Slashdot Mirror


Edison Would Have Loved New Light Bulb Law, Says His Great-Grandson

New submitter futuristic writes with a link to Thomas Edison's great-grandson's take on Thomas Edison and the alleged demise of the incandescent light bulb. From the article: "My great grandfather's 100-watt incandescent will be replaced with new energy-efficient versions, including CFLs, LEDs, and — yes — new and improved incandescent bulbs. ... And my great-grandfather wouldn't have it any other way."

5 of 473 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It isn't old vs new technology, it was where he could make the most. I'm sure he'd love the new laws....if he could make a buck from them.

  2. Re:Bullshit by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You mean Washington, DC? Because you can't do half of the things with direct current that are possible with AC. And I don't mean Anonymous Cowards. AND DC is in fact way more dangerous than AC, especially if the AC frequency is very high.

    --
    Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
  3. Re:Bullshit by icebraining · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You mean, my light bulbs composed of LEDs? Yes, they're DC.

  4. Re:FP? by JWSmythe · · Score: 5, Insightful

        Heh. That's pretty much what I was going to say.. If he had the patent(s) on it, he'd praise it as the best thing since ... well ... the light bulb. If he didn't, he'd be pushing all the reasons that it was horrible and dangerous.

        That's the way he played.. Otherwise, we would be praising the successor to the Joseph Swan light bulb.

        Patents are a bitch, and Edison was the original patent troll.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  5. Re:Bullshit by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What bullshit. Anybody who wants to pay more in taxes can at any time do so, without be compelled to do so. ... The only fucking reason this hypocrite pays less taxes is because he sets out to do so from the beginning.

    No, THAT is the real bullshit. There is no contradiction between using "loopholes" and simultaneously wanting the loopholes to be taken out of the system because the simple fact of it is that there is no such thing as a loophole - only legal and illegal actions. Buffet explicitly wants the capital gains tax rate to be increased such that taking his income as dividends instead of earned income won't save him or his cronies from the higher tax rates that regular people pay.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.