Slashdot Mirror


China Internet Users Hit Half a Billion

angry tapir writes "China's Internet population passed the half billion mark at the end of 2011 after the country added 28 million new users during the second half of the year. At the end of December, the country had 513 million Internet users, according to a report issued Monday by the China Internet Network Information Center. The number of users accessing the Internet from their mobile phones has also grown, reaching 355 million — more than the entire population of the U.S."

85 comments

  1. Nice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So.. What do they look at exactly? Just post pictures of each other and talk about how much they heart china?

    1. Re:Nice. by flyneye · · Score: 1

      No, the article says they "hit half a billion" this suggests they are very violent.
      In China mothers don't teach that "hitting isn't nice".

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  2. For the last time by Moheeheeko · · Score: 4, Funny

    I dont care if there are Half a billion of you, I DONT WANT YOUR FUCKING GOLD.

    1. Re:For the last time by migla · · Score: 1

      >I dont care if there are Half a billion of you, I DONT WANT YOUR FUCKING GOLD.

      I understand your frustration, but really, don't blame the relatively poor chinese people working for some boss/owner exploiting that market opportunity.

      The fault is in the system.

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    2. Re:For the last time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the chinese-speaking portion of the internet is the second largest after the english-speaking one and as such it is likely to have useful information that cannot be found anywhere else in the world, but you have to learn Chinese to be able to grub it. Maybe that's what you meant?

  3. I know. My spam logs show it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I run www.gotonicaragua.com and about 70% of our spam comes from China; the other 30% comes from Russia. We've had to blacklist both those domains flat out in order to keep the site running. Heavy handed, I know, but screw it ... not many continental Chinese are looking to travel to Nicaragua as far as I know, and the amount of garbage they were posting on the site made it too much to deal with. Always flogging cheap luxury goods, watches, boots, stuff I don't even recognize. Sometimes in the signature line, sometimes via copied forum text with dozens of links pasted in.

    Hi China, welcome to the internet. Stay the frik off of my site, thankyaverymuch.

    1. Re:I know. My spam logs show it. by Lillebo · · Score: 2

      Parent, meet Captcha.

    2. Re:I know. My spam logs show it. by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1

      I run www.gotonicaragua.com and about 70% of our spam comes from China; the other 30% comes from Russia.

      And on this site, the spam comes from Nicaragua.

      We've had to blacklist both those domains flat out in order to keep the site running.

      What spam ever comes from a real domain? It is always faked, so there is no point in blacklisting a domain.

    3. Re:I know. My spam logs show it. by Calos · · Score: 1

      That defeats robots, not hordes of cheap labor.

      In other words, you've missed the point.

      --
      I vote based on politicians' actions, unless contrary to my preconceptions. Often wrong, never uncertain. #iamthe99%
    4. Re:I know. My spam logs show it. by Calos · · Score: 1

      S/he didn't mean website domain, but the top-level domain. I think s/he blocked all of .cn and .ru.

      --
      I vote based on politicians' actions, unless contrary to my preconceptions. Often wrong, never uncertain. #iamthe99%
    5. Re:I know. My spam logs show it. by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1

      What difference does that make? If you can fake your domain then you can make yourself appear to come from any country in the world.

  4. Re:...and not a fuck was given in the First World. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and a product of capitalism, and freedom and liberation and education...

    wanna bitch, go investigate verison or the bell(s) around the world... fuggg... even hear they're looking for people (pay you to do it).

    lol

  5. Productivity takes a dive by tsotha · · Score: 1

    Well, that's the end of China's economy.

  6. how many are bots/government agents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, you gotta figure a significant fraction of the 500 million are patrolling for various bits of information. Some of them are actual people and others are just spiders/bots...so what do you put the ratios, bots/person and spies/person, at?

    I'm guessing 10% are actively spying for the government.

  7. All those people... by joren02 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... And they only have about 330 million IPv4 addresses. I mean, even with the abuse of large scale NAT they must be getting in serious problems.

