Warner Bros Sued For Pirating Louis Vuitton Trademark
NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "You have to love a case where Warner Brothers, copyright maximalist extraordinaire, gets sued for 'piracy,' in this case for using a knock-off Louis Vuitton bag in a recent movie. This lawsuit has been described as 'awkward' for Warner; I have to agree with that characterization. Louis Vuitton's 22-page complaint (PDF) alleges that Warner Bros. had knowledge that the bag was a knock-off, but went ahead and used it anyway. Apparently Warner Bros. takes IP rights seriously only when its own IP rights are involved."
Now, according to the usual MPAA calculations and the fact that petilions* of people will see that movie, they now must pay Louis Vuitton about 5 zetalions* dollars.
* The MPAA and RIAA aren't the only ones who can come up with stupid numbers.
It is always an intern. It is a little known fact that Lee Harvey Oswald and John Wilkes Booth were intern patsies.
The Warner Bros lawyers are poring over every Louis Vuitton advertisement and product, desperately looking for something to neutralize the issue. Even a stain which is vaguely in the shape of Wile E Coyote would do.
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
No, they will say either 1) "It's not a knock-off; it's a parody." or 2) "We bought the bag, we can use it however we like."
We just got back from a week in LA; you'd be surprised how many of those bags even in Beverly Hills aren't real...
The fun-bags aren't real there either.
Maybe I'm not really a lawyer. Maybe it's just a long nightmare from which I've yet to awaken.
Ray Beckerman +5 Insightful
The best part of those adds is that only people who DIDN'T pirate the DVD had to sit through the stupid thing!
you wouldn't steal a handbag... oh wait.