Slashdot Mirror


Hackers Steal $6.7M In Bank Cyber Heist

Orome1 writes "A perfectly planned and coordinated bank robbery was executed during the first three days of the new year in Johannesburg, and left the targeted South African Postbank — part of the nation's Post Office service — with a loss of some $6.7 million. The cyber gang behind the heist was obviously very well informed about the post office's IT systems, and began preparing the ground for the heist a few months before, by opening accounts in post offices across the country and compromising an employee computer in the Rustenburg Post Office."

91 comments

  1. Now let's see the reports of their capture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not whether you can get into a bank, or even out of it, it's how long you can keep the money.

    It will teach them to not have so many holidays I hope!

  2. Re:Organized trolling campaign on Slashdot by gweihir · · Score: 1

    And you expect credibility while posting as an AC and off-topic, why?

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  3. Re:Organized trolling campaign on Slashdot by TheCouchPotatoFamine · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Not sure if serious. he posted evidence, you just don't like it. Refute the claims.. oh wait you won't even post your name. great job.

    --
    CS majors know the time/space tradeoff, but they never get taught the 3rd, crucial, tradeoff of the set: comprehension!
  4. "compromising an employee computer" by omganton · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Hey, can I check my Facebook real quick?"

  5. Re:Organized trolling campaign on Slashdot by alphatel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    He only expects further trolling, which has been granted.

    --
    When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
  6. Surprised it took so long for somebody to do this by gweihir · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was part of a small team that described a pretty similar attack scenario to a customer almost 10 years back. It is no surprise at all that this worked and it would work in a lot of other places as well. The only really tricky part is coordinating the mules (and keeping them quiet) as you do not know how much money is available at each specific ATM. But you can guess by observing usage patterns (counting customers) and how often they are re-stocked.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  7. GOD DAMN RUSKIES !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Time to just nuke 'em all and be rid of the devil dogs once and for all !!

    1. Re:GOD DAMN RUSKIES !! by tomhath · · Score: 2

      Not to be pedantic, but "devil dogs" is a nickname for the United States Marines.

  8. Summary is wrong by Smallpond · · Score: 4, Informative

    42m Rand is not 6.7m USD, it is more like 5.2m.

    1. Re:Summary is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now just 4.3m, ... 5 minutes later
      2.1m, ...
      0.1m ...
      now you are better off burning it for heat than trying to pay your bills with it ;)

    2. Re:Summary is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      wrong African country.

    3. Re:Summary is wrong by powerlinekid · · Score: 1

      The $ sign in front of the 6.

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    4. Re:Summary is wrong by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Where's my Mod points? That's seriously funny.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    5. Re:Summary is wrong by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 2

      Many countries use the $ sign you insensitive clod.

    6. Re:Summary is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I hope thats a joke, otherwise your US-centric view is atrocious.

    7. Re:Summary is wrong by Formalin · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's Zimbabwe. SA, while experiencing considerable inflation in the 90's, is reasonably stable now, and no where near the level of inflation in zimbabwe.

      1 rand used to be worth around 1 USD, IIRC (apartheid era). inflation went up with political change, and by around 2000? it was 10 or so to a dollar, and is something like 6-7 these days. So 50-100% some years, less overall, which is bad... but not hyperinflation, where prices double in days or hours, instead of years (like in zimbabwe).

    8. Re:Summary is wrong by Everything+Else+Was · · Score: 1

      But it is about 6.7m Brunei dollars, or New Zealand dollars... or Singapore dollars.

      --
      My other account has mod points!
    9. Re:Summary is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      and is something like 6-7 these days

      1 U.S. dollar = 8.03322542 South African rands

      42 million South African rands = 5.228286 million U.S. dollars

      Good thing we're not on the internet, or it would look a little stupid to be making up numbers when there are perfectly good sources available.