    1. Re:All those people... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      Never mind the IP addresses, I wondered if they were running out of Chinese names, and found this: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1554330/Too-many-Wangs-as-China-runs-out-of-names.html

      Is mistaken identity a problem on the Internet there . . . ?

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:All those people... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Assuming my calculations are correct, they can get over 2bn address just using Class A addresses. So internally they have enough to give every resident up to 2 IP addresses. Now they have a couple ISPs that operate and so they would presumably have their own pool of IPs that they'd be using on their networks so they shouldn't have any trouble doubling or more those addresses.

      When all is said and done, I don't see any particular reason why they would be any more NATed up than the rest of the world.

      What's more there's still a bunch of folks on dial up connections or without any connection at all. Of course I could be off in my figures and I could be underestimating broadband penetration in China.

    3. Re:All those people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Is mistaken identity a problem on the Internet there . . . ?

      Is it a problem here? I'm sure there's quite a few John Smiths out there.

      Assuming you need to use your real name, you'd still have to make your own unique username afterwards for most anything. And if it were something really important, China also has a Resident ID Card where everyone has their own unique ID number similar to the US and SSNs.

    4. Re:All those people... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Most people in the USA have duplicate first+last name....if you live in US, put your name here: http://howmanyofme.com/ Only 3 people have my first + last name

      There are 3,100 surnames in common use in China, the traditional "100 names" do include majority of populace though

    5. Re:All those people... by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 1

      They have been moving to IPv6 for some time -- http://www.ipv6.org.au/09ipv6summit/talks/OrcunTezel.pdf. Since China uses the same types of routers and DNS servers as the rest of the world (many of them copied), it could not efficiently use the 4,294,967,296 address space as a huge NAT'd network. It would be far easier to use IPv6, which can identify each node by region, city, organization, domain, even by a MAC address. IPv6 is a great way to run a country-wide Internet. Once they are done, China will be the network model for every multi-national corporation and most governments.

    6. Re:All those people... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      As of seven years ago including last year I was visiting my in-laws in Shanghai, my wife's parents were still behind a double NATed. Often Skype connections could get spontainiously dropped. Same goes for google talk and any other P2P based application. They seriously need to roll out IPv6 ASAP! They shouldn't wait for the rest of the world. Just dive right in.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    7. Re:All those people... by bmorency · · Score: 1

      Most people in the USA have duplicate first+last name....if you live in US, put your name here: http://howmanyofme.com/ Only 3 people have my first + last name

      Does anyone know of a site like this for other countries? I live in canada and just wanted to check it out. Just for the heck of it I entered my name into the site above and it came back as 1 or fewer with my first and last name.

    8. Re:All those people... by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 1

      Well, obviously China has too many Wangs. How do you think they got to more than a billion people in the first place? By having too many storks?

    9. Re:All those people... by zidium · · Score: 1

      There are 45,240 people with my name. Many have the same middle initial.

      At a hospital in Houston, where I go, there's two of us with the exact same name, born on the same day, at the same hospital, and our social security numbers are offset by 3 numbers (just 1 digit). It's very confusing and I get a ton of bills directed for that guy.

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
    10. Re:All those people... by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      You know I'm sure some people think you could never have too many wangs. Know what I'm sayin? YeahhhhhhhhnnnnnnggggggGGGGGGGG

    11. Re:All those people... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I think the bulk of the growth in China has been in IPv6, and there are a whole bunch of Chinese sites not accessable by IPv4.

  8. Density by omganton · · Score: 3, Funny

    Half a million internet users browsing the 6 sites they're allowed to visit.

    1. Re:Density by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Posting anonymously because I already have moderations in here ...

      The Great Firewall of China isn't nearly as severe as people in the US seem to think -- I was surprised how little problem I had accessing places on the "public" Internet in China. Some staples are blocked, like Facebook, but generally I didn't have any serious issues. And most big companies and hotels have VPN access out of the country which bypasses everything. It seems everyone knows someone who has access to them.

