Slashdot Mirror


The Web's Worst Privacy Policy

Sparrowvsrevolution writes "With much of the web upset over about Google's latest privacy policy changes, it's helpful to remember it could be much worse: A search engine called Skipity offers the world's worst privacy policy (undoubtedly tongue-in-cheek), filled with lines like this: 'You may think of using any of our programs or services as the privacy equivalent of living in a webcam fitted glass house under the unblinking eye of Big Brother: you have no privacy with us. If we can use any of your details to legally make a profit, we probably will.' The policy gives the company the right to sell any of your data that it wants to any and all corporate customers, send you limitless spam, track your movements via GPS if possible, watch you through your webcam, and implant a chip in your body that is subject to reinstallation whenever the company chooses."

107 comments

  1. Well, at least one company is honest then by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Every time I use Google, I get this unnerving feeling that Larry Page is petting a cat somewhere and telling a henchman "Soon we will have enough to blackmail EVERYONE...bwah, ha, ha, ha!"

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Well, at least one company is honest then by bonch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They already have enough to blackmail everyone.

    2. Re:Well, at least one company is honest then by gmuslera · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oblig xkcd. They just aren't good being evil.

    3. Re:Well, at least one company is honest then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wonder I didn't get that job at Google :-)

    4. Re:Well, at least one company is honest then by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      I don't get it.. What happened in March of '97?

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    5. Re:Well, at least one company is honest then by tgd · · Score: 4, Funny

      They already have enough to blackmail everyone.

      They're not already blackmailing everyone?

      Crap, I wonder who that I payed that rans^H^H^H^Hdonation to?

    6. Re:Well, at least one company is honest then by chronoglass · · Score: 2

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1997
      funding barred for human cloning maybe?

    7. Re:Well, at least one company is honest then by chronoglass · · Score: 1

      or of course.. Hale-bopp!

    8. Re:Well, at least one company is honest then by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2

      That'd explain how they got Senators and Representatives to drop their support of SOPA/PIPA.

      You think it was because of direct grass roots actions?

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    9. Re:Well, at least one company is honest then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the XKCD forum concluded it was most likely a reference to the Heaven's Gate cult

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven's_Gate_(religious_group)

    10. Re:Well, at least one company is honest then by cvtan · · Score: 1

      That should be "Muahh-ha-ha-ha".

      --
      Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    11. Re:Well, at least one company is honest then by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can see it now.

      Hello, Senator. I'm glad you could meet with me. I wanted to talk to you about an... anomaly we noticed with your gmail account. It seems that all of those racy emails you've been sending to your intern—you know, the 15-year-old son of your biggest donor—somehow made their way into a mail queue that is scheduled for delivery to your wife and her divorce attorney some time tomorrow.

      Now I know what you're thinking. How could this happen? We're not really sure. The point is that it has happened. We can make sure those messages never get delivered by deleting the queue, which we'll do, but we need something from you, too. Good. I'm glad we could come to an understanding.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    12. Re:Well, at least one company is honest then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google allows dogs into the buildings, but *not* cats. I don't think Larry likes cats too much.

    13. Re:Well, at least one company is honest then by laejoh · · Score: 1

      Even worse, I have the feeling that Larry Wall is sitting next to him watching the google logs while wearing the xkcd shirt based on comic 208!

    14. Re:Well, at least one company is honest then by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      They're afraid the cats will be smart enough to sense something evil afoot.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    15. Re:Well, at least one company is honest then by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      They already have enough to blackmail everyone.

      Unless all of a sudden a scholarly interest in teenage transsexual prostitutes has become an issue, I'm safe.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  2. Slashdot isn't upset over Google's changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Infiltrated by Google employees and well-wishers, Slashdot consistently offers justifications for every bad behavior and terrible decision coming from Google. Just look at the previous article in which fanboys banded together to make sure Google was perceived as the good guy and that anyone critical of them was modbombed.

    Just to recap, Google is a multibillion dollar advertising megacorporation that was caught by the German government sniffing people's wifi data (they "accidentally" did it for three years before admitting it only when authorities threatened an investigation), forced people to use real names on Google+ and admitted it was an identity service and not a social network, stuffed Google+ results into the search engine without any competing social networks even though they have those networks indexed by the search engine (hello, Microsoft tactics), said that the only people who care about privacy "have something to hide," hacked into Mocality to call its customers, removed H.264 support in Chrome out of "openness" only to turn around ship the closed-source Flash plugin, withheld Android source from the public but shared it with privileged hardware partners so they could have a leg up, abused their Android compatibility program to make things difficult for smartphone makers who chose Bing instead of Google, and on and on and on.

    With all this crap they pull that would get them completely trashed if they were Microsoft or any other company, there's one reason and one reason only that they have been propped up as the good guy on Slashdot all these years--Linux. They use Linux. Slashdot is a Linux advocacy site, and so because Google uses Linux, they are good guys and get a pass for everything. That's all it takes to get Slashdot to love you. Just use Linux.

    Hypocrites. When Microsoft used their Windows monopoly revenues to fund development of Internet Explorer and release it for free to try to dominate the web market, everyone here cried "antitrust!" But when Google uses its web search monopoly revenues to fund development of Android and release it for free to try to dominate smartphones, everyone defends it. For anyone who was on Slashdot during those times, to see Google doing all the very same things Microsoft did but get a completely different reaction is surreal.

    Slashdot is a bubble. You only get pro-Google, pro-Linux news. Major news occurring elsewhere is often days late, if it gets reported at all. The Google+ search results fiasco is huge all over the tech sites right now, but there's nothing about it here, as if it doesn't even exist as a controversy. And did you know iOS surpassed Android in marketshare by the end of 2011 according to three research firms? With how obsessed Slashdot is over marketshare, and how they constantly trumpeted Android's marketshare all the time as a victory last year, you'd think it would be big news. But, no. This is pro-Google territory, pro-Linux territory. Gotta keep the natives happy for more page views.

    This will get modded down because trolls have taken over the moderation system and openly subvert it. That's fine. It just proves my point about how Slashdot reacts to anything outside the partyline. This site's news reporting is old, antiquated, and slow, but the news isn't even why people come here anymore. The part of the community still remaining (after its years-long exodus to Reddit, Hacker News, and other sites, which is why traffic has decreased so dramatically on most Slashdot stories today) only comes here to pat themselves on the back for thinking a certain way. "Yeah, Microsoft is still evil! Yeah, Google is still the good guy! Yeah, Apple is still for chumps!" It's the year 2000 forever on Slashdot.

    1. Re:Slashdot isn't upset over Google's changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen. I'm tired of being modded down for getting angry at Google's increasing shitty behaviour.

    2. Re:Slashdot isn't upset over Google's changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Christopher,

      no time to create new account today?

    3. Re:Slashdot isn't upset over Google's changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow there, the story was posted for one minute and you can already replied with that wall of text. And you was referring to something that hadn't happened at that time (your post was the 2nd post!), man, I am tired of this. Or is this a reverse trolling attempt?

    4. Re:Slashdot isn't upset over Google's changes by openfrog · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Infiltrated by Google employees and well-wishers, Slashdot consistently offers justifications for every bad behavior and terrible decision coming from Google.

      This will get modded down because trolls have taken over the moderation system and openly subvert it. That's fine. It just proves my point about how Slashdot reacts to anything outside the partyline. This site's news reporting is old, antiquated, and slow...

      I was going to mod your trollish, vaguely conspirational, over-the-top comment down indeed, but I will reply instead. You regurgitate all the worn-out memes about the Slashdot community, who is actually anything but of one's mind. Yes, geeks and people who make the effort to think over issues have some stable opinions. This scandalizes you? Tough luck. Yes Google enjoys a favorable opinion here, and why not since their interests and ours coincide in many ways, plus they have shown courage and judgment in their actions (China, SOPA-PIPA). We also happen to know that some well-known PR houses are leading an anti-Google campaign, I understand that the way Steve Ballmer is treated around here may cultivate in him some murderous ideas, which he has actually expressed quite vocally not too long ago, but well, he deserves it.