    10. Re:Summary is wrong by borrrden · · Score: 1

      Good point! It actually works out to nearly exactly 6.7 million Singapore dollars

    11. Re:Summary is wrong by ciderbrew · · Score: 1

      Well in the UK I'd rather have dollars. I'm sick of seeing a price for something on the net in the US and it costs $300 and when you look at the UK site and it costs £300 (or more). I'm happy to swap signs over as and when needed.

    12. Re:Summary is wrong by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      42m Rand is not 6.7m USD, it is more like 5.2m.

      And no doubt falling like a stone on this news.

    13. Re:Summary is wrong by treeves · · Score: 1

      Many programmers (and Excel users!) use the $ sign you insensitive clod.

      FTFY.

      Seriously though, for currency, other than USD?
        Not if they want people to know what the hell they're talking about.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    14. Re:Summary is wrong by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      It is my understanding that Zimbabwe's currency has settled down to a value of 0. They use US$ now. Yes, they are printing them too.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    15. Re:Summary is wrong by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Informative

      Seriously though, for currency, other than USD?
          Not if they want people to know what the hell they're talking about.

      Have you ever been outside of the US? Or are you just talking out of your ass?

      In Canada we have a dollar ... the symbol is the standard '$' used by most places that have currency they call dollars. There is no other symbol on the keyboard, the way you differentiate is something like "$100 CDN" -- and within Canada, we don't even do that.

      If it wasn't SOPA protest blackout day, you could read a list of places, but this will pretty much show you what is used. Almost 30 countries besides the US express their currency with the $ sign.

      I'm afraid if you're claiming that only the US dollar is described using the $ sign you're completely mistaken ... because it's a pretty widespread symbol.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    16. Re:Summary is wrong by powerlinekid · · Score: 1

      Contextually speaking how many of those other currencies would realistically be the intent of the $ in front of this figure? I am aware other countries use the $ symbol however it is completely pointless to create an article where you convert the South Africa currency to Canadian. It is very obvious, even to the worst pedantic, that they were talking USD.

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    17. Re:Summary is wrong by powerlinekid · · Score: 1

      Sorry but nobody outside of Canada is going to convert the currency of South Africa to the currency of Canada to clarify the amount of money stolen. It is quite obvious that the use of $ meant USD, just like it does 95% of the time on the internet. If you want to have hurt feelings, go right on ahead.

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    18. Re:Summary is wrong by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      It is quite obvious that the use of $ meant USD, just like it does 95% of the time on the internet. If you want to have hurt feelings, go right on ahead.

      The poster asserted that nobody ever uses the $ sign to represent anything but US dollars, which is clearly false. All I'm saying.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    19. Re:Summary is wrong by treeves · · Score: 1

      If you're referring to me, that's not what I said.
      I said if they want others to know what they mean, they don't.
      (e.g. if they post "$6.00" on Slashdot, a US-based website, and expect readers to understand they mean $6 CDN, they are foolish).
      And yes, I've been outside the US: UK, Hong Kong, Africa, Japan... and yes, even Canada.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    20. Re:Summary is wrong by acooks · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Zimbabwe would print USD if it could, but I doubt that it can.

        "...according to diplomats here, a German company, Giesecke and Devrient GmbH, prints about half of the government's currency and also supplies all of its banknote paper." - http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2008/07/01/where-the-money-isn-t.html

    21. Re:Summary is wrong by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I understand they aren't very good copies. The good copies are from N. Korea and Iran.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  9. That's nothing by midtowng · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wall Street CEO's have been stealing much larger amounts from their own banks for years.

    1. Re:That's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pics or it didn't happen

  10. How possible is it that it was an inside job? by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    How could an investigation rule out a possible inside job? These hackers are pretty good at covering their tracks.

    One of the many clever ways they employed in one heist, was to run malicious code that incapacitated random parts of the system once it detected that it was itself under some kind of detection or surveillance. Clever indeed.

    1. Re:How possible is it that it was an inside job? by nothajan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How could an investigation rule out a possible inside job?

      In Soviet Russia, inside job rules out possible investigation.