      Is it restricted? Yes. Is it a HUGE market with a massive amount of people, spending huge amounts of money? Yup. And its a nearly ubiquitous form of communication for more people than live in the US. And, unlike the US which has pretty broad access to the Internet, in China, that demographic overlaps the 400+ million middle class people. The commercial market dwarfs anything here.

    2. Re:Density by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      6 sites?

      is that due to being restricted to 3 from column A and 3 from column B?

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    3. Re:Density by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was in China about 4 years ago, and didn't find the "Great Firewall" to be all that either. In the same way that the original Great Wall didn't keep out invading hordes, the new one doesn't effectively filter subversive thoughts. Wikipedia was blocked, as I recall. Most British news sources were inaccessible too. However, you could reach most US news sources such as the NY Times. Google results were clearly tampered with when it came to sensitive subjects such as Falon Gong or Tiananmen Square, but on the whole, you could find an almost infinite variety of viewpoints.

      In fact, maybe it's time that China stop bothering with leaky firewalls and follow the Western model of media manipulation: Simply repeat lies to compliant news outlets until they become truth.

    4. Re:Density by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did your search results for "Tiananmen Square" and "Wukan Protests" turn out?

  9. Fake statistics by happyhamster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Quote:
    >> according to a report issued Monday by the China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC), a non-profit group with ties to the government.

    As the article itself notes, "Analysts, however, have said the statistics provided by the CNNIC are inflated."

    Like all statistical data from China, this info is likely inflated and cannot be trusted. Chinese culture considers cheating to be fine and a smart thing to do. Multiply that by the Chinese government's desire to improve its image at any cost, and you get useless numbers which have been wildly twisted to provide the desired result. It appears that this time they tried to reach that magical psychological barrier of "Half a Billion".

    1. Re:Fake statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember that everything we read, is just as much fake and propganda. It's just that in the US, people still buy the "Fair and balanced" lie (EU too) and believe in things like "absolute facts" for things that can neither be mathematically proven, nor be observed. (I'll explain:)

      Example: We can check that we went to the moon, using the mirror they left there, so everyone for himself can call it a fact, provided he trusts his laser. (Or even use a telescope and look at it himself.) We can however, not check how many Internet users there are in China. Unless the ISP servers are yours and we trust them. We can only trust our individual "reliable sources".

      The problem is, that life-forms with brains normally define "reliable" as "fits my inner model of reality" and "trusted source" as "was consistent with itself and did fit my inner model of reality in the past".
      Note how nothing in there mentions any actual relationship to reality. This is not bad or good. It's just how we are built to work. For a reason.
      The relationship to reality is simply implied. Because for healthy individuals, their model of reality is, for all normal cases, equal to their observed reality. Because they did observe the thing themselves, can logically reason that it is correct, or at least learned it from peers who did the observing and are truly trustworthy

      And the problem with that is: Most people today get their perception of "reality" from TV (read: paid social engineers) or flat-out ignore it because they can't cope with the situation, like with religious schizophrenia. (Not meant in a derogatory way. Like a injury or infection, it's a disease, and it needs care, love and support. Not hatred.)

      So please, I know this this Slashdot, but unless we checked this yourself, let's not comment either way, and concentrate on highlighting that all that input in all those FAs are not to be trusted, OK? Let's instead care about things that we can actually influence, to improve our lives. Because this here only influences the lives of our enemies. No matter which imaginary "side" you lean to. OK? :)

    2. Re:Fake statistics by zidium · · Score: 1

      It's not possible with modern optics to view the presumed Moon landing sites with any telescope currently in existence, for various claimed reasons.

      Otherwise, I could guaran-fucking-tee you there'd be pictures from said telescope(s) to shut up the people who have limited faith in a government prone to genocide, rigged elections, lack of due process, and epic misdirections and subterfuge used to invade helpless and innocent countries, worldwide.

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
    3. Re:Fake statistics by cobbaut · · Score: 1

      Like all statistical data, this info is likely inflated and cannot be trusted.

      Fixed that for you.

      --
      European Linux user, living in Antwerp
  10. Re:...and not a fuck was given in the First World. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mm-hmm.

