Slashdot Mirror


US Research Open Access In Peril

luceth writes "Several years ago, the U.S. National Institutes of Health instituted a policy whereby publications whose research was supported by federal funds were to be made freely accessible a year after publication. The rationale was that the public paid for the research in the first place. This policy is now threatened by legislation introduced by, you guessed it, a Congresswoman who is the largest recipient of campaign contributions from the scientific publishing industry. The full text of the bill, H.R. 3699, is available online."

4 of 237 comments (clear)

  1. US Research Open Access only in Perl by JonySuede · · Score: 2, Funny

    I read that as: US Research Open Access only in Perl

    --
    Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
    1. Re:US Research Open Access only in Perl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whoosh stupid mod, perl and write only are almost always synonymous....

  2. Re:dufus decisions by hey! · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, Elsevier is a Dutch company, and the Netherlands has a GINI quotient of 0.650 against the USA's 0.801. Which reminds me of what my old Bolshie Uncle Ivan used to say. He said, "Kid, nobody believes in socialism. Nobody believes in capitalism either. It's socialism for *me*, capitalism for *you*."

    Anyhow, to be fair, Rep. Maloney was only helping out a constituent [1].

    -----
    1: constituent: n. A person, firm or other entity which pays for or hires the services of an elected official.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  3. Re:On the positive side, by gmhowell · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm not sure which is worse: all of our government are whores, or all of our government are cheap whores.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon