Slashdot Mirror


Psychics Say Apollo 16 Astronauts Found Alien Ship

astroengine writes "A group called Transception Incorporated, self-described as an Austin, Texas-based psychic R&D operation, sent a letter (PDF) to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden that nominates the Apollo 16 crew for the Congressional Space Medal of Honor. Why? Well, a variety of 'shipwreck elements' on the Moon — described as 'structures, people/aliens, biological technology, and their plight' — were reportedly 'seen' through remote viewing (PDF) by six experts at Transception. These 'elements' can be seen, along with Apollo 16 moonwalkers John Young and Charles Duke, in photographs during that famous mission, obviously making this the first ever alien encounter."

63 of 285 comments (clear)

  1. Young and Duke respond "Nope, no anal probing" by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "We're not sure what these psychics are talking about, but we sure didn't encounter any aliens, nor were we in any way anally-probed. And we certainly weren't anally-probed repeatedly. Just never happened. We enjoyed a normal mission with no butt-raping from aliens at all...just two astronauts doing their job and *not* being tied down and repeatedly probed."

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Young and Duke respond "Nope, no anal probing" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And we certainly weren't anally-probed repeatedly. Just never happened. We enjoyed a normal missionary position

      FTFY

    2. Re:Young and Duke respond "Nope, no anal probing" by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 4, Funny

      "We're not sure what these psychics are talking about, but we sure didn't encounter any aliens, nor were we in any way anally-probed. And we certainly weren't anally-probed $^&$!@... I love to sing-a; About the moon-a and the June-a and the spring-a; I love to sing-a; About a sky of blue-a, or a tea for two-a,

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    3. Re:Young and Duke respond "Nope, no anal probing" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not as funny as you thought it was

    4. Re:Young and Duke respond "Nope, no anal probing" by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well I personally think its funny that most likely to this very day the US government is working under a 'war of the worlds' rule that says if little green men parked on the White house lawn to get some pics with the Obama cutout they'd be going "aliens? what aliens? didn't see a thing, nope' because they are afraid we poor little peasants would snap and go apeshit. It reminds me of a booklet my grandfather brought home from the airbase he was stationed on around the time of Blue book. It said "THERE ARE NO UFOS...but if you see one DO NOT FIRE unless fired upon and report it immediately to the base commander". He said 'perfect example of military logic, we refuse to admit anything might exist but don't shoot at the damned thing whatever you do".

      The sad part is if UFOs are real most likely they are doing the same thing we do on those safari tours, pointing out the animals on some "tour of the crazy monkey world". I can just imagine the spiel "And here we have the crazy monkeys in one of their favorite past times, where they throw chunks of metal and primitive chemical rockets at each other in a fight for territory and dominance, most likely for mates and resources. No flurg you may NOT go poke one with a stick, do you have ANY idea what a crazy monkey smells like? you get close enough to poke it with a stick we will never get the stench out of the ship, woof. Oh and here's a treat for those with strong stomachs, over on the left we have two of the monkeys procreating on top of one of their primitive huts. As you can see they haven't developed asexual reproduction which is why we believe they smell so horrible, its most likely used to attract mates and to tell when the female is fertile. Oh it looks like its your lucky day folks, directly in front of us is one of their incredibly primitive flying vehicles, we believe those bulbous things hanging below it is a fetish to show the females how high the pilot ranks with the tribe, now we will play with it a little just so you can see how poorly built these machines are, why they can't even turn sideways!"

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    5. Re:Young and Duke respond "Nope, no anal probing" by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well I personally think its funny that most likely to this very day the US government is working under a 'war of the worlds' rule that says if little green men parked on the White house lawn to get some pics with the Obama cutout they'd be going "aliens? what aliens? didn't see a thing, nope' because they are afraid we poor little peasants would snap and go apeshit.

      Worse, they'd be *illegal* aliens, and there'd be no end of the shit Obama had to hear from the Republican candidates.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    6. Re:Young and Duke respond "Nope, no anal probing" by EvilIdler · · Score: 5, Insightful

      UFOs are real. Most of them are moved to the identified category eventually, though :)

    7. Re:Young and Duke respond "Nope, no anal probing" by operagost · · Score: 2

      They're made of MEAT?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  2. Psychics != Physics. :( by Bahumat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was way more excited about this until I realized I'd misread "psychics" as "physics". Sigh.

    --
    "To pass through the jungle; silence, courtesy, ferocity, as the occasion demands." -- Kamau, "Proper Passage"
    1. Re:Psychics != Physics. :( by Derekloffin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You too huh... it went from, ooo, this could be... oh psychics... well, nothing to see here folks.