      Google is not above criticism, but you will surely not convince anyone around here that the bogy stories we read from people like you and the language you use can lead to a well thought, well articulated conversation.

    5. Re:Slashdot isn't upset over Google's changes by Dhalka226 · · Score: 2

      So why are you here?

      Apparently, the reporting is bad. It's slow. it's biased. It's a hive-mind. Antiquated. Outdated. Hypocritical. A bubble. A linux advocacy masquerading as a news site. The moderation system has been openly subverted by trolls and the site itself infiltrated by Google and Google well-wishers. No commenters come here except to reaffirm their opinions with the rest of the hive.

      Yet here you are. I don't understand it.

      only comes here to pat themselves on the back for thinking a certain way

      ...ooh. Got it. By the way, that over there is a mirror bud, give it a shot some time.

    6. Re:Slashdot isn't upset over Google's changes by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      the partyline has been pretty much turning against google lately though, whilst some people think that all anti-google posts are paid, as if they needed to be paid. the reason is pretty simple, not even all google paid employees like what they've been up to lately.

      personally I think converging all services into one is the biggest crap with google lately, of course defaulting to showing page previews and all that crap too. I still use their services but that's just the core services. and sure yeah, they finance a lot of cool stuff - problem there is that they kill a lot of cool stuff too: they become the financier for something cool and then bam they close it up( jaiku & etc, google kiss of death).

      (something funny recently about how they serve ads though. some of the ads go through googleadservices and some don't, I think they're moving all ads to be served from under google.com in order to fight having the googladservices domain blocked).

      as for skippity.. it seems skippity sucks? it just forwards to bing.com? or perhaps they're getting hammered with too many visits and they resorted to that? duckduckgo seems like a better option now.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:Slashdot isn't upset over Google's changes by epine · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, geeks and people who make the effort to think over issues have some stable opinions.

      In the case of Google, had some stable opinions. In many ways the USSR brought out the worst in America. Now Facebook is doing the same to Google.

      The underlying problem, I think, is that Google's advertising service doesn't have a strong market lock-in. If search shifts to local over night, Google is hosed. Social has more lock-in than search.

      Google has done much to admire. I'm still hoping this is just a phase. It's particularly galling to have to put up with all these Google+ changes designed to nobble Facebook, because I never gave a rat's ass about Facebook in the first place. I wish they would pat my cookies down, then denude my pages of all share and plus icons. Now I have two boy prostitutes pawing at me, instead of one. Don't you get it? You're not my thing.

    8. Re:Slashdot isn't upset over Google's changes by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      ...and what is your point exactly

    9. Re:Slashdot isn't upset over Google's changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      actually, ALL of you are part of a campaign, deliberate or not, to poison slashdot, which alone is more worth, has created more insight, than google, microsoft, apple, facebook and twitter combined.

      this used to be a vestige of cynical people who aren't fucking stupid, now it's endless bickering about some prostitute corporations, as if those didn't have their own PR outlets. cut it out, all of you. anyone who reads any of it, or spends a single mod point on something that is PURE NOISE, is basically a traitor and part of the problem.

    10. Re:Slashdot isn't upset over Google's changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google did shit all against SOPA. They should have done much more.

      --Big Google Fan.

    11. Re:Slashdot isn't upset over Google's changes by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know about him but as for me....some of us miss the old days? Slashdot USED to be the kind of place where there would be a 300+ posting arguing merits of various file systems, various features of different OSes and even if you didn't agree with a poster dammit you LEARNED because everyone brought their A games and you might even end of with some of the guys who actually wrote the thing involved in the conversation. Once we were having a conversation on various quantum theories and when i spoke up and said i was having trouble grasping a concept someone who was actually working at one of the particle accelerators came on and nicely explained in layman's terms the particular quantum effect they were shooting for and why that would be useful in computing. it was quite nice and very civil.

