Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Verizon Backtracks On $2 Convenience Fee

Posted by Soulskill on from the people-have-spoken dept.

Velcroman1 writes with a followup to yesterday's news that Verizon would be implementing a $2 'convenience fee' for certain online and phone-based bill payments. In addition to dealing with outrage from customers, Verizon also felt resistance from the Federal Communications Commission, who decided they would investigate the matter. Today, in a brief press release, Verizon announced that they've canceled their plans for the new fee in response to customer feedback.

7 of 281 comments (clear)

  1. Don't you love asshats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That charge you for the privilege of paying your damn bill! GAHHHH!!!!!

    1. Re:Don't you love asshats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Really it was just a thinly veiled attempt to force customers onto their auto-pay system because if you switched to auto-pay they waived the fee.

    2. Re:Don't you love asshats by Fnord666 · · Score: 5, Informative

      It seems you're correct. If that's the case, there are literally hundreds of convenience stores and gas stations around here that are violating their merchant agreements. Maybe I ought to make a weekend event out of reporting as many of them as I can to VISA...

      I ask the merchant if they are allowed to charge a % fee for using a credit card. When they say that they can, get them to itemize it on the bill of sale. Once you have that, dispute the fee with your credit card company and get them to reverse that part of the transaction. Worked every time so far.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  2. Big Red Will Still Get Their 2 bucks by greyline · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They may have backtracked on this "convenience fee", but Verizon will still get their $2 from their customers, just not as obviously.

  3. great by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have not canceled my offer for them to lick my asshole.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  4. And... by Pharmboy · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...they will no doubt try to make themselves looks a hero for not screwing us over by adding that charge. Yes, us. I was already looking at other carriers, only for the principle of charging us more for costing them less.

    This is as bad as when the phone company charged $4 a month for "touch tone service" when it actually costs them less to provide it than to deal with pulse dialing.

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    1. Re:And... by Obfuscant · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is as bad as when the phone company charged $4 a month for "touch tone service" when it actually costs them less to provide it than to deal with pulse dialing.

      Back when this was a regular charge, it did cost more to provide touch tone dialing. They had to add the DTMF-to-pulse decoders to existing systems. About the time that the old step-by-step hardware was replaced by something more modern (crossbar) and the pulse decoding became the more expensive part, the special charge for DTMF was removed.