NYC Mayor Bloomberg Vows To Learn To Code In 2012

theodp writes "New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has announced his intention to take a coding class in 2012 via Twitter ('My New Year's resolution is to learn to code with Codecademy in 2012! Join me.'). So, is this just a PR coup for Codeacademy, or could EE grad (Johns Hopkins, '64) Bloomberg — who parlayed the $10 million severance he received after being fired as head of systems development at Solomon Brothers into his $19.5 billion Bloomberg L.P. fortune — actually not know how to program? Seems unlikely, but if so, perhaps Bloomberg should just apply to be a Bloomberg Summer 2012 Software Development intern — smart money says he'd get the gig!"

Comments

Cobol

[Anonymous Coward]

Maybe he wants to know how to code in something besides cobol and fortran.

Re:Cobol

[Kristian T.]

Fortran isn't that bad, considering it's from 1957. Anyone who can do Fortran, could learn C++ very quickly, [begin rant] Cobol on the other hand was a step backwards the day it appeared in 1959, and it's creators should be bludgeoned with a frozen fish for even writing the design document. And yes - I've written tons of Cobol - it doesn't grow on you. It's probably the first example of the fundamental misconception, that it's desirable (if even possible) to make formal descriptions using informal language. The MBA's still think you can describe a piece of software in Word, and then it's a trivial process to make the software that customers want. Informal language is desirable to humans because it supports leaving out details - which is exactly what makes it useless for programming a computer. Using the word "plus" in stead of the symbol "+" is completely missing that fundamental point.[end rant]

Re:Cobol

[Grishnakh]

Funny, but even this is ignoring reality. Accord to TFA summary, he was a EE grad in 1964. While those languages do indeed date back that far, EE students were probably not taught them at the time, and in fact probably weren't taught any programming at all, as that was a different discipline (CS). Even when I went to undergrad EE school in the early 1990s, we were only taught a little QBASIC, FORTRAN, C++, MATLAB (1/2 semester each), and x86 assembly language (full semester). There was some more in the junior/senior classes, but only if you elected to take those, and it was all concentrated on microcontroller and embedded programming. Back in the mid-60s, I imagine programming simply wasn't considered important for EEs, and that any EEs who ended up working on computers (which were room-size and mega-expensive at the time) would learn any necessary programming on the job. The fundamentals of EE simply don't include programming; they include network theory (Ohm's and Kirchoff's Laws), electromagnetics (Maxwell's equations), 3-phase power, etc. It's only been in very recent years (early/mid-90s and later) where they came up with the "computer engineering" degrees, or put the two together ("electrical and computer engineering" or ECE like at one university I went to).

Re:Cobol

[c 0xFF]

He'll have to learn APL, or at least Perl. After all, he's going "to take a coding class in 2012 via Twitter." Anything else and the program won't fit in a single tweet!

[rimshot]

Re:Cobol

[zarlino]

The MBA's still think you can describe a piece of software in Word, and then it's a trivial process to make the software that customers want. Informal language is desirable to humans because it supports leaving out details - which is exactly what makes it useless for programming a computer.

That's because software *is* the description of what the computer should do. Check this great article: http://www.osnews.com/story/22135/The_Problem_with_Design_and_Implementation

He was never a programmer

[tomalpha]

Mike Bloomberg was always the business/sales guy at the company. Tom Secunda was (one of the) original programmer of the first terminals. That was all in Fortran back then. A fair chunk of it probably still is. You can read this and oh so much more in his not-very-gripping autobiography, which was required reading for all team leads and managers at Bloomberg. [Ex Bloomberger].

Head of systems development?

[nurb432]

So? Just beacuse you manage a department doesn't mean you can do the work they are doing. He was there to manage people, not code.. a vastly different skill set.

Sure, its nice if you can do the job of your people, so you can have a deeper understanding of what is going on, but its not a requirement.

Re:Head of systems development?

[Asic Eng]

According to BBC, the reaction of the London mayor was that he's too busy for things like that.

That's completely wrong. The BBC actually reports [...] the mayor is in awe of his good friend Michael Bloomberg, and if re-elected will explore whether he can join him on that course. I believe you got Boris Johnson (current mayor) confused with Ken Livingstone (former mayor and current candidate for the opposing party). Ken Livingstone stated If I'm elected, I'll be a bit too busy to take any education courses.

Anyway, it's certainly nice if politicians broaden their minds, but it's reasonable that they have to allocate their time and set priorities.

They don't make programming tools like they use to

[LostCluster]

Common in the 60s: Punch cards, text only dumb terminals, mainframes...
Common Now: Online storage, visual designers, client/server setups....

