Slashdot Mirror


Online Clearinghouse Offers To Defend Privacy

jfruhlinger writes "Privacy may have become a hot-button issue in the Internet age, but the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse has been fighting against corporate privacy violations for 20 years now. Today, they've launched an online complaint center that will hopefully help keep your private data private. Fill out the online form and the PRC will follow up with the privacy compliance officer at the company in question, or investigate whether a complaint to a government agency is in order."

9 of 30 comments (clear)

  1. Funded by? by vlm · · Score: 4, Funny

    It would be hilarious if they were funded by selling your privacy report data for marketing purposes.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    1. Re:Funded by? by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Informative

      As best as I can trace their history, it looks like they come from the generic consumer-advocacy nonprofit space. I believe they were set up in the 1990s as a project of the Utility Consumers' Action Network, a San-Diego-based organization that mainly distributes information about utility services to the general public, as well as advocating for public-friendly policies. One of the utilities they traditionally monitored were the phone companies, and with the rise of the internet in the 1990s, they started collecting and distributing information about ISPs, and more generally some information about how to use the internet without getting scammed/etc. Seems to have later spun off into an independent or semi-independent group.

    2. Re:Funded by? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Trepidity is correct. The Privacy Rights Clearinghouse (PRC) is a program of the Utility Consumer's Action Network (UCAN). UCAN is a 501-c-3 nonprofit, which means we get our funding from donations and grants. Beth Givens is our founder and director: http://www.privacyrights.org/about_us.htm#staff. We do not sell consumer data. Our privacy policy is at http://www.privacyrights.org/policy.htm.

  2. Naming fail? by hedwards · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not really sure that I would trust the PRC to keep my private information private, I mean the Chinese government isn't exactly known for respect of the individual.

  3. My complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was going to file a complaint against every website on the internet that requires a "registration" in order to use the fucking thing and then I clicked on the online form link and decided against it.

    When you collect information on people, it will be abused. Somehow, someday, somewhere ... some entity, usually corporate, will get a hold of it and use it to your detriment. The entire credit industry is a perfect example of this. And they spawned the corporate Big Brother, ChoicePoint, that our government uses to spy on Americans to get around that pesky Constitution and the "activist" judiciary.

    Another example is the health insurance industry. Get prescribed an anti-depressant for any reason you become uninsurable. How do they know? Pharmacies share all that data about your prescriptions with the insurance companies, among others.

    Goddamn them all.

    1. Re:My complaint by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Informative

      I was going to file a complaint against every website on the internet that requires a "registration" in order to use the fucking thing and then I clicked on the online form link and decided against it.

      In bold text on that page: "You do not have to register to file a complaint."

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  4. consistency of action and voice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does anyone actually care about privacy any more? I do, but I also act to preserve mine.

    As far as I can tell, 99.9% of the population does not care one whit. They'll cheerfully give all their private data to Facebook to sell to whoever wants it. They'll let google track their entire online presence and behavior through google analytics (or facebook through the "like" button). They'll load adverts and run javascripts from web pages that track them. They'll use supermarket tracking/discount cards. They won't encrypt their emails and IMs. They'll give all their personal data to a big telecom in exchange for a few hundred dollars/euros off a phone. They'll collectively push the internet away from its former open and anarchistic nature into proprietary, censorable for-profit communications like Twitter/FB, letting a few companies know everything about everybody. Sure, some few of ppls *claim* they value privacy, but you can tell what a person really thinks by their actions not their words. And the actions are clear: they are cheerfully willing to give up their privacy in exchange for a little convenience.

    You use FB? You don't care about your privacy. You have a contract phone? You don't care about your privacy. You don't HAVE to have one, but you decided not to support the alternatives such as anonymous prepaid phones.

    Almost nobody cares about privacy. That's the only conclusion one can make by watching their behaviors. And as long as almost nobody cares, the war to retain privacy can only be lost.

    1. Re:consistency of action and voice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree... kind of. But otoh, I think you are being a bit overzealous in your claims.

      I use facebook - but I do not post anything and everything to my facebook. And even though my facebook is "friends only" I only really post stuff to facebook that I would not care if it were 100% public.

      For example, I do not share my daily schedule with facebook. I do not post my financials or mortgage information. I do not post floor plans of my home, my property size or value. I do not post my private medical records, what prescriptions i may take, what cell phone plan I have, where i use my phone the most. I do not regularly "check in" to locations to share where I am, and I do not constantly share everything I read on slashdot, or elsewhere.

      The implication that use of any of the mentioned services, such as facebook, and desire to maintain privacy, are mutually exclusive is bunk, at best.

  5. Re:Did my first reporting by Myopic · · Score: 3, Funny

    Holy shit, dude, are you dredging up stories from two Presidents ago? It is long past time for you to update your tropes. Next thing, you'll talk about how Duke Nukem Forever will never be released.