Slashdot Mirror


Raspberry Pi Beta Boards Unveiled

First time accepted submitter anwe79 writes "Those of you who have been wishing for a Raspberry Pi this Christmas will sadly not get your wish granted. However, you may be happy to hear that populated beta boards have now been produced. Beta of course means the boards still have some more testing to undergo. But, if all goes well, those inclined should be able to get their hands on production boards in January!"

40 of 161 comments (clear)

  1. I cant wait to taste that pi by Osgeld · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of course I am still under the "it doesn't exist until I can blow it up my self doing something dumb" crowd but it's making good progress

    1. Re:I cant wait to taste that pi by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course I am still under the "it doesn't exist until I can blow it up my self doing something dumb" crowd but it's making good progress

      It *is* making "good progress". But where these types of projects usually hang up is when they finally get to the stage where they need to put together the infrastructure to source parts, manufacture, and market the *product*. At this point, they generally realize that they just don't have the organization and resources necessary, and the sub-$100 price point is out-the-window unrealistic for the volume they can realistically project to move...

         

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:I cant wait to taste that pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Perhaps you missed it, but Broadcom is selling them the silicon by tacking it on to larger production runs, so they've got as much as they want at quantity pricing.

      They've already bought the other parts so sourcing isn't a problem(for the first 10k anyway).

      http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/302

      And clearly they've got the marketing down, otherwise you wouldn't be discussing it:)

    3. Re:I cant wait to taste that pi by DrXym · · Score: 3, Informative

      It *is* making "good progress". But where these types of projects usually hang up is when they finally get to the stage where they need to put together the infrastructure to source parts, manufacture, and market the *product*. At this point, they generally realize that they just don't have the organization and resources necessary, and the sub-$100 price point is out-the-window unrealistic for the volume they can realistically project to move...

      I think Raspberry Pi's price goal is pretty ambitious but at the same time it's not outrageous. It's basically running the same parts you'd find in any cheap ass media player. You can pick up media players for less than $100 and if you cut out the case, packaging, power supply, application software, optional software licences (e.g. AC3, Dolby), reseller margins, and just ship the barebones product you could do it for the price they're proposing. Or if not exactly then not far off it.

    4. Re:I cant wait to taste that pi by boley1 · · Score: 2

      Some of the key volunteers have an "In" with Broadcom. Broadcom is being very supportive, with inside information on which parts make the most production and cost sense.

  2. Design flaw? by Keruo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think that surface-mount usb power connector will fail eventually since the images seem to show it not welded through-board.
    Maybe they'll fix it on later models.(or it is already, but I'm not seeing the throughwelds from the pictures)

    --
    There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
    1. Re:Design flaw? by fnj · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The surface mount USB on my Beaglebone fell right off. The glue holding it failed with hardly any stress. There are big lands to solder it to, but they didn't use these. They only used glue. What the heck is the attraction of these stupid mini and micro USB connectors anyway? Give me a soldered-through full-A connector any day.

    2. Re:Design flaw? by Gourou · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From the earlier post of the bare boards (http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/402) the holes are there for the micro-usb, and the project has been geared towards clumsy hands plugging and unplugging the ports a lot so I'd expect a robust connection.

    3. Re:Design flaw? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 4, Informative

      What the heck is the attraction of these stupid mini and micro USB connectors anyway?

      The Raspberry heads stated that they wanted to be compatible with cheap phone chargers...

    4. Re:Design flaw? by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes you can. I've seen a machine that does it.

  3. Arduino, anyone? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think you've brought up a very good point: Are there *already* "mature" products that do these things? The Arduino product line comes to mind. There is MUCH to like about Raspberry Pi, but little chance we'll ever see these things marketed for a reasonable *hobby* price. Prototyping something and saying the parts cost xyz does not really address realistic cost of the infrastructure necessary to actually source, manufacture, and yes, *market* something like this, which in all reality is very niche.