      Now you won 't get two posts in before its crapflodded with "die" "go fuck yourself" "your a shill for (insert company)' frankly 4chan is often more civil than the dick waving fanbois we have around here now breaking the flow and fucking things up. you can't simply surf at a higher level because some of them are making 200+ accounts to get modpoints to modbomb with and often anyone that dares to not suck the koolaid they are guzzling by the gallon becomes an "enemy of freedom/truth/puppies" and will be constantly modbombed. As far as I've been able to pick up the current fanboi raging hard on list is FOSS yay, Apple yay unless its VS FOSS then boo, MSFT boo, Canonical can be yay or boo depending on the day of the week,Oracle used to be yay because they were competing with MSFT until they bought sun so they are now boo, Google yay no matter what, its all just fanboi dick waving which doesn't matter what kind of citations you provide its groupthink or bust.

      and THAT is why /. has seen its numbers dropping like a stone, because people are getting sick of the bullshit and bile thanks to the broken mod system encouraging douchebaggery. As soon as i can find a website similar to what /. USED to be i'll be moving on, but its not easy finding tech sites that aren't just commercials in website format. But i can understand his frustration because those of us that remember what this site was like in the late 90s/early 00s can tell you it was NOTHING like this, it was a place geeks of all kinds would go and discuss all matter of gear and tech and learn quite a bit in the process. the only thing I've learned here in the past few years is there is an amazing amount of ways one can combine curse words and insults I previously didn't know about. Oh and to make the fanbois (or those with a perception bubble as I've been told is a more civil way to say that) feel at home let me say "All go to hell except cave 76!" and you can just insert whatever makes you go squee for cave 76 and feel accepted.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    12. Re:Slashdot isn't upset over Google's changes by russotto · · Score: 3, Funny

      Slashdot USED to be the kind of place where there would be a 300+ posting arguing merits of various file systems, various features of different OSes and even if you didn't agree with a poster dammit you LEARNED because everyone brought their A games and you might even end of with some of the guys who actually wrote the thing involved in the conversation.

      No, Grandpa Simpson, it never was. Perhaps you're thinking of Usenet before the Great Renaming?

    13. Re:Slashdot isn't upset over Google's changes by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      You regurgitate all the worn-out memes about the Slashdot community

      The sad thing is he isn't even trying. I mean, even Natalie Portman covered in tobasco ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H hot grits while (wooshing over Ethanol-fueled) would have the decency to post an obligatory xkcd.

      F-F-F-FIVE MEME COMBO!

    14. Re:Slashdot isn't upset over Google's changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except FB is losing members in NA.

    15. Re:Slashdot isn't upset over Google's changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boy prostitute 1: Facebook Boy prostitute 2: GooglePlus Pawing: seeing Facebook and GooglePlus icons every time you read an online article.

    16. Re:Slashdot isn't upset over Google's changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      U Mad?

  3. Unconscionability by Literaphile · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's obviously a joke, but, that said, courts will not necessarily enforce contracts that are so one-sided as to be entirely unconscionable or ludicrous. I'm pretty sure this fits the definition...

    1. Re:Unconscionability by The+Mister+Purple · · Score: 1

      I give them points for honestly. If you don't agree to the terms, don't use the service. And the GPS chip implant surgery only hurts for a few minutes.

      --
      "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." Feynman
    2. Re:Unconscionability by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they're hiring? Certainly they'll treat their employees better than they do their product, um, customers. Right?

    3. Re:Unconscionability by stoofa · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are you seriously telling me this wouldn't stand up in court: http://www.sleepdictionary.com/legal.html Damn. That lawyer owes me those two beers back.

    4. Re:Unconscionability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although Sleep Dictionary is a dynamic and forward looking company that values the growth and the personal progression of like minded young talent, we would advise against anyone attempting to make a career out of pointing at this website and saying "Spleen."

