Slashdot Mirror


Mozilla's 3 Big Bets To Keep the Web Open

GMGruman writes "Savio Rodrigues writes that Google's latest agreement with Mozilla will ironically fund three new areas of competition between Google and Mozilla — areas that users and open source advocates should cheer on as they will make the Web both better and more open. The alternative, he says, is more control by the likes of Google, Facebook, and Apple."

5 of 88 comments (clear)

  1. WSJ: $1 Billion Google Windfall for Mozilla by theodp · · Score: 5, Informative

    What Google and Mozilla declined to disclose, reports AllThingsD's Kara Swisher, is that Google will pay just under $300 million per year to be the default choice in Mozillla's Firefox browser, a huge jump from its previous arrangement, due to competing interest from both Yahoo and Microsoft. Sources said this total amount - just under $1 billion - was the minimum revenue guarantee for delivering search queries garnered from consumers using Firefox. Google's main rival in the bid, sources said, was Microsoft's Bing search service."

  2. Re:What? by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No, it's the fact that Apple has a damn-near monopoly on mobile purchases, which are done in their walled garden. This is a big area of user activity, and will become a much bigger area of economic activity. Apple, through iTunes, matters to the Internet. In a bad way, unfortunately.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
  3. Re:The "big" bets: by asa · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not quite as simple as that. A better bulleted list would be:

    1. An alternative to the proprietary mobile stacks which control the full vertical from hardware to app stores. An open Web stack based on real standards.
    2. An alternative to Facebook Connect, Sign in with Twitter, and Google Accounts. A web-wide ID system that doesn't depend on one particular provider.
    3. A set of standards for Web applications discovery, monitization, and installation and an implementation that will work across all platforms.

  4. Re:Please STOP using the word "ironically" by schroedingers_hat · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's ironic how much people using the word irony bothers you.

  5. Re:Please STOP using the word "ironically" by cjb658 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It doesn't mean what you think it means. Please, "ironically" has been massacred enough already. Let's this word rest for a couple of decades, unless you are one of the two people in the world that actually uses it appropriately.

    Ironically, by drawing peoples attention to the word without providing them an explanation of how it ought to be used, YA_Python_dev exacerbated the problem and increased his own suffering...

    Plus he threw everyone who uses that expression under the bus. Literally.