    Sure they may have 513 million Internet users, but how many of them are accessing the *full* internet that the rest of us are? With all their filters and the great firewall, it works more like a massive intranet.

  11. Re:...and not a fuck was given in the First World. by Baloroth · · Score: 2

    Still, the potential for access and communication is there. There are always ways around the filter. More people online is almost always a better thing. Filters or not, the Internet gives people access to more information and the ability to better educate themselves. This is a good thing: not as good as it could be, but still good.

    And to make money farming WoW gold, but that is a side "benefit", I guess.

    --
    "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
  12. Not Internet User, Content Consumers by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    This is nothing more than 500M people watching cable. The number of people who actually take an IP address and _produce_ anything with it is small. I'm not talking Web 2.0 lusers who use Chinified Facebook - I'm talking independent nodes on the global network.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  13. strength in numbers by ks9208661 · · Score: 2

    Now if they would just all ping the Great Firewall of China to death at the same time, they could make history in being the first to stage, and hopefully win, an e-revolution.

  14. Re:It's not even funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you had eyelids you would be laughing too.

               WANG COMPUTERS

    is also funny.  Back tot he eyelid thing.

  15. Blocked by soundguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since 75% of the malicious attacks on my networks originate in China, that's half a billion people who will continue to be blocked from my retail networks. Years ago, before I started blocking them, Chinese addresses were involved in a substantial percentage of the chargebacks I received. It will be decades before anyone I know would even consider taking them seriously as a source of legitimate customers.

    It would help a lot if they could manage to shut down all the illegal (and unpatched) copies of Microsoft's leaky piece-of-shit operating systems that they're running (as botnet nodes, more often than not) and replace them with Linux (they have their own distro from what I understand). Right now, Chinese visitors are about as welcome to US merchants as 10 Somalis in a speedboat are to a cargo ship off the coast of Africa.

    --
    Nothing worthwhile ever happens before noon
    1. Re:Blocked by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

      The problem isn't so much the OS, but rather the source of where the OS comes from. Finding a pirated copy of Windows (rooted with malware), are a dime a dozen only a walk aware from your nearest corner rickshaw. It's in the section right next to the pirated copies of movies and music. If Linux was just as popular, those local copies burned on CD would be rooted no doubt too.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Blocked by ElusiveJoe · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they could use their Great Firewall to cripple botnets. I mean, they have no problem finding and blocking thousands of IP addresses from TOR network, right? So they could easily block any number of C&C servers. But of course they wouldn't, because cyber attacks on other countries are controlled by the same government, which tries to mind-control citizens.

  16. Internet? by owlnation · · Score: 0

    I think the article must mean Intranet. I'd guess the Chinese Internet population is roughly about 1,000, and are all intelligence agents.

  17. If you are one in a million... by pcwhalen · · Score: 1

    ... you've got an audience of 500 exactly like you in China. Guaranteed.

    --
    Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain with all your metadata.
  18. Still waiting for FB users to hit 8 billion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still waiting for FaceBook users to hit 8 billion. The explanation will be great entertainment. At least the China figure is believable for now.

  19. Whenever China makes headlines in Slashdot ... by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... we get inundated by all sorts of racist diatribes

    And as if this is not enough, those racist diatribes got modded up "Funny" !

    Is this Slashdot all about, a site for racists to spew their totally incoherent diatribes ??

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Whenever China makes headlines in Slashdot ... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1, Funny

      its true.

      but you have to admit: each time you read a funny post, an hour later you want to read it again!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Whenever China makes headlines in Slashdot ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure the Chinese make a lot of fun of us and say very insulting things as well, but I'd be surprised if there are more than 0.001% of westerners here familiar enough with Chinese (and the Chinese internet) to be able to read it. And those that do probably have enough a sense of humor not to be bothered by such nonsense and don't give a shit. (I wouldn't be too surprised if most Chinese coming here are like that too. It's the PC crowd that's getting their pants up in a bunch. In which case most efforts only serve to feed the trolls.)

