Slashdot Mirror


Court Rules Website Immune From Suit For Defamatory Posting

NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "RipoffReport.com contained an admittedly defamatory posting, by one of its users, about a person who operated a Florida corporation providing addiction treatment services. Although the site was asked by the poster herself to remove the post, it refused. A Florida appeals court has ruled that the site is absolutely immune from suit (pdf), and cannot even be directed to remove the offending post, since under the Communications Decency Act (47 USC 230) 'no cause of action may be brought' against a provider of an "interactive computer service" based upon information provided by a 3rd party."

3 of 171 comments (clear)

  1. I Just Can't Belive It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Although the site was asked by the poster herself

    Wow. I mean ... it's almost as if some hyper-emotional female was spreading rumors and causing drama and regretted it only when it finally caused real trouble.

    We all know this never, ever happens. Women are never petty and catty, they are always calm and rational and in control of the feelings they value so much, and above all they always take their problems directly to the party with which they have a dispute and would never do something childish like gossip behind their backs.

    Glad that's settled.

    1. Re:I Just Can't Belive It by Catskul · · Score: 2, Funny

      I really don't understand why this has been moderated as funny. I was under the impression that the Slashdot crowd was more high brow than angsty teen woman bashing.

      Apparently not? At least the fool was wise enough to do it anonymously.

      --

      Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
    2. Re:I Just Can't Belive It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bashing would imply false information simply meant to insult. Which bit of data do you find not factual?