2

      I don't think that's true. I try and follow the project as best I can, and I've not seen that claim made once. The first 100 (this batch) are going to be auctioned on ebay, but that was always the plan. They've got another 9,900 boards that are unpopulated, and if testing of the 100 goes well they'll be populated and sold for $25/$35 in Jan.

    3. Re:Reality is coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      From what I gather - that was more because they had so much demand, they figured it was sensible to use market forces rather than have way more orders than they can handle. Jolly sensible, if you ask me - they get some capital from the initial sales, early buyers can still get it, people who would have bought it early, but don't care *that* much can wait a bit, get it at the advertised price. Better than having them all sold out for the first 4 months, making who gets it a random luck thing, and not gaining from it.

    4. Re:Reality is coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not true. The first 10k batch will be sold at the advertised price. $25 for the Model A and $35 for the Model B.

      100 boards have been made for testing, 10 of those will be auctioned off if they work OK. Once all testing is done, the 10k batch will be ordered. That will be sometime in early January if all goes well.

      The people behind the project have LOTS of experience in running big companies, so that's not an issue. And as for saying this is non-news. Hmm, I would have thought the first boards of what may be a game changing device coming off the production line would be news in most peoples book.

    5. Re:Reality is coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Only ten of the first 100 will be auctioned off.

    6. Re:Reality is coming by bcmm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But why is it front page news every time these guys pass gas?

      Mostly because they're being very open about the development process on their blog, meaning you see stories about stages which wouldn't be announced publicly in comparable projects.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    7. Re:Reality is coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/302

      That's the last official word on their blog about their double-price plan. Note the update at the bottom. I haven't seen anything to the contrary on the site, though I don't monitor the forums closely.

  9. Re:Arduino, anyone? NO HDMI ! by redelm · · Score: 2

    The Raz' closest competitor are the plugs (Sheeva, Guru, Pogo-, ...) and they are OK for ssh. Arduino is fine as a microcontroller, but is no GP computer.

    What is unique and very interesting about the Raz is HDMI output. It can easily be a small xterm, or any other app you can compile for ARMv5t and stick on the SD card. Or email / web-browser on the network model. Not fast, but useable.

  10. Bending USB the spec? by dbc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They appear to be bending the USB spec quite seriously. A USB device is allowed to draw up to 100mA before enumeration, and up to 500mA after being enumerated and negotiating for high power. They talk about using up to 700mA with networking connected -- it's not clear to me how it could enumerate without booting first -- so they seem to be giving the middle finger to the USB specs. I predict unhappiness when people find that only some USB power sources are going to tolerate the load.

    Is it so hard to put a couple of holes in the board to solder wire to?

    1. Re:Bending USB the spec? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      so they seem to be giving the middle finger to the USB specs.

      Like the iPad?

    2. Re:Bending USB the spec? by harrkev · · Score: 1

      Well, I would imagine that this is so that you can use any old USB power supply that you have on hand. You know, the same ones used by all decent modern phones, the Nook, some cameras, etc. If you shop around, you can score a 120V to USB power supply for well under $5, and most everybody has a micro-USB cable lying around.

      Some monitors even have USB hubs built-in. Easy enough to hook a cable from the monitor to the Raspberry PI for power, and another cable from the Raspberry Pi to the monitor for USB connectivity. Add a mouse and keyboard, and instant computer with a minimum of parts.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    3. Re:Bending USB the spec? by Nursie · · Score: 1

      That spec is all but irrelevant these days, as many, many mini- and micro-USB chargers exist that give far more than this with no negotiation at all.

      Perhaps the spec needs changing to reflect the real world usage?

    4. Re:Bending USB the spec? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      USB 3.0 allows 900 mA, the battery charging spec 1.5 A.

    5. Re:Bending USB the spec? by Kagetsuki · · Score: 2

      As someone who's built USB devices I can tell you it's a gamble anyway. I've seen busses give 500mA without negotiation and I've seen busses that won't put out 500mA after, and I've seen busses where the manufacturer realized people wanted to charge things so they put out something like 1500mA.