If your knowledge of computers ends in the 60s. there's a lot of updating to be done. Mayor Bloomberg has the right idea... every 10 years or so it's time to retrain to the current tools.

Re:Bloomberg on the Internet in 2001

[betterunixthanunix]

Frankly, given the line of business he was in -- rapid news delivery to investors -- I am inclined to agree with him about the Internet. Delays on the network could translate into millions of dollars in losses for Bloomberg's customers, which could translate to millions in losses for Bloomberg. From a business perspective it made sense.

Why was this mod'ed "Funny"?

[Anonymous Coward]

If you look at just about all tech companies, the person who got it going was the sales guy. In some cases the tech guy is also a great salesman - Larry Ellison of Oracle or Zuckerberg of Facebook - actually, FB is just a marketing data collection company.

In my years in software development, I've seen some really great ideas and implementations just get burried because the geek didn't know how to sell it's value.

All the tech bigshots knew how or knew someone who knew how to sell the value of their stuff.

Wozniak had the luck of having God's gift of salesmenship, Steve Jobs, as his friend. All the gazillionaire techies had someone with them that had the contacts and sales ability to take their idea and make it into something.

"Build a better mousetrap and the World will beat a path to your door" is a lie. The countless examples of inferior technology ruling the marketplace is proof.

My first program

[jacobsm]

10 Print "I've got lots of money"
20 goto 10
30 end

Re:Fortran & COBOL are ok... apk

[Grishnakh]

Should I use COBOL or ForTran (Formula Translator)?

No, it's "FORTRAN". While it does indeed stand for "formula translator", back in those days they didn't use CamelCase, and making portmanteaus and then writing them in all caps was normal. You can still see it in US military acronyms, such as "USCENTCOM" (US Central Command).

According to Wikipedia, they didn't start using camelcase for programming language names until the 1970s, and it only became fashionable for company names in the 80s.

Perl!

[RobertRCleveland]

Bloomberg should learn Perl. That'll make him ready for the Presidency! :)

Re:Much rather

[PPH]

I'd much rather he learn empathy, humility, and how to not be a giant fucking jackass.

Well then, learning to code is definitely NOT the way to go.

good example of lifelong learning

[peter303]

Always learn new things in life since technology evolves so fast. I feel sorry for my co-workers to refuse to learn on their own because it would cost them some time or money.

Re:C/C++ is pretty bad place to start learning

[lightknight]

I think C++ is a good starting point simply because it teaches memory management and class design.

Understanding the concept of a class is one of the most difficult programming concepts a novice will encounter. And they are used everywhere.

Just try explaining the concept of a class to a non-programmer. I will bet money that they will nod their heads, and still have no idea what you're talking about.

And memory management -> something you need to understand, even if you use a garbage collector.

If he's just taking a programming class to get a taste (dilettante) for programming, then by all means teach him Visual Basic or JavaScript or whatever. However, if he's taking a programming class to learn programming (he wants the programmer skillset a.k.a. a real programmer), then C++ is where he wants to be. Once you understand the concepts in C++ (which can be brutal / metal when it comes to learning), the hardest part of learning how to program is past.

Why, do you ask? Because otherwise you end up in sad scenarios, like when the PhDs in your Computer Science department do not know how to install an operating system, when the undergrads in your class have difficulty understanding the difference between an AMD processor and an Intel processor, or why one should never write a program in JavaScript that consumes 8 GB of the client computer's memory.

TLDR; C++ will expose him to the greatest number of programming concepts in the shortest period of time, and give him the minimal amount of understanding necessary to eventually grow into a respected programmer.

Re:Even today

[superwiz]

Bloomberg terminals now operate over the internet if I'm not mistaken.

They can encapsulate their feed over the Internet, but that limits functionality and requires extra login steps. The standard setup is over their own network. It's has extra security (including protection against Van Eck phreaking of the terminal itself). What you get in the browser is a very, very, very limited subset of functionality of what the terminal itself provides. Although the terminal itself, as an interface, has all the usability level of a cash register.

Re:C/C++ is pretty bad place to start learning

[Andrevan]

Why do CS PhDs, who spend 98% doing theory (math), need to know anything about installing an OS? Why do undergrads, who probably use preassembled OEM boxes, need to understand the differences between hardware brands? More to the point, how does learning memory management or class design through C++ help one learn these things? To address a less ridiculous point, if I'm spending all my time in Java, Ruby or Python, why do I need to understand anything about pointers and memory management in C? For the sake of argument, let's say we need to understand how the stack, heap, and reference variables work in a garbage collected language. Why do we need to learn C to do that? In undergrad I was required to take a class which involved writing one's own implementation of malloc. Like so many other classes required for a CS degree, I use nothing from it in my day-to-day work as a Ruby developer.