Slashdot Mirror


Ohm's Law Survives To the Atomic Level

Hugh Pickens writes "Moore's Law, the cornerstone of the semiconductor industry, may get a reprieve from its predicted demise. As wires shrink to just nanometers in diameter, their resistivity tends to grow exponentially, curbing their usefulness as current carriers. But now a team of researchers has shown that it is possible to fabricate low-resistivity nanowires at the smallest scales imaginable by stringing together individual atoms in silicon as small as four atoms (about 1.5 nanometers) wide and a single atom tall. The secret is to introduce phosphorus along that line because each phosphorus atom donates an electron to the silicon crystal, which promotes electrical conduction. They then encase the nanowires entirely in silicon, which makes the conduction electrons more immune to outside influence. By embedding phosphorus atoms within a silicon crystal with an average spacing of less than 1 nanometer, the team achieved a diameter-independent resistivity, which demonstrates ohmic scaling to the atomic limit. 'That moves the wires away from the surfaces and away from other interfaces,' says physicist says Michelle Simmons. 'That allows the electron to stay conducting and not get caught up in other interfaces.' The wires have the carrying capacity of copper, indicating that the technique might help microchips continue their steady shrinkage over time and may even extend the life of Moore's Law. 'Fundamentally, we have shown that we can maintain low resistivities in doped silicon wires down to the atomic scale,' says Simmons, adding that it may not be ready for production now, but, 'who knows 20 years from now?'"

10 of 104 comments (clear)

  1. ohmigod by alphatel · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the atomic resistance gather together at ohm's law, will they occupy it?

    --
    When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
  2. Re:Just a rant by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Funny

    At what point will we stop hearing about it?

    When you stop reading a site dedicated to geeks, computer professionals and computer enthusiasts.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  3. This just in from a GOP spokesperson: by Patron · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of course it's valid. It's a law! Not some phony-baloney "theory" like evolution or gravity.

    1. Re:This just in from a GOP spokesperson: by rossdee · · Score: 3, Funny

      Heres a question to ask the Republican candidates for President:

      If elected will you repeal Moore's Law?

      (Unfortunately Herman Caine is no longer in the race, because he would probably repeal Cole's Law (after all thats served with KFC, not Godfathers
      pizza)

  4. Hot Iron and a Steady Hand... by shoemakc · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hate to have to solder one :-)

    --
    --an unbreakable toy is useful for breaking other toys--
  5. Re:But will... by captainpanic · · Score: 2, Funny

    You are such a pessimist, saying that in order to make money, something should actually keep to the laws of fundamental physics.

    That was meant as a sarcastic joke, but while writing it down, I fear it might actually be true. There are plenty of scams out there.

  6. Re:Just a rant by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seeing that the doubling power in Moore's Law is seen in almost all technological progression, you're going to hear about it a lot more. Probably about twice as much every year or so.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  7. Re:Ohm's Law by drainbramage · · Score: 5, Funny

    Coles Law is my favorite.
    Yummy.

    --
    No brain, no pain.
  8. Re:Just a rant by neokushan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Isn't the first law of Thermodynamics that you don't talk about Thermodynamics?

    ....sorry.

    --
    +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
  9. Re:Just a rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, fair enough, but what about Slashdot?