      As for devices that plug in to USB but require more than 500mA to run check out the BeagleBoard - it requires more than 500mA to use most peripherals (network) but if you run on anything more than 500mA the thing starts overheating. As for the architecture let's just leave how I think about it as "I actively avoid purchasing devices that use OMAP".

    6. Re:Bending USB the spec? by redelm · · Score: 2

      Half my 6 USB chargers claim 1+A output, the other half 500 mA (older). Who knows what they really do?

      I strongly expect Raz went for USB power to avoid all the national electrical approvals necessary for wallwarts. Remember, this is a shoe-string outfit. Just get a phone charger with someone else' approvals. They probably chose micro- over mini- because the former are more likely to make 700+ (iPod & smartphone draws).

    7. Re:Bending USB the spec? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No a usb power supply at 700ma is actually a standard:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_External_Power_Supply

    8. Re:Bending USB the spec? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The charging specification does not require enumeration.

      http://www.usb.org/developers/devclass_docs
      Battery Charging Specification, Revision 1.2
      Section 1.4.7

      Try to keep up.

    9. Re:Bending USB the spec? by bcmm · · Score: 1

      The choice of microUSB rather than USB-B or something is probably because there is a spec for high power over microUSB. It's used in the new standard mobile phone chargers. IIRC, a dumb charger can short the D+ and D- pins; indicating that it is too stupid to operate a real bus or do enumeration, but a device is welcome to draw as much current as it wants (with voltage possibly dropping if it draws to much; like a battery).

      Perhaps somebody more knowledgable could correct some details or link us to the spec.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  11. prediction.. by fliptout · · Score: 1

    If this cheapo pc made for TVs gains any traction, we'll start seeing them built in to the TVs. Surest way to commoditize this stuff.

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
    1. Re:prediction.. by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Most modern tvs probably have more power than this already.

      My Samsung plasma (a couple of years old now) already has a UPNP/DLNA network media player, youtube interface, app-installer type thing and a variety of other stuff built in. Meaning it's already got a general purpose embedded computer in there, it's just feature limited at the moment.

    2. Re:prediction.. by Lemming+Mark · · Score: 1

      That's true. I think there'll still be a place for these as separate boards though; for the educational and hobbyist markets (which I think is what they're targeting and expecting to be popular with) it's quite important to be able to easily replace broken devices and to be able to incorporate them into other designs.

  12. Mounting holes? by Animats · · Score: 1

    Is it so hard to put a couple of holes in the board to solder wire to?

    Is it so hard to provide screw holes holes for mounting?

    Also, it's usually considered a good idea to put all the connectors on the same edge and line them up flush so you can put the thing in a box.

    1. Re:Mounting holes? by Dan+Dankleton · · Score: 1

      IIUC, the connectors are where they are to keep the size to a minimum while having as few PCB layers as possible.

    2. Re:Mounting holes? by boley1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is. Impossible? No. This has been discussed at length on the PI forums. There is a delicate balance between size of the board, size of the components, and available real estate. Mounting holes add little value, but use up valuable real estate. There are a number of ways to mount boards without using holes.

      Also explained in detail at the Pi site: When size, space and cost are not important, you can put connectors anywhere you want, but when these are paramount you put the connections in good enough locations. You just have to be a little cleverer with your box design.

  13. So wait... by zammer990 · · Score: 0

    Do I get a raspberry pie or 3.14159 rasperrys?

    1. Re:So wait... by tzot · · Score: 1

      It seems more like the average selling price for Raz models sold will be $100/pi.

      --
      I speak England very best
  14. Re:I yawned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The point remains. Why would anyone buy one of these? Let me dish out a few points:

    1. If it's running a linux kernel that means that you're going to basically be writing software in C/C++/Whatever for it. Why not just do that on your large linux box at home?