      Although we would be the last people to stand in the way of any entrepreneurial spirit, there is no viable business model that can be built around pointing at websites and no known commercial value to naming internal organs at random.

      Even if you were to point at an awful lot of websites throughout the day and name dozens of the body's marvellous internal systems, there would still be no chance of turning this into a full time occupation with any logical career path that could earn you a decent wage.

    5. Re:Unconscionability by allo · · Score: 1

      they will not enforce them, if it seems like one side tried to hide something in there. but this one is obviously purely honest, so there is nothing hidden, it just IS the worst pp ever. deal with it.

    6. Re:Unconscionability by nasirg · · Score: 1

      software store new look shoes Thanks for taking the time to discuss and share this with us, I for one feel strongly about it and really enjoyed learning more about this topic. I can see that you possess a degree of expertise on this subject, I would very a lot like to hear much more from you on this subject matter

  4. This place doesn't give a shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Slashdot became Google's cheerleader long ago. Google can do no wrong here. Their evil is so obvious that competitors are openly satirizing their insane privacy violations with fake privacy policies and "Don't Be Evil" bookmarklets, but Slashdot still won't give a shit because OMG THEY USE OPEN SOURCE!!!1

  5. Que the evilest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when does Apple sue them for IP infringement?

  6. Re:Organized trolling campaign by GreatBunzinni by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck off with this shit already. It's getting old.

    We're not retarded. We'll figure out how we should mod each comment.

  7. Direct Link by Jeng · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is a direct link to the privacy policy.

    http://skipity.com/privacy

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    1. Re:Direct Link by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      It's the Privacy Policy equiv of All Your Base Are Belong To Us.

      Now if they had a built in game and it was fun, they'd pwn half the web by now.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Direct Link by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      By visiting that link you automatically agree to the (Lack of) Privacy Policy.

      You know what? I don't think I'll click that link.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  8. I am shocked by Scareduck · · Score: 5, Informative

    that no one has yet mentioned that Skipity is just a front for Bing.

    --

    Dog is my co-pilot.

    1. Re:I am shocked by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's more like a second-rate StumbleUpon.

      --
      "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    2. Re:I am shocked by awrowe · · Score: 2

      You mean, except in the article?

      --
      A.I. Research. The peculiar science in which we know the question and we know the answer, but can't show the working
    3. Re:I am shocked by Insightfill · · Score: 1

      [I am shocked]...that no one has yet mentioned that Skipity is just a front for Bing.

      You mean, except in the article?

      To be fair, nobody around here reads the articles, so I appreciate the grandparent post helping out.

  9. Haw-haw, get it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haw-haw, get it, because Apple sues everybody for nothing, right?

    This is totally not a rip-off!

    Neither is this!

    Or this!

    Yep, Apple totally has no right to be suing anybody for stealing their design work.

    1. Re:Haw-haw, get it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, funnily enough, design patents don't really hold up in court when you can find prior art. Oh wait, you mean you thought Apple had come up with a unique enough design for a design patent? Hahahaha.

  10. Re:Organized trolling campaign by GreatBunzinni by jd · · Score: 1

    http://kimvention2012.com/

    Because it's closer to being the least bit interesting than your waffle.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  11. They've always been good at it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They've always been good at it. They've just been media darlings for so long that they got away with it. But the tide is turning: look at Google Plus Your Search. It's so controversial that Larry Page threatened critical employees that if they didn't like it, they should be working somewhere else.

    Google has become another big corporation never happy with the money it's making. Facebook has replaced email and other aspects of the web, and that threatens Google's advertising dollars, which is over 98% of their revenue source.

    1. Re:They've always been good at it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that first part never actually happened, BTW. It was just a (false) rumor.

    2. Re:They've always been good at it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hm, nope, sorry, the frothing at my mouth, the yummy taste of my own bile, and the warm feeling of my blood pressure shooting through the roof disagree with your facts.

