Slashdot Mirror


Israel Faces Escalating Cyberwar

New submitter 9re9 writes "The NY Times describes what may be the beginning of an actual cyberwar between a pro-Palestinian group and Israeli companies, specifically El Al and the Tel Aviv stock exchange. From the article: 'A hacker identifying himself as oxOmar, already notorious for posting the details of more than 20,000 Israeli credit cards, sent an overnight warning to Israel's Ynet news outlet that a group of pro-Palestinian cyberattackers called Nightmare planned to bring down the sites in the morning.' Though the article is skimpy on technical details, the group appears to have engaged merely in a DDOS attack. Hamas praised the attack as opening 'a new resistance front against Israel.' Is this the first acknowledged cyberwar?"

20 of 200 comments (clear)

  1. "Cyberwar" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Cyberwar is a construct of politicians and government contractors to justify spending lots of money. War is war. This is not war.

    1. Re:"Cyberwar" by forkfail · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Disagree.

      If a nation-state or organized political entity orchestrates a campaign over time to destroy an enemies assets, be they economic, social or military, it's a war.

      Note that I don't include the war on drugs in that definition - that's just a massive black market. It would be a different matter if a foreign power was feeding us cheap drugs in order to put the nation into a stupor, but we're doing that ourselves.

      Nor do I include the War on Terror as a bonified war - in that case, it's too general, and it fails the first part of the definition ("organized political entity"). Now, you can have a war on al Quaeda, but not on terror in general.

      --
      Check your premises.
    2. Re:"Cyberwar" by chaboud · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure that 'bonified' could reasonably be taken to be the past participle of 'bonify', which has fallen out of use, but means, roughly, "to convert into good." So this guy either means 'bona fide' or he's making a far more subtle point than first inspection would indicate.

    3. Re:"Cyberwar" by Feyshtey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If your neighbor hacking into your computer, stealing your financial information and destroying your critical files, you're going to be as much or more impacted than if he's making his dog shit in your yard and spray painting your car. As a matter of scale the former is ultimately more harmful than the latter.

      If a foriegn entity is able to grind your nation's economy to a halt or eliminate communications or cripple your electrical infrastructure you are potentially more screwed than if there are some deaths through violence. And it can be done with relatively minor risk by a very small group.

      --
      "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,..." - Nancy Pelosi
    4. Re:"Cyberwar" by JumperCable · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Disagree.

      If a nation-state or organized political entity orchestrates a campaign over time to destroy an enemies assets, be they economic, social or military, it's a war.

      So when a nation or nations implements sanctions (for instance the sanctions on Iranian oil), you would consider that war? I think you definition of war is way to liberal.

      Also, if you disagree with me I will recognize that as an act of war on your part for trying to destroy my intellectual assets.

  2. So, how long until we see an attempt.... by forkfail · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... at security classification for programming, networking, system administration, etc.

    Or limits to who can take college classes. Or access web sites with that sort of information. Or own a non-registered compiler.

    I used to love the cyberpunk novels about the underground cowboy devs outsmarting the global security nets. Now that we may be heading towards that sort of thing in reality, this old dev isn't quite so enthralled by the scenario...

    --
    Check your premises.
  3. Lesser Evil by omganton · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd rather see cyber war between Palestine and Israel than real war. The can DDOS each other all day as long as it keeps them away from car bombs.

  4. Seriously by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Taking down someone's web page is a cyberwar now? When two countries (not companies vs script kiddies) start destroying actual (not virtual, potential or imagined) property within each other's borders and killing actual people, with the goal of conquering or annihilating each other, then maybe it'll be a cyberwar.

  5. Bet these kids will think they're smart... by benjfowler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    when they're getting blown literally to pieces with real weapons. Might school them in reality.

  6. Re:They've done quite a bit of attacking themselve by jd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, and to what effect? Iran's nuclear program has, by all estimates, been accelerating with every attack. Which is, frankly, no great surprise -- nuclear powers don't get messed with nearly as much as non-nuclear powers, so one should expect nations that consider themselves under threat to become nuclear powers as soon as possible. Whilst the Libyan situation is extremely complex, absolutely no dictator is going to go away with the message that they should reform - dictators don't think that way, even when they do think. Dictators will see that Libya has been attacked by foreign powers with the exception of one period - the time when Libya had weapons of mass destruction.

    Cyber warfare won't make any difference. Israel has made it clear in the press that it doesn't distinguish between targeted killings and targeted website attacks, which means we can expect to see people fall over from sudden lack of organic essentials like brains, a heart, etc. This will lead to physical reprisals and another spiral of attacks and revenge. Limited wars NEVER stay limited, again as demonstrated in Libya. It is the nature of warfare of any kind to escalate beyond the control of one or all parties involved.

    In the end, cyber warfare or physical warfare, there are no winners. You lose less badly than your opponent, that is all. Sun Tzu himself stated that the best strategy for warfare is to not be in one.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  7. Re:They've done quite a bit of attacking themselve by Tsingi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rest assured that Israel dishes it out at least as well as they get it. They're hardly innocent babes in the woods.

    I'd like to nominate that as the understatement of the year.

  8. Corrupt, don't bring down by Colin+Smith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fixing a non working system is easy.

    Corruption can't be fixed. If you want to cause real damage, you corrupt data, you don't delete it. Corruption, is very difficult to recover from, and the longer the corruption goes on unnoticed, the worse it is to recover.