  11. Re:Organized trolling campaign on Slashdot??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are we really supposed to believe that? Specially when you seem to have waited right there till the news item to come out to post this accusation?
    Seriously? A first post with the exact time stamp as the news item, it undoubtedly seems that:
    - you don't have anything else to do;
    - hanging around on /. is your job description.

    (posting as AC to avoid harassment)

  12. Re:Organized trolling campaign on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think all of you need to settle it after 3 like school children are supposed to. I'm tired of all you idiots.

  13. Re:Organized trolling campaign on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does any of it really matter? Those mod points are, in the end, worthless. Work your e-peen elsewhere that makes it look like you matter, like a aol chatroom.

  14. Re:Organized trolling campaign on Slashdot by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

    Go away, DCTech. Eat your down mods like the office drone that you are.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
  15. Re:Surprised it took so long for somebody to do th by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm much more surprised by the fact that they managed to take about 1% of the entire assets of the wanna-be bank. That's pretty disturbing - because that means that nothing was working right. Not their security, not their required privileges, not their fraud detection, nothing. Note to self: don't do business in SA.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
  16. Conspiracies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I love conspiracies. I can't wait until the twist where Bonch and GreatBunzinni turn out to be the same person

  17. FTFY by drainbramage · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Politicians have been stealing much larger amounts for years.

    --
    No brain, no pain.
    1. Re:FTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They're in it together, in case you haven't noticed.

  18. Re:Organized trolling campaign on Slashdot by TheCouchPotatoFamine · · Score: 1, Insightful

    he clearly showed that Bonch and Overly Critical Guy had posts which were themes on the same base material. Certainly, a professional advertiser would use such a permutation. That's evidence enough for the court of slashdot... the burden of proof is yours, AC.

    --
    CS majors know the time/space tradeoff, but they never get taught the 3rd, crucial, tradeoff of the set: comprehension!
  19. And terrorists thank you for running windows by WindBourne · · Score: 0, Redundant

    When will idiots understand that windows is the best friends of terrorist and criminals? So many claim that it is cheap to run, but they NEVER take into account things like this. WHy? Because the costs are externalized. Insurance companies need to get a clue and start jacking up their prices for companies that run insecure systems like Windows.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:And terrorists thank you for running windows by KhabaLox · · Score: 1

      I only skimmed the article, but didn't see a reference to OS. How do you know what their architecture is?

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    2. Re:And terrorists thank you for running windows by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Informative
      http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://www.postbank.co.za
      And to back it up

      ....$telnet www.postbank.co.za 80
      Trying 165.8.13.24...
      Connected to www.postbank.co.za.
      Escape character is '^]'.
      GET / HTTP/1.0

      HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
      Content-Length: 1635
      Content-Type: text/html
      Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0
      X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
      Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 03:35:38 GMT
      Connection: close


      The page cannot be found
      ....

      Anybody running windows on their website is highly likely running it inside.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:And terrorists thank you for running windows by GillyGuthrie · · Score: 2

      Wow, I wish I had mod points so I could mod parent "Flamebait."

      When will idiots understand that windows is the best friends of terrorist and criminals?

      With an opening statement like that, all the following dialogue is rendered irrelevant.

    4. Re:And terrorists thank you for running windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes, I see, do go on. And for how long have you been labouring under the delusion that you know anything remotely connected to enterprise computing?

      Do yourself a favour - don't give up your day job, unless it's something like computer forensics, or anything to do with computers at all, really, in which case change your career quickly before whoever hired you figures out their mistake.

    5. Re:And terrorists thank you for running windows by zoloto · · Score: 2

      I do this with my web servers. Make them report as if they were IIS while it's really apache or lighttpd.

    6. Re:And terrorists thank you for running windows by kiwimate · · Score: 1

      Anybody running windows on their website is highly likely running it inside.