    And, Arduino already exists in this market. This is not a troll: What does Raspberry Pi expect to do that something in the Arduino line does not? What are Raspberry Pi's close "competitors" in terms of expected use similarity? And, is there room for more than one or two competing products in this niche?

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is a full blown Linux box, unlike Arduino. I'm planning on hooking up a small USB-SP/DIF board. With a USB wifi adapter and web interface controlled by my phone, I'll have a cheap, pocket sized, remote controlled "bit bucket" for my concert recording hobby. I doubt you can do that with Arduino, or at least not without major hacking.

    2. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Rapeberry PI does not appear to be positioned as an Arduino competitor, but rather as an accessible (monetarily) computer. Please explain how the Arduino is even remotely positioned as an accessible computing platform.

      http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2011/09/arduino-arm-products/

      96 MHz, 256KB RAM... fast, but have fun trying to run any software a typical consumer would be willing and able to use...

      Now if it had 640KB RAM, well now.. that ought to be...nvm

    3. Re:Arduino, anyone? by godrik · · Score: 2

      Isn't the raspberry pi significantly more powerful and cheaper?

    4. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2

      Raspberry Pi microcontrollers are already at work in the utility...

      Are they really? Already? Source, please.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    5. Re:Arduino, anyone? by CnlPepper · · Score: 4, Informative

      Bullcrap, why don't you go and watch the video of it being demo on their website. It's running an ARM version of ubuntu.

    6. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Arduinos are for retards. They're for all the people who seek validation being able to get LEDs to blink without knowing any annoying facts like operating voltages. The Raspberry Pi, however, is a BASIC stamp. That means that the real money-makers, the ones who know microcode, get back to work.

      OK, WTF, time out. Can someone please explain this strange new trend of trolling with the intent of making yourself look stupid? I think it started on either 4chan or Fark, but it's been showing up here a lot lately. When I learned to troll, I was taught that the idea was to make the other guy look stupid.

      Kids these days. Personally, I blame the excessive use of psychoactive prescription drugs in our schools.

    7. Re:Arduino, anyone? by spongman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      $200? hardly.

      $10 for a keyboard/mouse if you can't get hold of an old set.
      $3 for a micr-USB charger, if you can't find a powered USB socket.

      what else? a TV, an internet connection, a table, a chair, service from the power company, adequate nutrition. this stuff adds up!

    8. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, I'm lucky enough to have a Raspberry Pi alpha board. And it basically can do the same stuff (albeit a bit slower, except the 1080p30 encode!) than my Linux desktop.

      Runs LXDE, Midori via a USB wireless adapter, USB keyboard and mouse etc. Have run various X apps. Plays back 1080p30 video, runs Quake at 1080p at around 30fps.

      Using Debian. Ubuntu isn't supported - they don't have Armv6 anymore.

      I personally think it will be very good at its intended purpose.

    9. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's because it's the Arduino that is overpriced -- they're basically selling you a board with a $1 microcontroller and surrounding peripheral circuits for $15.

    10. Re:Arduino, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except it brings out eight 3.3v unbuffered GPIOs, TX/RX and a full SPI bus(which you could use as more GPIO).

      Somebody has already built an expansion board to provide buffering, plus a bunch of SPI expansion chips.

  4. Unsuitable for teaching by cachimaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This board is perfect if you want to learn to program ARM assembly or cross-compiling but the ARM architecture it's one of the most closed and patent-restricted technologies out there. Teaching ARM is the equivalent to teaching Visual Basic Programming, common but very closed architecture.

    So it's not really open, even if the PCB design is open.

    A truly open system would be OpenRISC, there are dev. boards out there like this one (I'm not affiliated to OpenRISC in any way). They are more expensive because are made with are FPGAs, but that's what you should learn in school.

    Wait until work to learn proprietary stuff.

    1. Re:Unsuitable for teaching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What other $25 Linux boxes are out there for teaching Unix, web programming, and other high level stuff? I don't think teaching ARM assembly was high on their list.