      Besides, I hate, and as we all know, hate is the only sign of authenticity on teh intarnets. You can't honestly say you like anything unless you're a shill. You know how all those shills like things? Case proven. HATE HATE HATE HATE

  12. Skipity? Nah! by reboot246 · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's actually the privacy policy of the United States Federal government.

    And getting worse every day . . . .

    1. Re:Skipity? Nah! by Xacid · · Score: 1

      Yet there's something appealing about its outright honesty regarding the issue at hand as opposed to the usual distraction of "Think of the children/country/lawyers/artists/puppies/etc"...

  13. He says what everybody else does. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you read every website's privacy, usage, terms of use, and every other linked "agreements" every single one without exception has these vague legalese clauses that basically say what this guy says.

    If it were not, you probably would not have a Facebook, Twitter, or LinkedIn account:

    I deleted my LinkedIn account because they will turn into another FB - only they have a more targeted marketing system.

    Want to market shit to just programmers? LinkedIN

    Accountants? Lawyers? Project Mangers?

    LinkedIN.

  14. viewing the word "Skipity" by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    (or sensing it via some any other means) Indicates acceptance of the agreement. As does closing this browser or browsing to another page.

    --
    Nullius in verba
  15. Re:Organized trolling campaign by GreatBunzinni by somersault · · Score: 0

    Sorry to be the one to break this to you, but it's quite possible that there are two real racists on Slashdot. Maybe more! In the short term a post may have a silly moderation like that, but over the course of a day or two things will usually average out.

    Besides - if you're the original AC, you're the one who is creating multiple accounts for the purposes of shilling and up-modding yourself, so you have no right to complain.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  16. "Or as allowed by law" by wurp · · Score: 2

    Most privacy policies are just as bad as the "worst" privacy policy: https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=privacy+%22or+as+allowed+by+law%22

    Note that they give a bunch of circumstances in which they will use your private information, but then they add in "or as *allowed* by law" which means they can do absolutely anything with your information that isn't illegal.

    Somehow I think people misread it as "or as required by law" which is an altogether different thing.

  17. "It could be worse" & "... not as bad as" by eepok · · Score: 1

    Note to humanity, if your judgement is a comparison of "what is" and "the worst of all possible situations", you will allow yourself to be harmed up until the time where you ARE in the worst of all known situations... and it will be too late to act.

    No, Google is not the worst of all possible situations, but they have acted sufficiently for us all too be concerned about what they do now, what they can do now, and what they are able and willing to do in the future.

  18. in another news... by alien9 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Slashdot's policy allows its system to thrash anyone's KARMA at will.

  19. Re:bonch is a pro-Apple, Anti-Google shill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and keep humping his leg with your false dichotomy of google vs. apple. and/or microsoft.

  20. Strange behaviour by johnsnails · · Score: 1

    I just went to skipity.com in an incognito session and in the search box it already had some of my sear queries from google? Is that strange?

    1. Re:Strange behaviour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's the default auto-complete that Google has since disabled. Your browser recognizes the search box as looking enough like Google's that it's auto-suggesting things for you to type.

      Good tip, though, because it let me clear out the suggestion list, since Google disabling the built-in autocomplete also prevents you from deleting the autocomplete history.

  21. NEWS for Nerds.. by anomaly256 · · Score: 2

    NEWS.

    This isn't news by any stretch of the meaning.. And a viral marketing campaign posted to the front page yesterday about psychics remote sensing aliens? Jesus Slashdot.. NO news is better than turning yourself into a tabloid. Please stop with the posting of non-events and get back to the real reporting :(

    1. Re:NEWS for Nerds.. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      it's funny.

      laugh.

      Because the alternative is crying when you realize that other privacy policies are just as bad with out the veneer of satire.

      Also, the psychics and aliens thing was supposed to go on Idle. And it was updated to be on idle. Unknown Lamer even posted in the thread about it.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    2. Re:NEWS for Nerds.. by anomaly256 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's as funny as you think it is. I dunno, maybe the quality bar for comedy these days has been lowered a fair bit but I find reading *this* kind of article as tedious and uninspired. Ok, sure, mocking the potential reality we might soon face.. people need that. But then it's not funny then either, it's somber trying to appear funny.