    2. Re:Psychics != Physics. :( by icqraid · · Score: 5, Funny

      I too thought it said Physics. I was expecting a logical sequence of empirical data, but I got a post that shouldn't be on slashdot.

    3. Re:Psychics != Physics. :( by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was way more excited about this until I realized I'd misread "psychics" as "physics". Sigh.

      My favorite like about the bankruptcy of The Psychic Friends Network .. They didn't see it coming.

      I would wonder how physics would see something .. physics explain how something is seen: photons launched from star (at C), wavelengths of light, optic receptors, transmission of electrical signals, etc.

      Remote Viewing though ... cough ... If I could do that I'd be looking for gold or diamonds, not space junk on the Moon.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:Psychics != Physics. :( by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, the story is clearly not about actual science, but how crazy some of these remote viewing people can be.

      The group claiming to see the alien ship are not in the least bit credible. Slashdot efditors: If you are going to discuss lunatics, at least get someone with an interesting past. For example:

      Laura Eisenhower, the great-granddaughter of Ike himself, is a whistleblower on the secret Mars colony project!!

      Reading Laura's site, she has a ton of amazing claims, in fact, the missions to Mars are far from being the craziest of her claims. You can tell it is written with sincerity, but I just can't believe a member of the Eisenhower family could be this crazy.

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
    5. Re:Psychics != Physics. :( by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Funny

      If the Psychic Friends Network were actually my friends, they'd be calling me when I had problems to cheer me up.

    6. Re:Psychics != Physics. :( by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Remote Viewing though ... cough ... If I could do that I'd be looking for gold or diamonds, not space junk on the Moon.

      I suspect the market price for aliens space junk is far higher than for mere gold or diamonds.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    7. Re:Psychics != Physics. :( by Lisandro · · Score: 2

      Yea, but is there something see remotely?

    8. Re:Psychics != Physics. :( by Teancum · · Score: 2

      If there is a secret American military base on Mars, when Robert Zurbin finally gets there he'll get to have a house warming party put on by the staff of that base.

      There are so many legitimate stories about spaceflight and real spaceships that it boggles the mind to think that it is worthwhile to even bother reading tripe like this stuff from the "psychics". Sadly, they are drawn to policy discussions about spaceflight and are a part of the conversation even if you think they need to be dismissed completely.

      I do like Buzz Aldrin's solution to nut jobs that say he never walked on the Moon: Simply punching them in the face and telling them to go to hell.

    9. Re:Psychics != Physics. :( by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A nugget of gold in the hand is worth two aliens on the moon.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Psychics != Physics. :( by iter8 · · Score: 2

      Back in the heyday of the psychic networks, I actually got a call from some psychic network, soliciting I guess. I'm not sure how or why they got my phone number. I was dumbstruck for a moment, but then I told them if they were truly psychic they would have known I wouldn't be interested and hung up. Around the same time, I had a buddy who had a girlfriend who was working for some psychic hotline. It was a big scam. Keep the suckers on the line as long as you can and tell them what they want to hear, run up the minutes. She said she was going to quit and go back to phone sex work because it was more honest.

  3. Apollo 18 ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    You're looking at guerrilla marketing for the "Apollo 18" movie, folks. Nothing to see here.

  4. Why?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why the fuck is this bullshit on slashdot??

    1. Re:Why?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It isn't news. It isn't for nerds. And it doesn't matter... that just about wraps it up, doesn't it...

    2. Re:Why?? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Slow day

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    3. Re:Why?? by PJ6 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why the fuck is this bullshit on slashdot??

      It's because we don't have a mechanism to punish or ban people who vote up stories like this.

    4. Re:Why?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why the fuck is this bullshit on slashdot??

      Because we all need a laugh once in a while, even you. Do you need a better reason?

    5. Re:Why?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because you haven't been given the Slashdot Censorship role yet.

    6. Re:Why?? by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      I saw even lamer than that today, announcement of coming "electric planes" with concept pictures from Boeing & etc. of these 737 sized crafts. then one real picture in the article at the end of a real electric plane, a single man craft that was not much more than enclosed ultra-light. Because of course, the state of the art is that batteries are way too fucking heavy to make a craft with tens of thousands of horsepower

    7. Re:Why?? by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

      It could be worse. It could be Digg.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    8. Re:Why?? by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "It's because we don't have a mechanism to punish or ban people who vote up stories like this."
      You mean like the editors?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    9. Re:Why?? by jjp9999 · · Score: 2

      The tag on the post is "It's funny. Laugh." I don't think they posted this believing it was real (at least I hope not).