    Taking down a system denies the use of the system as an asset. Corrupting the data or processes on the system makes that system work against it's owner. It becomes worse than useless.

    --
    Deleted
  9. If you're gonna threaten your neighbours... by msobkow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you're going to, as a nation, threaten your neighbours, arm yourself with nukes and the best military technology money can buy while oppressing and condemning a minority within your population (the Palestinians). If you're going to talk the talk about "peace" while continuing to invade and build on the occupied territories in dispute and supposedly under negotiation at peace talks. If you're going to take hundreds of millions in "Aid" dollars from someone your neighbours see as the "Great Oppressor".

    Well, if you do these things, don't be surprised if cyber terrorism is the least of your worries.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:If you're gonna threaten your neighbours... by msobkow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Flamebait" my ass. The truth hurts. Bend over and TAKE it.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  10. Re:They've done quite a bit of attacking themselve by Baloroth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What they get are children suicide bombers exploding themselves in crowded public spaces. Israel doesn't descend to that level, not even close. No, they are not innocent by any means, and I am not justifying what they do, just pointing out how hyperbolic your claims really are (which is, in a word, "very"). They have also been repeatedly attacked by nearly every one of their neighbors, and many of them have expressed a desire to wipe Israel from the face of the Earth. Again, just to put things into the proper perspective.

    --
    "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
  11. Re:They've done quite a bit of attacking themselve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What they get are children suicide bombers exploding themselves in crowded public spaces. Israel doesn't descend to that level, not even close...

    I wonder how hard you would have to come down on someone to make them think that blowing themselves up is a better choice than living. You'd have to make their lives a living hell, for sure. Probably have to take their land away from them, do all sorts of nasty stuff, and make sure that they just can't see any end to their suffering or the suffering of their children. If you take away their future, then I guess some people would chose to blow themselves up and take as many of the enemy with them as possible. Don't kid yourself, Israel has as much to do with creating suicide bombers as any country over there.

  12. Re:It could be if.... by SealBeater · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are you really saying that it's a weapons enrichment program, contrary to our own CIA and national security reports? Also keep in mind that civilian generation of nuclear power is within their rights under the IAEA?

    I mean, if you have some evidence, please produce it. Fear doesn't count.

    Also, at this point, with a foreign hostile nuclear power fighting wars of occupation on both sides of their country, I would want a nuke too.

    --
    -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
  13. innovate their way out by schlachter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As Israel has always done, and must always do, they will innovate their way out of the situation. Reducing the threat they face, while making a name for themselves in the cyber security market and profiting immensely.

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
  14. Re:They've done quite a bit of attacking themselve by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You'd have to make their lives a living hell, for sure. Probably have to take their land away from them, do all sorts of nasty stuff,

    lets see, for hundreds of years longer, we have been doing this to the native americans ('indians').

    when was the last time you saw an american indian suicide bomber, other than some caricature on tv? maybe an old western movie? but IRL? not really.

    through out history, people have conquored others and land has shifted ownership. why is this somehow different? and if you go back farther in time, that land certainly has had many owners. to whom do you give it, then?

    why stop there? so many other places in the world where X has taken Y. no matter what country you are from, in your history someone has taken someone's land or there is a dispute about its ownership in some way.

    I fail to see how 'palestinian' is any more special and why this argument applies to them and not every other people who fought and lost?

    israel fought many defensive battles, gained land and then gave it back. but that's still not enough, is it?

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  15. Re:It could be if.... by hjrnunes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Everyone knows what they (the Iranians) are doing. The Americans know it, the Europeans know it, the Russians know it and yes the Israelis know it too

    Yes we all see it. They're minding their own business. Which happens to be nuclear power. So, lets hear again why shouldn't Iran have nuclear power, military or otherwise?
    I'll anticipate the answer: "Why, because they are Islamic fundamentalists and raving lunatics and they'll use it to wipe Israel off the map!!!!111!!"

    Let's see, they are 1) Islamic fundamentalists - I don't see the problem, so is Saudi Arabia and the U.A.E. (and to a much worse degree), but they're considered good friends of the US. I wonder why... Anyway, Islamic fundamentalism has never got in the way of being on the good graces of the West. 2) They're raving lunatics - well I wish the whole world was raving lunatic like they are, given they haven't invaded any country in centuries. Don't see why that would suddenly change now. 3) They want to wipe Israel off the map - ahh, now we're getting somewhere aren't we. But, in fact, that is completely baseless and pretty much amounts to deception. What the president of Iran said, was that Israel should disappear from the maps. The 'we'll wipe it off the map' thing was a (deliberate) deceptive translation from Farsi by MEMRI which is a shill for Israeli interests and provides translations of Muslim media, carefully tailored to their master's objectives. It is, by no means, an unbiased news source. And even if it was, their translation is wrong.

    The question now is: Do you see what the US and Israeli elite are doing? Everyone knows. Anyone who cares to look can see this. They're leaving a pretty unmissable breadcrumb trail, and it passes through Afghanistan, Lebanon, Iraq and Pakistan. Except they're not using breadcrumbs. They're using cluster bombs.

    I don't know if you're American, but if you are, they're using your tax money for it while at the same time claiming they can't pay for your healthcare. Anyone can see this. For a lot of people indeed, it was the last thing they ever saw. Why can't you?