      If you're saying they're likely running it inside in some capacity, agreed. If you're arguing that running your public website on IIS automatically implies you're running all your core business processes on Windows, that's a heck of a stretch. I've never come across a business that's entirely homogeneous.

    7. Re:And terrorists thank you for running windows by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2

      I do this with my web servers. Make them report as if they were IIS while it's really apache or lighttpd.

      I do this too... and then check my logs for attempted exploits which I can use against real IIS and ASP sites...

    8. Re:And terrorists thank you for running windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't mess with Microcrap winders here or you will be modded down here. Welcome to the new slashdork, with idle and all...

      And of course TFA doesn't mention any OS names as it is of course completely irrelevant... or is it?

    9. Re:And terrorists thank you for running windows by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Yes, some companies like walmart do this. but how many do this? Few. Very few. I would be shocked if it was 2% of all reporting as IIS were faked.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    10. Re:And terrorists thank you for running windows by WindBourne · · Score: 2

      I agree that running windows on IIS does not mean that all of their inside processes are on windows. However, as a contractor, I have seen that if a company runs non-windows on their front-end, than their back end is most likely close to 100% non-windows with the possible exception of desktops. But even those will be locked down fairly tightly.

      But, when companies run IIS on the front-end, then their process servers will very likely be heavily into windows. Their DB may actually be oracle on sun, mainframe, or something else. However, what is important, are the desktops or process servers since they are normally the cracked items.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  20. Why not just "bank robbers"? by Alimony+Pakhdan · · Score: 2

    I could understand the mass media using the word "hackers" here but /. should know better. These guys are just bank robbers and we dont differentiate between bank robbers who use handguns vs those with knives vs those who claim to have a bomb strapped to them.

    1. Re:Why not just "bank robbers"? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      I could understand the mass media using the word "hackers" here but /. should know better. These guys are just bank robbers and we dont differentiate between bank robbers who use handguns vs those with knives vs those who claim to have a bomb strapped to them.

      Sure we do: "masked gunmen held up", "'pizza bomber' bank robber", "mad bomber bank robbery", and bank robbers who use knives are called stupid unless they have a whole gang.

  21. money mules had no problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "stopping completely when the offices were opened again on January 3" ...and returning to their jobs at the post

  22. Not the first time in SA by Dan+B. · · Score: 1

    This isn't the first "cyber heist" in South Africa, just the first one to make the news.

    Seriously, though, criminals realised long ago that you can steal more electronically than you can carry in a 'traditional' heist. Just look at the Russian's and their level of organised e-crime!

    --
    Dan. -- So what if it's spelt wrong, nobody's perfect
    1. Re:Not the first time in SA by Magada · · Score: 1

      Stand by for the outlawing of cash. Any fraudulent cash transactions could then be reversed at will. Moving product stolen with funnymoney is much harder

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
  23. Dear Mr. South African Postbank Postmaster General by slas6654 · · Score: 5, Funny

    My very wealthy American uncle, who was the American consulate attache to Guyana, recently passed away. While we are very sad for his passing, he has left a great fortune in the Bank of Amerika that, unfortunately, cannot be transferred back to Guyana without completing the probate process. Since my wealthy American Uncle (Sam was his name) was too big to fail (er I mean die), I stand to inherit a great deal of wealth. I will gladly share with you this windfall at the Bank of Guyana if you will help me complete the probate. If you will kindly Paypal 52m Rand to help defray the cost of the probate, I will in turn send you 52billion US dollars. Please respond in confidence to my email address: Angelo.Mozilo@Countrywide.com.

  24. Fall Guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The investigation will hopefully reveal whether the backdoor into the compromised computer was installed by the employee unwittingly or whether the employee was recruited by the gang to allow them access." I would not want to be that employee!

  25. Re:Organized trolling campaign on Slashdot by metrix007 · · Score: 0

    So fucking retarded. They both made points obvious to anyone holding that view. That fact that they hold the same view at an abstract level is not evidence that they are the same person or a shill. Unless most accounts on here are shills for Linus. Yeah, that works.

