Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Create World's First Atomic X-Ray Laser

New submitter newmission33 writes "Government researchers have created the fastest, purest X-ray laser pulses ever achieved, and have fulfilled a 1967 prediction that an atomic scale X-ray laser could be made in the same manner as visible-light lasers, according to a statement released Wednesday. Researchers at the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory used the Linac Coherent Light Source to aim a powerful X-ray source beam, a billion times brighter than any previous source, at a capsule of neon gas and triggered an 'avalanche' of X-ray emissions to become the world's first 'atomic X-ray laser.'"

24 of 145 comments (clear)

  1. 1950s buzzword salad by SoupGuru · · Score: 5, Funny

    Throw in a "jet" and "rocket" and I think we'll be all set.

    --
    What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
    1. Re:1950s buzzword salad by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 3, Funny

      We are LIVING in the FUTURE, people! Now we can have x-rays of sharks with x-ray lasers strapped to their fricken heads.

    2. Re:1950s buzzword salad by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Nylon"

  2. is an xray pump laser truly needed? by wierd_w · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't mean if this is useful or not, the article clearly states how it is.

    I mean, the pump laser, the one that excites the lasing medium (in this case neon gas). Does it have to be x-ray?

    Would a coherent beam of some other, more easily produced frequency, or even a highly charged cathode beam, be sufficient to induce the xray emission cascade as well?

    1. Re:is an xray pump laser truly needed? by interval1066 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "A laser is coherent light? So it talks?"

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    2. Re:is an xray pump laser truly needed? by toQDuj · · Score: 5, Informative

      As far as my knowledge goes, yes the pump laser has to be X-ray. The energy of the emitted photons from the laser are always lower than the excitation energy of the lasing medium. So you need the high photon energy of x-rays to excite the medium to lase photons of lower (but still x-ray) energy.

      --
      Every experiment which ends in a big bang is a good experiment.
    3. Re:is an xray pump laser truly needed? by jd2112 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "A laser is coherent light? So it talks?"

      More intelligently than many of the threads on Slashdot.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    4. Re:is an xray pump laser truly needed? by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Interesting

      while normally true there is a type of laser called an up-conversion laser, whereby two or more photons excite an ion to release energy greater than the pumping frequency.

    5. Re:is an xray pump laser truly needed? by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Informative

      The LCLS isn't really a laser. It's a coherent synchrotron radiation source. But yes, intense x-rays are required to knock electrons out of the inner shells of the neon atoms.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  3. Re:Quick! Get the LASER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That will be difficult since your average bacterium lacks an anus - wait, what?

  4. Re:This by wierd_w · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nonsense.

    This is a fantastic advancement. Remember those photographs of alkanes that showed the P orbital zones slashdot ran a story on sometime last year

    Remember how fuzzy they were?

    This badboy would make thoe pictures much, much clearer.

  5. Re:I don't know what an atomic x-ray laser is... by wierd_w · · Score: 5, Informative

    Disect the terms.

    Atomic = the lasing medium is made of single, free atoms of the same element.

    Xray = emits photons in the xray portion of the spectrum.

    Laser = light is amplified by the stimulated emission of radiation. A source light source causes electrons in the laser's gain medium to fall out of their normal orbitals. When the fall back in, they emit a photon of a very specific wavelength. These photons bump more electrons out, more photons get produced, and the beam amplifies.

    So, an atomic xray laser is a laser using atomic monomers as the gain medium, that produces coherent xray radiation.

    Now then. Xray radiation is a powerful ionising radiation. This is not a toy. It does very bad things to living tissue, and can destroy chemical bonds purely from the beam's energy. It is a penetrating radiation, and is therefor dangerous even through walls. Keep out of reach of children and slashdot posters.

  6. Re:This by wierd_w · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8225491.stm

    These were taken with an AFM, (atomic force microscope. Essentially a single atom stuck to the end of a nanoscopic cantelever) but this xray laser light source would theoretically permit direct image capture, at very high speeds.

    Xray wavelengths are very tiny. The only light with a smaller wavelength is gamma ray emissions.

    Xrays are frequently used to study crystal structues, but the very precise nature and rapid activation speed of this source makes it useful for a whole lot more.

  7. Not like a standard laser by Laser+Dan · · Score: 4, Informative

    I wouldn't call this laser "the same manner as visible-light lasers" really, it lacks one of the fundamental features of a normal laser - self amplification via feedback from mirrors.
    It sounds like this could be the _basis_ for a laser, as a pump source causes superluminescence, but without feedback it won't be particularly directional.
    Perhaps if it can be triggered to start the avalanche at one end a directional burst could be achieved though, kind of like a nitrogen laser.

    1. Re:Not like a standard laser by wierd_w · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can't think of any materials with which to create an xray mirror... not of sufficient quality anyway. Without some of those, and an xray beam splitter, you couldn't possibly self amplify...

      If this were built on a very tiny scale, so that the neon atoms were all in a row (trap them inside a nanotube maybe?) Perahps a nanoscale version could be made directional? (Or at least have a directional bias)

    2. Re:Not like a standard laser by joe_frisch · · Score: 5, Informative

      Grazing incidence mirrors work well - we use them to steer the main X-ray beam. The mirror system we have works up to 24 KeV X-rays but with shallower angles you could go higher.

      You can also use crystals to reflect X-rays over large angles - even 180 degrees using Bragg diffraction. The limit here is that the X-ray beam needs to be almost exactly a single wavelength.

      --- Joe Frisch

    3. Re:Not like a standard laser by joe_frisch · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The main LCLS X-ray laser also works without mirrors, but it has so much gain that the final beam is pretty close to transform limit in the transverse - almost a coherent as a conventional laser.

      --- Joe Frisch
      SLAC

  8. Re:I don't know what an atomic x-ray laser is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    HIgher energy X-rays are penetrating, but these are of fairly low energy. The Nature abstract (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v481/n7382/full/nature10721.html) gives a bit more info. The X-ray energy is 849 eV. X-rays at this energy which are actually attenuated pretty well by air, and certainly by walls.

  9. Re:This by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Remember how fuzzy they were?

    This badboy would make thoe pictures much, much clearer.

    Actually, those pictures are fuzzy partly because the orbitals themselves are fuzzy. You probably can't get much more detail than that; the detail doesn't exist.

    At any rate, X-rays interacting with a single molecule like this one would likely knock electrons right off of it, thereby disrupting the very thing you're trying to image. Crystal X-ray diffraction imaging doesn't have that problem because of the countless copies of molecules available.

  10. Re:This by toygeek · · Score: 5, Funny

    You probably can't get much more detail than that; the detail doesn't exist.

    You just have to Zoom, then Enhance.

  11. Re:I don't know what an atomic x-ray laser is... by joe_frisch · · Score: 3, Informative

    We treat the X-ray safety in a way similar to the high energy beam safety at the lab. Shielding, interlocked doors, monitoring, etc. For the soft X-rays in this experiment there is very little risk, they don't go far through air, but for hard X-ray operation we need to use more protection.

    -- -Joe Frisch

  12. Re:Burning question by joe_frisch · · Score: 3, Funny

    The main X-ray laser is about a mile long. We are working on breeding bigger sharks......

  13. Re:This by Ruie · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's how LHC works, they just use particles other than gamma rays. 3.5 TeV corresponds to wavelength of 2e-19 m.

  14. Re:Death ray by Stargoat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hmmm. Meant to publish that anonymously. Whoopsie. Hope I never run for office.

    --
    Hoist Number One and Number Six.