Slashdot Mirror


DOJ Investigates Google, Apple, and Others For 'No Poaching' Agreement

CSHARP123 writes "The Department of Justice launched an investigation into the 'No Poaching' agreement between Apple and Google in 2010, but details of the case were only made public for the first time yesterday. TechCrunch was the first to sift through the documents, and has uncovered some ostensibly incriminating evidence against not only Google and Apple, but Pixar, Lucasfilm, Adobe, Intel, and Intuit, as well. According to the filings from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in San Jose, these companies did indeed enter 'no poach' agreements with each other, and agreed to refrain from soliciting employees. The documents also indicate they collectively sought to limit their employees' power to negotiate for higher salaries."

3 of 360 comments (clear)

  1. Re:This is why we don't need regulation by Motard · · Score: 5, Informative

    This represents a non-free job market. That's the problem and why it's apprpriate for government to step in.

    No one is arguing for no regulation. But there is such a thing as over regulation.

  2. Re:This is why we don't need regulation by msauve · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the article: "The evidence states that the defendants agreed not to poach employees from each other or give them offers if they voluntarily applied, and to notify the current employers of any employees trying to switch been."

    Where did you come up with your claim to the contrary?

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  3. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I can't resist submitting these Adam Smith (the idol of free market advocates) lines copied from Wikipedia:

    "We rarely hear, it has been said, of the combinations of masters, though frequently of those of workmen. But whoever imagines, upon this account, that masters rarely combine, is as ignorant of the world as of the subject. Masters are always and everywhere in a sort of tacit, but constant and uniform, combination, not to raise the wages of labour above their actual rate [...] Masters, too, sometimes enter into particular combinations to sink the wages of labour even below this rate. These are always conducted with the utmost silence and secrecy till the moment of execution; and when the workmen yield, as they sometimes do without resistance, though severely felt by them, they are never heard of by other people". In contrast, when workers combine, "the masters [...] never cease to call aloud for the assistance of the civil magistrate, and the rigorous execution of those laws which have been enacted with so much severity against the combination of servants, labourers, and journeymen."

    Smith, of source, said it much better than the clowns who opine here.