Slashdot Mirror


International Organization To Assess Earth Defense From Space Dangers

arisvega writes in with a story about an international organization that is trying to come up with options to save the planet from a large asteroid or comet collision. "NEOShield is a new international project that will assess the threat posed by Near Earth Objects (NEO) and look at the best possible solutions for dealing with a big asteroid or comet on a collision (PDF) path with our planet. The effort is being led from the German space agency's (DLR) Institute of Planetary Research in Berlin, and had its kick-off meeting this week. It will draw on expertise from across Europe, Russia and the US. It's a major EU-funded initiative that will pull together all the latest science, initiate a fair few laboratory experiments and new modelling work, and then try to come to some definitive positions. Industrial partners, which include the German, British and French divisions of the big Astrium space company, will consider the engineering architecture required to deflect one of these bodies out of our path."

8 of 93 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Armageddon! by loustic · · Score: 5, Funny

    We just need one more *orginization* to save us from typos and humanity is saved ...

  2. NEOShield? That's all they could come up with? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seriously. Fiction is ripe with way better names than that. Next time just swipe one! I'd feel much safer in the hands of the Earth Defense Force.

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  3. Re:Spelling by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Orginization" (in the headline) should be spelled "Organization"

    That's nothing. Look how they misspelled "Space Dragons".

  4. Looking at the problem backwards. by wbr1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They are looking at the issue from the wrong direction. We should not work for ways to destroy or deflect an asteroid. There are many other things that can cause catastrophic loss of life on this planet, from 'mega-volcanoes', nuclear war, epidemic diseases, and yes even -gasp- climate change.

    Instead of moving the danger of our path, we should be moving ourselves off the path of danger. We need an off site backup for humanity at least, if not as much of the biosphere as we could manage. Eventually, something WILL destroy 99.9% of life on Earth. It has happened before and will again, whether 10 years or 10,000 years from now.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:Looking at the problem backwards. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      You realize, of course, that important backups never work when you need them.

      We're doomed.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  5. Re:Armageddon! by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yep. And, early detection is most important. Waiting til the damned huge ass rock is a month away ensures that our best efforts will be worth shit. If we can get a team on the rock a year before impact, even a tiny deflection in it's course will work to avert disaster.

    Of course, a nuke isn't necessary, if you get on the rock early enough. A few tons of thrust from a chemical rocket would be good enough. Or, a chemical bomb dropped down the well that you've drilled. Nukes are sexy, but not essential.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  6. Currently Proposed Defense System by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 4, Funny

    The are presently reviewing a Space Defense System that consists of a miles long series of defensive shields protecting a rail-mounted missile platform with gaps between the shields creating launch apertures. The missile platform can be operated remotely, much in the same way as current UAV drones. However, there is no missile guidance control and the display is very pixelated with only 1-bit color depth. if you ask me, they'll need to vastly improve the graphics if they want to see this proposal get accepted.

  7. Re:Armageddon! by SlippyToad · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think the nuke idea came from Edward Teller, who was basically a pyromaniac given a government grant.

    He was just jazzed to blow up things, and applying gigantic nuclear explosions to meteorites would have given him jack-off material for the rest of his life.

    Of course I think he's dead now, so we can do something that a sane person would.

    --
    One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on