Slashdot Mirror


US Supreme Court Upholds Removal of Works From Public Domain

langelgjm writes "While much of the web is focused on the SOPA and PIPA blackout, supporters of the public domain today quietly lost a protracted struggle that began back in 2001. The Supreme Court, in a 6-2 decision, rejected the argument that Congress did not have the power to convey copyright upon works that were already in the public domain. The suit was originally filed to challenge provisions that the U.S. adopted when signing the TRIPs agreement. Justices Breyer and Alito dissented, arguing that conveyed copyright on already existing works defied the logic of copyright law. Justice Kagan recused herself. The text of the opinions is available here (PDF)."

2 of 380 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Bush Nominees by forkfail · · Score: 5, Informative

    Chief Justice Roberts was appointed by Bush. So, one of the Bush appointees - the Chief Justice - went for the ruling.

    Alito was also appointed by Bush - so you're right there.

    Breyer was appointed by Clinton.

    So - yeah. I see the BushCo folks haven't gotten any better grasp of facts since Bush was in office.

    But I'm sure you'll find your reality basis soon. It's probably north, south, east, west of here...

    --
    Check your premises.
  2. Re:Is there nothing... by FairAndHateful · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't worry, they'll force their laws on your country, too with 'free trade' agreements and treaties..

    The article indicates that this law/judgement was to comply with an international treaty. Something about works that were in the public domain in the US that were still copyrighted in other countries. Looks like this came to the US from the other side this time. Doesn't make it make a lot of sense.