  5. Reality is coming by jmorris42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Dunno, I was in the same camp, no way they would actually ship at the stated prices, expect a doubling which would make it too expensive to be interesting. Or at least less interesting than the many other similar project computers and/or microcontroller products actually shipping. But if they are expecting to begin shipping next month and still holding to the original price they are either really going to pull it off or are truly idiots with zero business sense. I'd give em even odds at this point. :)

    But why is it front page news every time these guys pass gas? If they ship it, that is news. Heck, when they auction off these guys I'd guess that would be news too. But d we need a story every month even when there isn't any actual news to report?

    --
    Democrat delenda est
    1. Re:Reality is coming by ajo_arctus · · Score: 2

      I don't think that's true. I try and follow the project as best I can, and I've not seen that claim made once. The first 100 (this batch) are going to be auctioned on ebay, but that was always the plan. They've got another 9,900 boards that are unpopulated, and if testing of the 100 goes well they'll be populated and sold for $25/$35 in Jan.

    2. Re:Reality is coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      From what I gather - that was more because they had so much demand, they figured it was sensible to use market forces rather than have way more orders than they can handle. Jolly sensible, if you ask me - they get some capital from the initial sales, early buyers can still get it, people who would have bought it early, but don't care *that* much can wait a bit, get it at the advertised price. Better than having them all sold out for the first 4 months, making who gets it a random luck thing, and not gaining from it.

    3. Re:Reality is coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not true. The first 10k batch will be sold at the advertised price. $25 for the Model A and $35 for the Model B.

      100 boards have been made for testing, 10 of those will be auctioned off if they work OK. Once all testing is done, the 10k batch will be ordered. That will be sometime in early January if all goes well.

      The people behind the project have LOTS of experience in running big companies, so that's not an issue. And as for saying this is non-news. Hmm, I would have thought the first boards of what may be a game changing device coming off the production line would be news in most peoples book.

    4. Re:Reality is coming by bcmm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But why is it front page news every time these guys pass gas?

      Mostly because they're being very open about the development process on their blog, meaning you see stories about stages which wouldn't be announced publicly in comparable projects.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  6. Re:no mounting holes by sirnobicus · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the FAQs there will be cases and mounting options just not on initial release. http://www.raspberrypi.org/faqs

  7. Re:Arduino, anyone? NO HDMI ! by redelm · · Score: 2

    The Raz' closest competitor are the plugs (Sheeva, Guru, Pogo-, ...) and they are OK for ssh. Arduino is fine as a microcontroller, but is no GP computer.

    What is unique and very interesting about the Raz is HDMI output. It can easily be a small xterm, or any other app you can compile for ARMv5t and stick on the SD card. Or email / web-browser on the network model. Not fast, but useable.

  8. Bending USB the spec? by dbc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They appear to be bending the USB spec quite seriously. A USB device is allowed to draw up to 100mA before enumeration, and up to 500mA after being enumerated and negotiating for high power. They talk about using up to 700mA with networking connected -- it's not clear to me how it could enumerate without booting first -- so they seem to be giving the middle finger to the USB specs. I predict unhappiness when people find that only some USB power sources are going to tolerate the load.

    Is it so hard to put a couple of holes in the board to solder wire to?

    1. Re:Bending USB the spec? by Kagetsuki · · Score: 2

      As someone who's built USB devices I can tell you it's a gamble anyway. I've seen busses give 500mA without negotiation and I've seen busses that won't put out 500mA after, and I've seen busses where the manufacturer realized people wanted to charge things so they put out something like 1500mA.

      As for devices that plug in to USB but require more than 500mA to run check out the BeagleBoard - it requires more than 500mA to use most peripherals (network) but if you run on anything more than 500mA the thing starts overheating. As for the architecture let's just leave how I think about it as "I actively avoid purchasing devices that use OMAP".

    2. Re:Bending USB the spec? by redelm · · Score: 2

      Half my 6 USB chargers claim 1+A output, the other half 500 mA (older). Who knows what they really do?