      Once you get past language, appearances, and some aspects of culture, usually I find that people are pretty much the same anywhere. They're not that much different in what they want in life. They only tend to really suck when it comes to issues of government, religion (or any dogma that imposes upon others), business/economics, or combinations thereof. And that goes for anybody.

      Still, if enough people of one group barge in on another with an obtuse or culturally incompatible manner and continue to act in certain ways despite being hit with a clue stick - it's hard not to earn their entire group a given repuation. Instead of crying about such derision (which is to be expected at that point), effort is better spent breaking that stereotype on an individual basis.

    3. Re:Whenever China makes headlines in Slashdot ... by sp3d2orbit · · Score: 1

      When Slashdot bags on China's government it is racist.

      When Slashdot bags on America's government it is +5 Insightful.

    4. Re:Whenever China makes headlines in Slashdot ... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      He's not saying that. He's saying that racism is racism, and racism is not cool.

    5. Re:Whenever China makes headlines in Slashdot ... by 0xG · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't consider myself a "racist". However I am somewhat of a "culturist".

      --
      A pox on web designers who feel that window.innerWidth == screen.availWidth
    6. Re:Whenever China makes headlines in Slashdot ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're forgetting something. The difference is that many of us here on Slashdot live in America, know what happens first-hand, and therefore actually know what we're talking about when we bag on America's government. With China, we're going solely off of preconception or based on what's presented to us in our media. That's racism.

      We self-criticize because we live here and care about what happens here. Fair enough! Criticizing some other nation thousands of miles away and making grossly exaggerated characterizations of how communism (or Chinese culture, or whatever boogeyman you can care to think of) makes them baby eaters and godless pagans when we've got enough problems to worry about at home is a waste of time, a waste of effort, and makes the rest of us look like a bunch of wankers.

  20. To the ignorants: by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    Never mind the IP addresses, I wondered if they were running out of Chinese names, and found this: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1554330/Too-many-Wangs-as-China-runs-out-of-names.html

    There are about 50,000 unique Chinese characters, and the Chinese names are made out of the combinations of those 50,000 unique Chinese characters

    On the other hand, the "West" as it is, has too many of its own "John Brown" / "Mary Smith"

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:To the ignorants: by timeOday · · Score: 1
      The funny thing is even SSNs are only 9 digits, and 1e9 is only 1 billion - not nearly enough for China's 1,338,299,500 inhabitants!

      I sure hope the US never has to add a digit.

    2. Re:To the ignorants: by KramberryKoncerto · · Score: 1

      The generic household Chinese dictionary would not have nearly as much as 50000 characters, and most people do not know more much than 5000. Some characters are also more popular than others. Parents won't usually use "death" and "sickness"; instead they would prefer "affluence" and "happiness". The actual pool of characters for naming is not that large.

  21. So what can I sell them by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    seriously 500mil potential customers? Items drop shipped from Chinese factories at dirt cheap prices?

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:So what can I sell them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely nothing. If you try the Chinese government will give a incredibly favorable loan to an Chinese company for them to undercut you and make sure you can't get a foot in the Chinese market. Then they will probably give them another loan for them to go into your home market and undercut you there too.

  22. Re:...and not a fuck was given in the First World. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you think you are not monitored? how naive!

  23. Wow by koan · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a gold mine for developers.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  24. How many of you know China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like the title.

  25. For Everybody Else There's IPv6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The USA were the first with TV, and ended up with NTSC. The world learned from our broadcast limitations and developed superior PAL. Now the USA is stuck with IPv4 while the rest of the world has moved forward with IPv6. The story repeats itself again and again with practically every technology. Priceless.

    1. Re:For Everybody Else There's IPv6 by unixisc · · Score: 1

      If that goes on, a time will come when the US will end up w/ all of the world's IPv4 addresses, while the rest of the world has moved to IPv6. And they'll still be arguing for NAT, even though IPv6 would have by then proven that it's not necessary.

