Slashdot Mirror


The Google+ Name Game Continues

theodp writes "'Sticks and stones will break my bones,' the old nursery rhyme goes, 'but names will never hurt me.' Unless, of course, you're on Google+. While touting what it calls a move toward a more inclusive naming policy for Google+, the search giant's Name Policy would still make Sister Aloysius Beauvier smile. Names like 'Doctor Stan Livingston,' 'Bill Smithwick DDS,' and 'Rev. Jim Copley, S. P.' are cited as examples of violations that could cost you your Google+ privileges. And since new Google account users are reportedly now forced to join Google+, one wonders if the Name Policy might even preclude one from establishing one of those adorable dear.sophie.lee or dear.hollie accounts."

3 of 171 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Google Inflating User Amount by snotclot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Alright, well who cares? If Google shoots itself in the butt by destroying / tying in social with its search, a new search contender will most likely step up and fill the 2nd place void. Maybe it'll be Bing.

    Just let the market correct itself.

  2. Re:Google Inflating User Amount by elashish14 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just let the market correct itself.

    No.

    No.

    No.

    I'm sick of hearing this idiotic philosophy. The market does not correct itself. If 1% of your faith in 'the market' were of any merit, then people would have been leaving Facebook in droves due to all the privacy gaffes they've had. Let's face it - people are stupid, nobody cares about their own privacy, and living by some stupid appeal to the majority will only make that the de facto standard.

    Why is this a problem? Because if everyone uses Facebook/G+/whatever, then everybody else has to start abiding by their idiotic terms, because eventually, all the employers/social groups/universities/etc. start using these abusive services too and make it so that you have no choice. Some groups choose to conduct all their business on Facebook - to me, they might as well not exist as nothing will ever make me sign up for that piece of shit. So don't talk about letting the market correct itself - the market is pretty much always wrong, and it has terrible consequences.

    --
    I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
  3. Re:Google Inflating User Amount by Asic+Eng · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even if the market did work, it would do so by:

    • 1 - people being annoyed about something
    • 2 - people discussing their complaints, making others aware of the problem
    • 3 - people deciding to switch to an alternative in significant numbers

    Telling people not to complain as the market will take care of it, basically advocates skipping the step which would make the market take care of it. It really makes no sense.