Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Handing Over Personal Work Without Compensation?

rsmith84 writes "I'm the Senior Systems administrator for a small trade college. When I was hired on, it was strictly for L3 related tasks such as advanced server administration, Exchange design and implementation, etc. They have no in-house programmers, no help desk software, and no budget to purchase one. I'm a moderate PHP and MySQL programmer on the side and am easily capable of writing something to meet their needs, but do not believe I should be A) asked to or B) required to, as my job description and employment terms are not based upon this skill set. I like a challenge, and since all of my goals outlined since my hire date have been met and exceeded, I have a lot of down time. So I wrote the application. It streamlines several critical processes, allows for a central repository of FAQ, and provides end users with access to multiple systems all in one place. I've kept a detailed time log of my work and feel I should be remunerated for the work before just handing over the code. The entire source was developed on personal equipment off company hours. My question is: what should I do? If they are willing to compensate me, I will gladly hand it over. However, it's been mentioned that, if I do the project, it is all but guaranteed that I will see no compensation. The application would streamline a lot of processes and take a lot of the burden off my team, freeing them up to handle what I deem to be more challenging items on their respective punch lists and a better utilization of their time and respective skills. I'm a firm believer in not getting 'something for nothing,' especially when the skills are above my pay grade."

2 of 848 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Have you talked to anyone? by PopeRatzo · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Well, yes. I'm Canadian

    That explains everything.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  2. Re:Have you talked to anyone? by lucm · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Two facts that are obvious to anybody (with experience):

    1. The cost of maintaining the one off custom software will far exceed the cost of buying the canned software. Even assuming competent development. Risk is high.

    2. The boss doesn't have budget to pay for the canned software. He won't have budget to maintain the 'solution' hacked up by the new kid.

    He won't pay the kid for the software. That's a given.

    The question is: Should the kid find a new job if the boss if fool enough to accept the software under any terms? I say yes, such a boss will teach the kid only bad habits.

    I've seen that kind of behavior before. I call it "entitlement". If I was his boss, I would immediately initiate a very careful and prudent plan to get rid of him because he looks like the kind of individual that will ssh in and change root passwords, FC zoning, etc. when he gets fired because he will feel cheated.

    The only cure I know for entitlement is a stint in the military or having your wife leaving you for a girl.

    --
    lucm, indeed.