      Regarding the alien psychics thing: Accident acknowledged.

    3. Re:NEWS for Nerds.. by anomaly256 · · Score: 1

      Btw, I would also nominate this article for relocation to Idle like the alien psychics thing.

  22. BBC is that you by physburn · · Score: 0

    Serious, want to do be within a kilometer of a user computer when the click is on.

  23. Re:There's no other way to criticize Google by Nerdfest · · Score: 4, Informative

    How about this one.

  24. Re:iOS now has more marketshare than Android by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I know I bit earlier when this came up, but, can we get some better copy/pasta trolling?

    I miss the Golden Girls and on a very strange level, goatse.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  25. Sounds like someone's beta testing... by forkfail · · Score: 1

    ... this license. Expect it to go into production sometime next year across the web.

    --
    Check your premises.
  26. I prefer this disclaimer... ;) by antdude · · Score: 4, Funny

    "This product is meant for educational purposes only. Any resemblance to real persons living or dead is purely coincidental. Void where prohibited. Some assembly required. List each check separately by bank number. Batteries not included. Contents may settle during shipment. Use only as directed. No other warranty expressed or implied. Do not use while operating a motor vehicle or heavy equipment. Postage will be paid by addressee. Subject to CAB approval. This is not an offer to sell securities. Apply only to affected area. May be too intense for some viewers. Do not stamp. Use other side for additional listings. For recreational use only. Do not disturb. All models over 18 years of age. If condition persists, consult your physician. No user-serviceable parts inside. Freshest if eaten before date on carton. Subject to change without notice. Times approximate. Simulated picture. No postage necessary if mailed in the United States. Please remain seated until the ride has come to a complete stop. Breaking seal constitutes acceptance of agreement. For off-road use only. As seen on TV. One size fits all. Many suitcases look alike. Contains a substantial amount of non-tobacco ingredients. Colors may fade. We have sent the forms which seem right for you. Slippery when wet. For office use only. Not affiliated with the American Red Cross. Drop in any mailbox. Edited for television. Keep cool; process promptly. Post office will not deliver without postage. List was current at time of printing. Return to sender, no forwarding order on file, unable to forward. Not responsible for direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages resulting from any defect, error or failure to perform. At participating locations only. Not the Beatles. Penalty for private use. See label for sequence. Substantial penalty for early withdrawal. Do not write below this line. Falling rock. Lost ticket pays maximum rate. Your canceled check is your receipt. Add toner. Place stamp here. Avoid contact with skin. Sanitized for your protection. Be sure each item is properly endorsed. Sign here without admitting guilt. Slightly higher west of the Mississippi. Employees and their families are not eligible. Beware of dog. Contestants have been briefed on some questions before the show. Limited time offer, call now to ensure prompt delivery. You must be present to win. No passes accepted for this engagement. No purchase necessary. Processed at location stamped in code at top of carton. Shading within a garment may occur. Use only in a well-ventilated area. Keep away from fire or flames. Replace with same type. Approved for veterans. Booths for two or more. Check here if tax deductible. Some equipment shown is optional. Price does not include taxes. No Canadian coins. Not recommended for children. Prerecorded for this time zone. Reproduction strictly prohibited. No solicitors. No alcohol, dogs or horses. No anchovies unless otherwise specified. Restaurant package, not for resale. List at least two alternate dates. First pull up, then pull down. Call toll free number before digging. Driver does not carry cash. Some of the trademarks mentioned in this product appear for identification purposes only. Objects in mirror may be closer than they appear. Record additional transactions on back of previous stub. Unix is a registered trademark of AT&T. Do not fold, spindle or mutilate. No transfers issued until the bus comes to a complete stop. Package sold by weight, not volume. Your mileage may vary. Known as Hellman's east of the Rockies. Beware of greeks bearing gifts. Beware of gifts bearing greeks. This side up. Don't take any wooden nickels. Don't take candy from strangers. Void where prohibited. Caveat Emptor (Buyer beware) Caveat Vendor (Beware of street people). Donde esta el bano. Beware of DOS. Look both ways before crossing the street. All your base are belong to us. Always wear safety belt. Always wear deodorant. Don't forget to breathe. If you park, don't drink...accidents cause people. This supersedes all previous notices.

