Slashdot Mirror


OpenStreetMap Reports Data Vandalism From Google-Owned IPs

An anonymous reader writes "Following reports of misconduct by Google employees in Kenya and India, It has been found that Google IP addresses have been responsible for deliberate vandalism of OpenStreetMap data. While it is unlikely that this was a deliberate or coordinated attack by Google HQ on the competition, multiple such reports does raise the question of whether or not Google has become too big to effectively enforce its 'Don't be evil' philosophy across its massive organization."

15 of 178 comments (clear)

  1. this, and then that other thing... by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's starting to sound like Google needs to reign in their over-eager foreign subsidiaries.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:this, and then that other thing... by jkflying · · Score: 5, Informative

      From a comment on the first linked page:

      Tom Hughes said...

      As the person who (in my role as an OpenStreetMap system administrator) first discovered this `incident' let me start by saying that I consider this post to be grossly irresponsible and wholly inappropriate.

      The board of OSMF are making mountains out of tiny pimples here. It seems that they want this to be some sort of organised corporate malfeasance on the part of Google which is why they have tried to link it to the recent Mocality incident where there was indeed clear evidence of such behaviour.

      The reality in this case is that there is no evidence that this is any different to the numerous other incidents we get all the time where users either accidentally or deliberately make bogus edits. The only difference in this case is that there happen to be two accounts (though we do not know if that is two people) and the user or users involved happen to (presumably) work for Google.

      That is the sum total of what we know, and on the back of that, and without approaching Google at all, two leading board members have decided to reveal personal information about two of our users.

      It seems to me that this is just an attempt to get some cheap publicity by trying to like the project to the Mocality incident, and I cannot support such behaviour. ...

      Only two of the seventeen accounts mentioned appear to have done anything identified as improper, and we have no idea how many of those accesses relate to those accounts or indeed to signed in vs not signed in users.

      Trying to read that as meaning that there have been 100,000 instances of vandalism is completely misleading.

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    2. Re:this, and then that other thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      One of the blog post authors is Steve Coast from Microsoft Bing Maps. Plus, the OSMF is claiming this post is a personal communication and does not represent the position of their board. So, the whole thing is starting to sound very suspicious.

    3. Re:this, and then that other thing... by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In other words it could have been.
      An honest mistake.
      Of course what really bugs me about all of this is that when people talke about the 3 strikes law I hear people say time and time again... IP addresses are not identity.
      IP addresses can be spoofed as can mac addresses.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:this, and then that other thing... by beelsebob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Note –Steve Coast founded OpenStreetMap.

    5. Re:this, and then that other thing... by msauve · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "IP addresses are not identity."

      Thank you. The hypocrisy around here is large, but not surprising.

      Does Google offer guest Wi-Fi access at any of their locations? Does anyone in Google run a Tor exit node? Are there any live jacks in Google meeting rooms? Do they NAT multiple internal addresses?

      It's one thing to confirm suspicions by setting up a honeypot phone number like Mocality did, and then receive calls from people identifying themselves as being from Google. It's quite another to only point to an IP addresses and place blame with no further evidence.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  2. Shocking by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 5, Funny

    Disconcerting. What next now, Norton producing viruses?

    --
    My first program:

    Hell Segmentation fault

    1. Re:Shocking by unity100 · · Score: 5, Funny

      norton is itself a virus since 1995-96.

  3. Cheap publicity stunt--admin who found evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    On the same blogpost,
    Tom Hughes said...
    As the person who (in my role as an OpenStreetMap system administrator) first discovered this `incident' let me start by saying that I consider this post to be grossly irresponsible and wholly inappropriate.
    The board of OSMF are making mountains out of tiny pimples here. It seems that they want this to be some sort of organised corporate malfeasance on the part of Google which is why they have tried to link it to the recent Mocality incident where there was indeed clear evidence of such behaviour.

    The reality in this case is that there is no evidence that this is any different to the numerous other incidents we get all the time where users either accidentally or deliberately make bogus edits. The only difference in this case is that there happen to be two accounts (though we do not know if that is two people) and the user or users involved happen to (presumably) work for Google.

    That is the sum total of what we know, and on the back of that, and without approaching Google at all, two leading board members have decided to reveal personal information about two of our users.

    It seems to me that this is just an attempt to get some cheap publicity by trying to like the project to the Mocality incident, and I cannot support such behaviour.

    1. Re:Cheap publicity stunt--admin who found evidence by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...without approaching Google at all...

      Good point. Fairness would be to first ask google for a position, maybe it was indeed just a rogue individual, or a mistake or whatever.

      but then comes the first question: how would one actually accomplish this feat, i.e. to "approach" google. Complaint addresses are exceedingly difficult to find, and those that are there don't seem to be manned. So it seems to me, the only solution does indeed be to skip the "let's discuss this first" step, and go directly to the press. Google, if you don't like this, then please become more "approachable", and people will approach you before badmouthing you in public.

  4. Does an IP identify or not? by Stewie241 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So... just for clarification, does an IP identify somebody? or not?

    I'm fairly certain that when I visited the GooglePlex they had a publically accessible WIFI connection. Do those count as Google owned IPs?

  5. Re:Evil by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Informative

    Disable adblock for a minute, and check it yourself. :)

    They don't have the regular adword ads. They do have business listings in the map. Most of the business listings show up if you search for something like "pizza near 10011".

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  6. Storm in a teacup by b0bby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As others have pointed out, this seems to be a storm in a teacup. If it leads to more participation in OSM, however, it'll be a good thing. I recently installed the Navfree android app (free onboard maps GPS, there's an IOS version too), and noticed a number of small inaccuracies in my neighborhood. Correcting them was really pretty easy; the maps around me already seem pretty usable, and with a bit more tweaking will be as good as any of the commercial alternatives. When I had first looked at it a couple of years ago the maps around me were pretty dire, so they've come a long way. House numbering seems to be the big remaining issue for navigation system use.

  7. Public WiFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Google has open public WiFi available on many of its offices that you can pick up from across the street. You can't easily tell machines on those networks from internal machines.

    Just pointing that out.

  8. Re:Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You have no opinion on it, yet you came into the thread to... what, check if the first comment was an anonymous attack on you so you could defend your good name? Come off it - you were clearly up for another anti-Google rant and are just acting affronted now that you've been caught out ahead of time. How is this kind of shilling not illegal?