  5. Way to go "unknown lamer" by X0563511 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This should be in idle, not science.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    1. Re:Way to go "unknown lamer" by Unknown+Lamer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oi, the tagging/section system decided to use science instead of idle despite being tagged idle before science and ... when in doubt, I like to blame Slashcode for my relationship problems.

      --

      HAL 7000, fewer features than the HAL 9000, but just as homicidal!
    2. Re:Way to go "unknown lamer" by jd · · Score: 2

      Depends. If this means Congress will divert a trillion dollars of military spending for NASA to check the claims out, I really wouldn't be crying too hard. After all, there might be turrorists up thar.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re:Way to go "unknown lamer" by Baloroth · · Score: 2

      What will you post tomorrow? What sign of the zodiac is best for getting a job at Google?

      Oh that's easy. Virgo, a.k.a the virgin.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
  6. Alternate headline: by J'raxis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Incredible claim made by group with no credibility."

    Okay then.

  7. My Wallet by residieu · · Score: 2

    I was using Remote Viewing, and I saw that they found my wallet up there too. I'd like it returned. With the $5000 in cash I had in it.

  8. Is there anyway to vote crap like this by liquidweaver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    off the front page? This kind of pollution is really nasty for those of use with an RSS feed, too.

    --
    mov ah, 4ch
    int 21h
  9. Dumbasses by tylersoze · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bah, everyone knows it was Apollo *11* that discovered aliens. They even made a documentary about it where events occurred in real time, it was called "Transformers Presents: Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon: The Quickening" or something like that, by Average American Voter.

    1. Re:Dumbasses by JamesP · · Score: 2

      Nooo, noo!!!

      Of course men never went to the moon!!111

      Would be funny to get them together with moon landing denialists

      I have a feeling that the idea of "the moon conspiracy" is actually a conspiracy in itself. (That is, the real conspiracy is the creation of the idea that men never went to the moon)

       

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  10. All right then ... by quax · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... time to submit all my exciting Nostradamus prediction stories and how it ties in with the world ending in 2012.

    C'mon editors! This is what is now considered front page material?

  11. MPAA by guttentag · · Score: 4, Funny

    The MPAA should hire these guys to lobby Congress on their behalf, because they make a much more convincing argument for blatant bullshit than Chris Dodd ever did.

    1. Re:MPAA by Bradmont · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, the MPAA should sue their arses. Obviously, if they have the power to psychically see things outside of normal line of sight, they must, logically, be watching movies they haven't paid for, and thus causing millions of dollars of sales losses. While they're at it, they should have any domain names associated with the group confiscated, for promoting their illegal and immoral methods of pirate viewing.

  12. Re:Really Guys? by X0563511 · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's your own damn fault for loading the video after reading the summary. ... or did you not read the summary? That will teach you.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  13. Fuck this shit. Last straw. Bye slashdot by syousef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been here for about a decade and a half and I'm done. I do not come here to read about fucking psychics and lately I get real news in popular press before it hits this site. This place was always a nasty one, full of trolls well entrenched along with worthwhile posters, but the news use to be quality and you could get a decent conversation. Now I'd be better off reading the fucking enquirer. Nice knowing you slashdot, don't let the door hit your arse on the way out.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Fuck this shit. Last straw. Bye slashdot by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

      How to tell someone isn't really going to quit /. They talk about quitting /.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  14. is there a movie launch happening? by Sebastopol · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is there a new movie coming out about this or something? I say this because anytime an outlet like The History Channel suddenly starts hyping some weird paranormal event, it is because they were seeded with $$$ by the studio to drum up hype. This story sounds familiar, but I don't see the trailers.

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:is there a movie launch happening? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      As it turns out, actual history is boring to most people, so now its the 'Made up History channel' much more consumer appeal.

      It's a horrible channel with horrible stories.
      I do think there is overall merit to society in having a History channel the take a neutral stance and actual discus aspects of history. Sadly it would need to be government funded.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  15. Re:Thats another low for the slashdot by tripleevenfall · · Score: 3, Funny

    all it's missing is the editorializing in the summary.

    "It will be interesting to see how the corporatist plutocrats in Washington respond to this blowing of the cover-up and how it proves that Google is actually regarded as a diety by every galactic culture but ours..."

  16. Alien press release by funwithBSD · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Aliens released a statement through their spokesman, Giorgio A. Tsoukalos:

    Psychics do not exist. We bred it out of the human race a long time ago.