    This modified disclaimer may not be copied without the expressed written consent of whoever I stole it from."

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:I prefer this disclaimer... ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it then that it is only for education of recreational uses?

  27. I already know which XKCD you're linking to... by DangerOnTheRanger · · Score: 1

    ... Is that a bad thing?

  28. implant a chip in your body? even a job can't do by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    implant a chip in your body?
    even for a job they can't make you do that I don't thing this will hold up in any court.

  29. Skipity is just ahead of their time by locopuyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Skipity is just ahead of their time. Just wait 10 years in the future and they will all be like this. The Patriot Act, the NDAA, the ever expanding TSA. It is only a matter of time.

  30. You mean- "The Web's BEST Privacy Policy"!!! by alphacharliezero · · Score: 2

    Really? That is the BEST privacy policy I've ever seen. As proof I offer the fact that I actually read it all the way through, and enjoyed reading it. Neither of those things has ever happened before...

  31. You are an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And probably a shill for a competitor. I have not seen valid criticism of Google getting down modded. I have only seen shill posts like yours with no substance get modded down to oblivion. The only tech columnists reporting this conspiratorial stuff with no basis in facts are people like MG Siegler or other well known idiots that are paid by Apple or Microsoft.

    1. Re:You are an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have not seen valid criticism of Google getting down modded.

      I have. All the time.

      Oh, and the rest of your post...can you say "confirmation"? Read his post, then read yours. Do it until you understand. Idiot yourself.

  32. Re:bonch is a pro-Apple, Anti-Google shill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    He's paid by Yahoo! to post that.

  33. Helpful? by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 2

    With much of the web upset over about Google's latest privacy policy changes, it's helpful to remember it could be much worse

    Helpful in what way? In an "sure, our president (for example) is doing something very bad, but it's helpful to remember a worse leader in history: Hitler" sort of way?

    --
    Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
    1. Re:Helpful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Godwin!

    2. Re:Helpful? by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

      Considering ALL godwin says is that the onger a discussion drags on, the more likely the reference to Nazis, Hitler, etc would be made, so what? The law doesn't do more than to point out an inevitability, and I wish SOME of the people out there who scream Godwin would get that.

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  34. No to Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to stop using Gmail, any better alternatives

    1. Re:No to Gmail by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      I bought a server from Hetzner and run Zimbra Collaboration Server Open Source Edition on it.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  35. Safe Harbor expired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the Europeans they mention the Safe Harbor program, yet their certification seem to have expired:
      http://safeharbor.export.gov/companyinfo.aspx?id=10543
    They should remove that from the policy then. Or just self certify themselves, lol.

  36. Bottom Line It, Anyone? by assertation · · Score: 1

    What is the bottom line on Google's new consolidated privacy policy? What was private before that is now not private?

    1. Re:Bottom Line It, Anyone? by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      The bottom line is that you are using Google's services FREE OF CHARGE and if you don't like their new privacy policy then you are free to use some other service, free or paid, of your own choice. And if you believe the outrage will be/is so tremendous, feel free to start your own competing services with a 'better' policy.

    2. Re:Bottom Line It, Anyone? by assertation · · Score: 1

      Thanks for being the man's bitch, giving me his static and telling me nothing

  37. Ding Ding! We have ourselves a winner! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, Grandpa Simpson, it never was. Perhaps you're thinking of Usenet before the Great Renaming?

    Yay for Russotto (537200)

    Thanks for proving the rule.

  38. Re:bonch is a pro-Apple, Anti-Google shill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Checking your post closely reveals a disk, a black flap, and a scorpion. Truly marvelous.