Slashdot Mirror


US Federal Reserve Data On Loans During Crisis Released

oDDmON oUT writes "Pursuant to a FOIA request, Bloomberg has acquired numbers from the Fed on loans made to banks and businesses during the financial crisis between 2007 and 2009. They also posted a direct link to the spreadsheets in zipped format and updated their data visualization of the lending."

9 of 173 comments (clear)

  1. Re:FOIA from the Federal Reserve? by zill · · Score: 4, Informative
    That debate was finished two years ago. Please don't start it again.

    It’s one thing to say that the Federal Reserve is an independent institution. It’s another thing to say that it can keep us all in the dark.

  2. Re:prevented collapse? by shentino · · Score: 2, Informative

    We don't need our deposits protected.

    The FDIC already had that covered and actually makes banks LESS in need of protection, since their most important creditors, the american people who have deposits with them, can't get shafted if the bank goes bankrupt.

    Just let the banks fail already. Having the FDIC cover deposits is all the bailout we need.

  3. Re:Can someone please explain the outrage here? by zill · · Score: 5, Informative

    In other words, they take these low interest loans and buy treasury notes with them. All the interest they earn from the Treasury Department ends up being their profit.

    This is nothing more than common theft really.

  4. Freddie and Fannie losses much more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...than the banks. Looks like only about $100 billion not paid back by banks, but the two government sponsored organizations are expected to have losses approaching $300 billion. SEC is now suing the former CEO's for fraud.

  5. Bloomberg by dokebi · · Score: 5, Informative

    After this and other "bombshell" revelations by Bloomberg this year, they are apparently the only financial news organization worth its salt in the US. Kudos to them, and shame on everyone else (WSJ, FT, Economist, etc etc).

    --
    In Soviet Russia, articles before post read *you*!
  6. Re:prevented collapse? by Subratik · · Score: 5, Informative

    We don't need our deposits protected.

    The FDIC already had that covered and actually makes banks LESS in need of protection, since their most important creditors, the american people who have deposits with them, can't get shafted if the bank goes bankrupt.

    Just let the banks fail already. Having the FDIC cover deposits is all the bailout we need.

    I like how this got promoted to level 5 even though anyone who has taken a brief course in remedial business knows that the FDIC does NOT guarantee insurance on all funds, and for those funds, it is only insured up to 100,000$.

    Have fun getting only 100k or less of your retirement account back :)

    GG, better start reading other blogs

  7. Re:prevented collapse? by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Informative

    The FDIC limit was bumped to $250,000 in 2008. SIPC insures $500,000 of security investments.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  8. To Anyone Who Wants Information by exitcode0 · · Score: 3, Informative
  9. Re:foreign banks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wrong. They have a massive factory in Greenville-Spartanburg South Carolina.