Slashdot Mirror


Comcast DNSSEC Goes Live

An anonymous reader writes "In a blog post, Comcast's Jason Livingood has announced that Comcast has signed all of its (5000+) domains in addition to having all of its customers using DNSSEC-validating resolvers. He adds, 'Now that nearly 20 million households in the U.S. are able to use DNSSEC, we feel it is an important time to urge major domain owners, especially commerce and banking-related sites, to begin signing their domain names.'"

3 of 165 comments (clear)

  1. Just in time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There won't be much point to this if SOPA / PIPA passes, requires DNS redirects, and bans circumvention.

  2. Re:How about going back to flat-rate data? by Anthony+Mouse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nice, one can get to their absurd caps that much faster. Get rid of the caps and perhaps there might be something worth talking about.

    DNSSEC is fine by itself, but it is only a distraction as implemented by Comcast.

    Troll rating: 8/10. It was a good, subtle effort. You get people off topic, since data caps are highly contentious and Comcast is unpopular so that will gather several responses, and extra points for getting the first post so that no one with an on-topic post can precede you. In addition to that, you picked a topic that might otherwise have led somewhere productive, because of the tie in between DNSSEC and SOPA (which is an important, relevant, and time-sensitive topic at this point). You may wish to apply for remuneration with pro-SOPA entities if you have not done so already, as they are known to pay compensation for such efforts.

  3. Re:How about going back to flat-rate data? by Anthony+Mouse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is there really a tie in mechanism with DNSSEC?

    It is widely understood that SOPA will break DNSSEC, because it requires intermediaries to modify DNS responses, which looks to DNSSEC like a man in the middle attack (because it is one).