  26. Someone from China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a CS student at a top university in China and regular slashdot reader and would like to share some thoughts of mine:
    While we don't know if the actual numbers are true, it's a fact that internet usage is rapidly expanding. I can see it everywhere in Beijing, people in their subways seem to get more and more addicted to their smart phones, iPads, iPhones,.. when eating alone a lot of people also use their mobile devices... heck even the old woman who sells water on our athletic fields recently got herself a Renren (chinese FB) account and writes articles over her mobile.

    It's definitely a good thing in my opinion, because scandals are more likely to be discovered and be raged about nationwide nowadays than before the internet age, and hopefully this makes politicians act more carefully. Some examples from around me:

    In China there is an extremely selective national college entrance examination where the sole criteria for which university you get in are the points you receive in the exam. Now influential politicians often try to "arrange" for their children to get a few additional points in order to make it in the top universities. Recently a quite comprehensive list was leaked that named these politicians and their children, with actually achieved scores and reported scores. Now privacy concerns aside (It's something that bugs me, but people here don't seem to care about it that much), this is terribly embarrassing for involved politicians and in the future they will definitely think twice before pulling strings with their influence.

    Another example were the Internet helped to make a difference for the better: A classmate from a friend of mine is from a very good high school, is a top student and really wants to go to Peking University. He is recommended for admission, meaning he doesn't have to take the exam, because he already worked so hard in high school and attended several national/ international olympiads. Now, however the school wants to force him to go to Tsinghua University, because they don't want to screw up their "guanxi" with Tsinghua. It is that f** up if you've worked your ass off in high school and then they don't even allow you a free decision, because of their own interests. So that said student wrote an article on Renren, and many many students in his high school saw and shared his article, creating a bigger and bigger wave of frustration and anger, until the school finally stopped their interference.

    Well altogether, while I admit that there are a lot of screwed up problems with the internet here (privacy concerns, filtering, propaganda, surveillance, and the list goes on...), I can feel that people really appreciate the internet and think that it has made life better, not worse. Furthermore, it's also such a big new market (I mean come on, more mobile users than the US population...lol ), so it'll also open up a lot of economic opportunities.

  27. Half billion?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy shit! That's a lot of Chinamen!!!

  28. Sorry for being nitpicky, but I think you meant... by pelayo · · Score: 1

    half thousand million users/half milliard, if you want.

  29. China, is several times the size of Wales by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

    Just so that you know that it is really, really large.

  30. Half a billion Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't be Wong.

    1. Re:Half a billion Chinese by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Can't be Wong.

      Yes they can:
      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1554330/Too-many-Wangs-as-China-runs-out-of-names.html

      Please direct all positive karma to PolygamousRanchKid, he found the link above.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  31. Re:That means half a billion... by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    ...Internet users are worthless human trash with no morals.

    Are you saying that the Internet users from China re "worthless human trash with no morals"?

    To the Slashdot editors, how long are you guys going to tolerate this type of racist garbage?

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  32. The Chinese consumer by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Makes you wonder if China really needs all those American IOUs.

    --
    Deleted
  33. Personal experience from epSos.de by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We can call it The Chinese Intra-net with unrealistic access to the real Internet.

    I run multiple, clean and friendly websites in the Chinese language which are accessible through baidu, the Chinese search engine, and Google. The Numbers of actual visitors who come trough the firewall of censorship is less than in smaller countries with comparable governments.

    The Chinese expats are much more on the Internet than the real people in China.

    The Chinese Internet market is not accessible from outside, until you are located in China and do everything to please the authorities to let your site through the filters which are obviously set on allow some and deny all the rest.

  34. haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does that say about the NY Times? We can get to the NY Times here in the US, but it's all crap propaganda as well.

  35. Re:That means half a billion... by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

    To be fair the mod system is already doing its thing and the OP was modded down into oblivion. In fact, for example, I wouldn't have even known the comment existed were it not for your post, and my browse threshold is lower than most visitors to the site are at.

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  36. Re:...and not a fuck was given in the First World. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China owns, literally, your "first world".