    2. Looking at this thing it doesn't seem to have a large number of I/O and its processor is overkill for most embedded processing. When I said other cheap options I was thinking about PIC and other embedded micros but Arduino is another example to.

    3. What market is this suppose to address? The cheap subtablet market? I don't get it. Most hobby projects will be better, cheaper and easier on a simpler micro and if you want to write large software, just use your home linux box. In either case there is already stuff on the markets for these very niche markets.

    4. I have a hard time thinking this is a learning tool since if you really want to get into embedded hardware, picking your own micro and laying out the board is not a hard thing to do and you'll learn a lot more in the process. There are only so many projects that need a small overpowered processor and none of them are hobby/learning projects.

  15. Re:Arduino, anyone? NO HDMI ! by Nursie · · Score: 2

    The Raz' closest competitor are the plugs (Sheeva, Guru, Pogo-, ...) and they are OK for ssh

    The sheevaplug I have is powerful enough to run Gnome 2 in a vnc session. It also has built in storage and an SD reader.

    "What is unique and very interesting about the Raz is HDMI output"

    That's not unique, the Guruplug Display has HDMI also, though I have no idea if that ever really took off and I have a feeling debian had decided not to support it. It is more poweful than the Pi, and has twice the RAM.

    The unique thing about Rasberry Pi is the proposed price though, with the Guruplug display at $200. Though that does come with a case and power lead, 4 USB slots and two micro-SD readers.

  16. Re:I yawned by Nursie · · Score: 2

    1. My large linux box can't be put into as many places as this, makes a lot more noises and consumes a hell of a lot more power.

    2. You missed the part of the board that exposes all the other GPIO pins on the processor then?

    3. Cheaper than 25 bucks? And I can program them using the languages and runtimes I'm used to? With all the operating system features I have come to know and love? With HDMI output? Sign me up...

    4. And as full systems such as this become cheaper, who will need to bother doing that any more? The embedded space is becoming more and more dominated by systems running linux already, this will only accelerate.

    This is a learning tool for computer science in general, not just embedded programming. You lack imagination.

  17. Best scheme for power supply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you need more USB ports than provided on-board, you'll need a powered USB hub. Use one of the downstream ports from the hub to power the RasPi, and plug the mother-cable (I'm sure there's a better term, but I'm tired) into one of the RasPi's USB ports. Voila.

  18. Re:Wake me up, please. by Alioth · · Score: 1

    They already have a manufacturer lined up, from what I've read.

  19. Re:Wake me up, please. by isama · · Score: 1

    In the forums there was even talk about 5 manifacturers.

  20. Re:Wake me up, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong on so many counts....

    It's a Linux machine, not a microprocessor project board.
    There are no other devices like this on the market at the price point.
    Cost of boards are set - $25 for model A, $35 for model B. All sourcing and manufacturing is in place. Components for first 10k batch already purchased.

  21. the real question is by fredan · · Score: 4, Funny

    does it blend?

  22. Yeah don't forget the roof over your head... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only reason to have that is to use a computer under right?

  23. Re:I yawned by Dan+Dankleton · · Score: 3

    I want a bunch of them, I've got several ideas already. Personally I want one to make into a software defined radio transceiver (hopefully there will be an API to the DSP to do the heavy lifting on this,) I want one to use as a browser in the kitchen for looking at recipes while cooking, and I want one to have on my desk at work as a syslog display machine. To do the first without using a Pi, I'd need to do an awful lot of embedded development myself whereas here a lot of the work has been done already. The recipe browser would be ideal with a cheap tablet (cheap because I'm expecting to spill things on it,) but I've already got spare monitors knocking around so a Pi will be even cheaper. And the Pi is a lot smaller and quieter than a general purpose desktop. The syslog display I currently do on my laptop on a separate monitor, but it would just be easier if it were on a separate machine. £15 is a price that can easily be justified. The market it's supposed to address is education, mainly for programming. It's designed so that kids can mess about with it, install what they want on it and not break the family's computer. It's designed so that kids can have one each instead of having to share one of the school's lab machines. It's designed so that the kids can do work at school and take that work home with them. It's designed to be very difficult to brick, but if it does get broken then the cost of replacing it is not too much.

  24. Re:I yawned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1: I'm going to put one in a broken, mid-90s laptop that's lying around in the attic. You can't do that with a big linux box.

    3: People who want a small, cheap, portable PC. Possibly people who carry live USB sticks around so they can run Linux on whatever computers are around - now all I need to find is a screen!

    4: Who said anything about embedded hardware?

  25. Re:I yawned by Dan+Dankleton · · Score: 1

    Oops, sorry for the formatting.

  26. Mod down by n1ywb · · Score: 1

    Could you please at least Google it before you write a post on a topic you obviously know NOTHING about and cause the entire world to be misinformed?

    --
    -73, de n1ywb
    www.n1ywb.com
  27. NDA Problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a huge problem with this board. Sure, the ARM11 chip is well known, but everything about the VideoCore IV GPU is behind an NDA. Developing under those conditions is hard and goes against the grain of what the PI is trying to accomplish. They should have gone with other silicon.

    1. Re:NDA Problem. by boley1 · · Score: 1

      The Pi is not intended for teaching GPU programming. The Pi's number one goal was to be cheap, very cheap so any school kid can own one. Adding even $.50 in cost was not an option. In the cost performance world of silicon, closed is the way to go.

    2. Re:NDA Problem. by makomk · · Score: 1

      I doubt it was intended to teach "dealing with buggy proprietary graphics drivers that only support certain kernel versions" either...

  28. Why Pi is front page news. by boley1 · · Score: 1

    I think you nailed it, they are being open in the most useful sense IMHO.

    Not that many of us have the contacts and technical and business and financial and intestinal talents required to pull something like this off. People seem to be falling into several divergent camps. It's a major breakthrough in price/performance, that is impossible in the real world, or no big deal, I know of somebody else, almost able to do the same thing (only costing twice as much).

    They also have laudable goals for the project.

    Watching them disprove the naysayers post by post is quite entertaining.

  29. Re:Wake me up, please. by BritneySP2 · · Score: 1
    > It's a Linux machine

    You mean, it won't run NetBSD?

  30. the real question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for sharing such an interesting and informative post. yazili sorulari

  31. Re:Arduino, anyone? NO HDMI ! by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    What is unique and very interesting about the Raz is HDMI output

    The beagle/panda series has a HDMI connector (though the signal on it is apparently only DVI, not sure if the same is true of the pi).

    What is really unique about the Pi is the price. Afaict the sheevaplug is $99+shipping and the begleboard is arround $140 (the beagleboard is sold through distributors)

    As a beagleboard owner afaict the biggest issue is storage, SD cards SUCK at handling the random access workloads that come from tasks like updating packages.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  32. Re:I yawned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You, sir, are one of the few sane ones here.

  33. Re:Wake me up, please. by WorBlux · · Score: 1

    It probably could, but you wouldn't get graphics acceleration for it. (proprietary driver). It may be able to do windows 8 (but only in metro mode)

  34. Insert Obligatory Beowulf Cluster Remark Here... by MrLinuxHead · · Score: 2

    Seriously, I would install a dozen of these type B boards in a case, only use a single power supply, a Ethernet switch and make a low power blade server. I think the power / speed / price ratio would work out. Add a NAS for storage, and you could have a fairly powerful blade for a fraction of the big boys. BOM works out to 12 x 35 = 420. Add a case / PS, Switch. Boot from SD and store everything on a NAS (add extra cost for storage). There's a lot to like about these boards. I think they could be a game changer.

    --
    I may be bad with names, but I'll never forget your IP address
  35. Re:Insert Obligatory Beowulf Cluster Remark Here.. by cmdr_tofu · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking about adding monitors to my pc with raspberry pi and symergy2.source forge.net. I hope I can do network over the USB power