      I strongly expect Raz went for USB power to avoid all the national electrical approvals necessary for wallwarts. Remember, this is a shoe-string outfit. Just get a phone charger with someone else' approvals. They probably chose micro- over mini- because the former are more likely to make 700+ (iPod & smartphone draws).

    3. Re:Bending USB the spec? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The charging specification does not require enumeration.

      http://www.usb.org/developers/devclass_docs
      Battery Charging Specification, Revision 1.2
      Section 1.4.7

      Try to keep up.

  9. Re:Arduino, anyone? NO HDMI ! by Nursie · · Score: 2

    The Raz' closest competitor are the plugs (Sheeva, Guru, Pogo-, ...) and they are OK for ssh

    The sheevaplug I have is powerful enough to run Gnome 2 in a vnc session. It also has built in storage and an SD reader.

    "What is unique and very interesting about the Raz is HDMI output"

    That's not unique, the Guruplug Display has HDMI also, though I have no idea if that ever really took off and I have a feeling debian had decided not to support it. It is more poweful than the Pi, and has twice the RAM.

    The unique thing about Rasberry Pi is the proposed price though, with the Guruplug display at $200. Though that does come with a case and power lead, 4 USB slots and two micro-SD readers.

  10. Re:I yawned by Nursie · · Score: 2

    1. My large linux box can't be put into as many places as this, makes a lot more noises and consumes a hell of a lot more power.

    2. You missed the part of the board that exposes all the other GPIO pins on the processor then?

    3. Cheaper than 25 bucks? And I can program them using the languages and runtimes I'm used to? With all the operating system features I have come to know and love? With HDMI output? Sign me up...

    4. And as full systems such as this become cheaper, who will need to bother doing that any more? The embedded space is becoming more and more dominated by systems running linux already, this will only accelerate.

    This is a learning tool for computer science in general, not just embedded programming. You lack imagination.

  11. the real question is by fredan · · Score: 4, Funny

    does it blend?

  12. Re:I yawned by Dan+Dankleton · · Score: 3

    I want a bunch of them, I've got several ideas already. Personally I want one to make into a software defined radio transceiver (hopefully there will be an API to the DSP to do the heavy lifting on this,) I want one to use as a browser in the kitchen for looking at recipes while cooking, and I want one to have on my desk at work as a syslog display machine. To do the first without using a Pi, I'd need to do an awful lot of embedded development myself whereas here a lot of the work has been done already. The recipe browser would be ideal with a cheap tablet (cheap because I'm expecting to spill things on it,) but I've already got spare monitors knocking around so a Pi will be even cheaper. And the Pi is a lot smaller and quieter than a general purpose desktop. The syslog display I currently do on my laptop on a separate monitor, but it would just be easier if it were on a separate machine. £15 is a price that can easily be justified. The market it's supposed to address is education, mainly for programming. It's designed so that kids can mess about with it, install what they want on it and not break the family's computer. It's designed so that kids can have one each instead of having to share one of the school's lab machines. It's designed so that the kids can do work at school and take that work home with them. It's designed to be very difficult to brick, but if it does get broken then the cost of replacing it is not too much.

  13. Re:Vaporware until it is in my hands by Threni · · Score: 2

    Go away. If you've been following the website you'll see they're around 3 weeks behind schedule but have finished the whole design process and are now testing the hardware before mass production. Do you even know what vaporware is?

  14. Insert Obligatory Beowulf Cluster Remark Here... by MrLinuxHead · · Score: 2

    Seriously, I would install a dozen of these type B boards in a case, only use a single power supply, a Ethernet switch and make a low power blade server. I think the power / speed / price ratio would work out. Add a NAS for storage, and you could have a fairly powerful blade for a fraction of the big boys. BOM works out to 12 x 35 = 420. Add a case / PS, Switch. Boot from SD and store everything on a NAS (add extra cost for storage). There's a lot to like about these boards. I think they could be a game changer.

    --
    I may be bad with names, but I'll never forget your IP address