    --
    If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
  26. Re:Organized trolling campaign on Slashdot by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 3, Funny
    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  27. honestly, this has probably happened in the USA by decora · · Score: 4, Interesting

    im guessing that the main reason it seems like an 'unusual south africa thing' is because US banks never, ever talk about this kind of thing.

    partly out of embarassment, partly because the entire system is based on 'security through obscurity'.

    ----

    of course, oblig. comment about how thousands of US banks failed in 2008/9/10 due to the CDO fraud system - which directly involved and benefited the ratings agencies. but its almost like nobody cares about that. they care about 5 million stolen from ATMs, but not about 2 trillion stolen from the taxpayers.

    1. Re:honestly, this has probably happened in the USA by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      Nearly every attack, most likely including this one, was an inside job.

      Besides, every bank in the world that isn't American invests ridiculous amounts into security (and fails). American banks, well, they also fail. But American banks are pretty unique in that they will only invest a reasonable amount to prevent fraud going out of control. They will actually not go after every single instance of fraud.

      Of course, one of the big screwups exploited this exact "weakness".

  28. "Hi, this is Jo from I.T...." by jampola · · Score: 1

    This sounds like more of a case of social engineering rather than hacking.

    I am pretty sure their Systems Analysts and Programmers will cop most of the shit that is coming for what I predict is some stupid emplyees fault. "Yes, what can I do for you Jo?"

    I could be wrong, but that's my take.

  29. ...sigh... and they worked SO hard on the book. by Shadowruni · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Read "Stealing the Network: How to own a Continent"

    The whole book is this heist.

    Literally.

    Just check out the summary.

    The thing that makes this book series special is that they don't say, "I ran nmap and knew from the output they were running a webserver."

    They say "I ran nmap with 'sudo nmap -P0 -T3 -p 80 127.0.0.1 -oA localscan'

    And got:

    Starting Nmap 5.21 ( http://nmap.org/ ) at 2012-01-17 20:55 PST Nmap scan report for localhost (127.0.0.1) Host is up (0.000083s latency). PORT STATE SERVICE 80/tcp open http Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.07 seconds And could see from the line "80/tcp open http"

    http://www.amazon.com/Stealing-Network-How-Own-Continent/dp/1931836051

    //Has the whole series and still remembers the props I got from Blue bore.

    ///Yes I know the example is a bit contrived but that is exactly how they present information in the series and I learned a lot from it.

    --
    "Chinese Amazons, power armor, laser swords.... things just meant to be." - Shampoo, A Very Scary Bet
  30. Re:Surprised it took so long for somebody to do th by nroets · · Score: 0

    ... they managed to [loose] about 1% of the entire assets of the wanna-be bank.... Note to self: don't do business in SA.

    The correct conclusion is that incompetent governments should not be involved in banking.

  31. Re:Surprised it took so long for somebody to do th by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2

    The correct conclusion is that incompetent governments should not be involved in banking.

    But incompetent corporations should?

  32. Apparently they are also operating a CA by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2
    From the second link:

    Asked if there were concerns about the risk the security breach posed to government departments using the Trust Centre hosted by the post office...

    If that's what I think it is, look forward to another wave of MITM-facilitating rogue certificates, this time from South Africa...

    , Pule said: "The centre has high security parameters to protect all the services delivered through it."

    oh, after that much buzz-word laden alphabet soup, I feel so much better. Hopefully their flux capacitors are fully charged or else there high security parameters might unload.

    1. Re:Apparently they are also operating a CA by psydeshow · · Score: 1

      From the second link:

      , Pule said: "The centre has high security parameters to protect all the services delivered through it."

      They were originally considering the low and medium security parameters as well. Unfortunately, the chairman of the board demanded only the highest security, so they only implemented that. Such a shame, because now the low and medium parameters are completely unsecured.

  33. Re:Surprised it took so long for somebody to do th by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2

    I'm much more surprised by the fact that they managed to take about 1% of the entire assets of the wanna-be bank.