    Also, Flock of Seagulls is the best band Evah!

    --
    Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  17. Re:Thats another low for the slashdot by Jeng · · Score: 3, Funny

    and how it proves that Google is actually regarded as a diety by every galactic culture but ours..."

    That sounds more plausible than TFA.

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  18. Someone mis-spelled Psychotics by terjeber · · Score: 3, Funny

    EOM

  19. B Ship by Tokolosh · · Score: 3, Funny

    Send them with the hairdressers and telephone sanitizers to find the aliens.

    I just love this concept and will help to make it happen.

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
  20. They observed intelligent life on Moon by Hentes · · Score: 2

    From what I've heard one of the astronauts did see an intelligent living organism climbing out of the moonlander.

  21. Re:Confuse people in to believing you? by Jeng · · Score: 3, Informative

    These people don't need drugs to believe in aliens, they need drugs to not believe in aliens.

    This is taking advantage of the mentally ill.

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  22. The Ancient Pyramids where Landing Pads for Aliens by itsybitsy · · Score: 2

    In fact a documentary series was made about this that reveals all: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dR90P1GhZA4.

  23. I wouldn't say it was aliens, but... by Thud457 · · Score: 2

    usually, I'm above posting the hoary old obligatory XKCD link

    ugh, I feel dirty.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  24. Dialogue by jones_supa · · Score: 2

    Mulder: A group called Transception Incorporated, self-described as an Austin, Texas-based psychic R&D operation, sent a letter to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden that nominates the Apollo 16 crew for the Congressional Space Medal of Honor.

    Scully: Why?

    Mulder: Well, a variety of 'shipwreck elements' on the Moon — described as 'structures, people/aliens, biological technology, and their plight' — were reportedly 'seen' through remote viewing by six experts at Transception. These 'elements' can be seen, along with Apollo 16 moonwalkers John Young and Charles Duke, in photographs during that famous mission, obviously making this the first ever alien encounter.

  25. Check out their website. No, seriously. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At first, I thought this might be a poorly disguised advert for Iron Sky, until I read their 'About Us' page:

    TRANSCEPTION INCORPORATED is a pioneer in the new frontier of mind itself, founded on the premise that (?foreign?) technology can be transferred lawfully from the state of nature from any place in the Universe, in time or space, using a team of highly trained/skilled Controlled Remote Viewers (CRVers). At least by way of the Recommendation for Nomination for the Congressional Space Medal of Honor, submitted to the NASA Administrator on December 15, 2011, TRANSCEPTION has shown that technology can be transferred lawfully from the state of nature from any place in the Universe, in time or space, using a team of highly trained/skilled Controlled Remote Viewers. In sum, TRANSCEPTION INCORPORATED is an R&D company specializing in the exploitation of CRV and other methods to lawfully extract technology from the state of nature as a means for building, licensing, and enforcing its intellectual property (IP) portfolio of patents and copyrights.

    So... "psychic" patent trolls...

    Sylvia Browne is gonna be pissed she didn't think of it first.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  26. This is an embarassment. by Quartus.net · · Score: 2

    This is absolute codswaddle, and is a new low for Slashdot content. Try harder.

  27. Re:Really Guys? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

    It's your own damn fault for loading the video after reading the summary. ... or did you not read the summary? That will teach you.

    Now I don't feel so bad about never reading TFA.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  28. How to downvote? by simoncpu+was+here · · Score: 2

    I wish there was a way to downvote crap articles like this.

  29. Who the hell approved this crap? by DrXym · · Score: 2
    "Psychics" claim all sorts of stuff which invariably is vague enough to be massaged to the facts, part of a shopping list of predictions which can be cherry picked, unfalsifiable, or was obtained by cheating. Or a combination of all those things. Strangely enough their amazing abilities desert them when they are tested in conditions which preclude cheating and require an unambiguous result. Even with a million dollars on the table.

    Remote viewers included. It is trivial enough to test someone's ability to remote view or "astral project" by getting them to draw a picture of something or some object which they cannot see but which is unambiguously identifiable. Funnily enough this doesn't happen either.

    All that has been demonstrated here is if that if you get together 6 credulous idiots in a room they will riff off each others delusions and concoct a story which is not disprovable. What is not so obvious is why this story got approved for Slashdot.

  30. Re:Thats another low for the slashdot by ByOhTek · · Score: 2

    No, I think it's a low, even for idle.

    These "psychics" were probably taking too many drugs while watching Transformers and Apollo 18.

    That, is a much simpler explanation.

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).