    At least, that means that their ATMs were well-stocked for the long New Years' break. Around here they'd have run out of money on the second day...

  34. Alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least the criminals are not blowing up ATM's (while people are there) or money vans (on busy highway), and not rushing into a local supermarket armed with AK-47's - as is the case often across johannesburg, where I live :-)

  35. ATM bombings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIizDImrzHI Video of ATM bombings which is also epidemic in South Africa.

  36. This is not a mundane detail Michael! by antifoidulus · · Score: 2

    Are they sure it wasn't just a penny rounding scheme gone terribly awry?

    1. Re:This is not a mundane detail Michael! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must have put a decimal point in the wrong place or something.

  37. No problem.. by 3seas · · Score: 1

    Since Money is just an abstract representation of value that only works as well as the agreed use by those using it, so to ease trade (vs. barter) and in this case its wasn't even paper or coin, they can type the numbers back into the system, like it was never gone. And this would be far from the first or last time the banksters do this.

    This idea that to much of this abstract tool in circulation leads to inflation is bull shit, just and excuse of the banksters to play their game of manipulating the economies. Take enough money out of circulation and things crash (as would a car lacking oil) and here is where the banksters then buy properties and other real value up at pennies on the dollar. Then they put money back into circulation and build public confidence to the point of high consumer spending..... Rinse and repeat.

    And now you know the game being played by the few at the top of the banksters criminal organization.

  38. Oceans 14? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 2

    Is this the one where George sets up a house to be tilted, no wait, that was the second?
    Oh yeah, ok, they rent a whole bunch of small mini coopers and.....nope...
    Ok, I got it....she has to go under all the infrareds and slowly stealth her way through to the .....

    Ok, nevermind, I think I am overloaded as it is...movin on....nothin I want to see here.

  39. Hi Bonch / Overly Critical Guy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This "shill" crap that has been flying around lately has to stop.

    such as Galestar, NicknameOne, and flurp

    Oh, please. It is obvious that this crapflood is from bonch (== Overly Critical Guy) who has a problem with Galestar, NicknameOne, flurp, and GreatBunzinni.

    bonch: The "shill" accusations flying around on Slashdot lately are getting out of control.
    Overly Critical Guy: This isn't bonch... Aren't you Galestar/NicknameOne/flurp who replies to all his posts?

    Overly Critical Guy: Hi, GreatBunzinni. How do I know it's you? ... This is not bonch.... Signed, NOT bonch

    "This isn't bonch"? Ha ha. BUSTED!

    bonch: Seamless experiences win out in the long term. We saw this when gaming moved from PCs to consoles in the 2000s, and it's happening now in the transition to the post-PC era.
    Overly Critical Guy: Seamless experiences always win out over time. We saw it when gaming shifted from PCs to consoles, and now the industry is shifting from desktops to mobile devices.

    Overly Critical Guy Android phones used to look like this
    bonch: Android used to look like this

    Overly Critical Guy: The keyboard looks exactly like Apple's flat keyboard, and the trackpad is the Magic Trackpad that Apple started offering a year or so ago
    bonch: The keyboard looks just like Apple's flat keyboard introduced a few years ago, the trackpad is a clone of the Apple Trackpad.

    bonch: A Slashdot employee recently told me that my comments generate more moderations than any he's ever seen. (yes, that is what happens when you mod your own troll posts up from multiple accounts.)

  40. Re:Surprised it took so long for somebody to do th by b0bby · · Score: 3, Informative
  41. Re:Organized trolling campaign on Slashdot by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    They're both Apple fanboys, apart from that they have nothing in common. Bonch is one of the bloggers on MacJournal.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  42. Re:Surprised it took so long for somebody to do th by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

    But incompetent corporations should?

    I think you meant: But incompetent corporations are?

    Also, not sure about off-shore but in the states the government is not involved in the banks which are private entities for the most part, no idea about SA, but it doesn't seem so? lol