Slashdot Mirror


Graphene Membranes Superpermeable to Water

Dr Max writes "Not only is graphene the strongest, thinnest and best conducting material known to man, it is now shown to have superpermeability with respect to water as well. This allows a membrane made with graphene to pass water right through it (PDF), while another atom or molecule (even helium) gets blocked. 'The properties are so unusual that it is hard to imagine that they cannot find some use in the design of filtration, separation or barrier membranes and for selective removal of water,' said one of the researchers."

28 of 292 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Does this mean... by imboboage0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    After reading the second article, I'm not sure. I didn't read in detail, but they did some experiments with a pump. I'm not sure if it's required, but that is how they did it to research it.

    --
    Honesty may be the best policy, but by process of elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
  2. Used to collect gifts from Shai-Hulud by geekopus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now we know what the water receptacles in Dune were made of.

  3. Super desalination? by Draconi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Press and squeeze a hydraulic press of water through a few layers of graphene = no more salty water?

    1. Re:Super desalination? by RussellSHarris · · Score: 3, Informative

      Please, stop spreading the FUD. Regular tap water can just as well cause water intoxication if you drink too much of it, and ultra-pure water is by no means unsafe to drink.

  4. Fresh water? by gmuslera · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So you could pass thru i.e. ocean or contaminated water and get fresh, drinkable, pure water on the other side? If that could scale could be great.

    1. Re:Fresh water? by iggymanz · · Score: 3

      nonsense, that (water intoxication) only happens if you drink too much water (whether 100% pure or not)

    2. Re:Fresh water? by rmstar · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can't drink pure H2O - it disrupts ionic balance, you could probably die from drinking too much pure water.

      What you need is to make sure you obtain the electrolytes and minerals from some other source to avoid insufficiency. Other than that, pure water is safe to drink.

    3. Re:Fresh water? by countertrolling · · Score: 3, Informative

      All water is recycled. Every water molecule on the planet is at least 4.5 billion years old. All the dinosaur turds and spuge have been filtered out.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    4. Re:Fresh water? by tzot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The atoms might be at least 4.5 billion years old, but not *every* molecule of water is of that age.

      --
      I speak England very best
    5. Re:Fresh water? by cunniff · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Spend a little time thinking about it, and you will realize that distilled water urban legend is silly. In your mouth, it is mixed with saliva and mucous and whatever else is stuck to your teeth, gums, and tongue. The instant it hits your stomach, it is mixed with stomach acids and whatever you ate recently. I.e. it is no longer pure distilled water. From there, the molecules wander through your body like any other water molecule. Distilling water does not give its component molecules magic properties.

    6. Re:Fresh water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      He's not spreading FUD. Pure H2O is possibly the most corrosive chemical in the universe and IS certainly the most corrosive chemical in the known universe. The second the stuff hits your mouth it'll leech all the minerals from your teeth. God only know what it would do to the soft tissues, but you can be certain the sodium will be gone and the cell membranes will collapse due to the saline imbalance. Nerves would certainly be rendered useless in the vicinity of the water contact as well. It would literally be safer to drink lye.

      I remember in college a problem we had in the physics department, they were using super clean water because they needed to minimize diffraction through it, and within a couple hours the vessel holding the water shattered because the water had sucked all the minerals out of the glass.

      Don't underestimate the power of the hydrogen bond.

    7. Re:Fresh water? by Tsingi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Water is formed from hydrogen and oxygen. It is not inert, it decomposes and reforms constantly. So, no, water molecules are not at least 4.5 billion years old.

      The hydrogen and oxygen atoms that make up water, or at least most of them, may well be much older than that. Particularly the hydrogen, which may be over 13 billion years old.

    8. Re:Fresh water? by Russ1642 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Informative? How about flamebait. This is simply not true. Absolutely insanely pure water is just water. Your body doesn't react to a 0.0001% difference in dissolved solids. After a microsecond in your mouth the water is far from pure.

    9. Re:Fresh water? by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Funny

      Fresh water, salt, AND anchovies.

      And mermaids. You ever had sex with a mermaid? Blows your mind, man. I can't even begin to imagine what it would be like to do a live one.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    10. Re:Fresh water? by WebSorcerer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm a Ph.D. Chemist who has done some water purification studies. One difficulty is the build-up of particulate matter on/in the filter which slows down (eventually stops) flow through the filter.

      This problem can be addressed with the use of two filters in parallel, one of which is being back-flushed while the other operates. With the current types of filters, the system eventually plugs due to micro particulates. Perhaps this Graphine filter is immune to plugging, and merely flushing the surface will clean it.

      As you may have surmised from previous posts, it holds out the possibility of a limitless supply of potable water. What a boon to mankind!!

  5. Important detail by zAPPzAPP · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's not mentioned in the opener, but the article says it lets water "evaporate" through it.
    So it's not like you can just pour water on it, and let it drip through.

    I wonder if this just means steam can pass through it, or if it has to evaporate on the graphene for it to get through?
    If it was the former, then why are they wording it so complicated?

  6. graphene oxide, not graphene by THE_WELL_HUNG_OYSTER · · Score: 5, Informative

    The material they used was NOT graphene. It was graphene oxide.

  7. Journalist != scientist by tomhath · · Score: 3, Interesting

    graphene-based membranes are impermeable to all gases and liquids (vacuum-tight). However, water evaporates through them as quickly as if the membranes were not there at all.

    Thanks for clarifying that. Anyway, this is a very amazing material.

  8. Re:Does this mean... by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...you don't need a pressure source like you do for reverse osmosis?

    Even if it does not, I would think it would be much more resilient toward chlorine and iron. Perhaps it won't need as much pretreatment done to the water as a conventional film membrane requires. Currently most decent RO systems have a 10 micron sediment filter, followed by 5 and 1 micron carbon filters. If you have high iron content in the feed water, then you need a softener or some other way to reduce it prior to the sediment filter too. Since the three RO pre-filters typically need to be replaced every 6-12 months, they are the most frequent replacement item. A typical RO membrane last 2-5 years. Perhaps this would be lengthened too.

  9. Re:wonder substance by Bill+Hayden · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, just as a floor wax at this point.

    --
    Protect your browser with the Force Safe Search add-on
  10. Graphene Condom? by swb · · Score: 4, Funny

    Lets all the delicious moisture through, blocks the stuff you want blocked???

  11. If it blocks Helium by DickBreath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If it blocks Helium this has very important applications.

    Helium molecules are very small. It is difficult to contain Helium gas in cylinders.

    There are even far more important applications for the global economy. It may finally be possible to make Helium balloons that don't leak the tiny molecules so quickly.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  12. Re:Does this mean... by chill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, but here they're showing that the membrane allows WATER through but will stop HELIUM. If I'm not mistaken, helium molecules are smallerthan water molecules. That's the freakish quality.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  13. Re:Does this mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're using energy to get that water higher than it's final location, just like a pump.

  14. Re:Does this mean... by slew · · Score: 3, Informative

    There has also been studies showing you can make a selective filter by making nanotubes with the right diameter to let water through but not larger molecules. In addition because the walls are so "smooth" there is much less pressure to flow the water through then expected.

    Although I doubt this orientation will allow for filtering out "helium" as the original posting.

    The mechanims that the original posting paper is speculating, it that the way they made the graphene oxide (not pure graphene) membrane, it is has embedded capilaries which when wet (filled with water) allow for nearly unimpeded transport of water, but when these capilaries dry out, their diameter constricts so that nothing gets through (even helium).

    So to contrast, the "tubes" are not rigid and the walls are not so "smooth" in this case, the "tubes" are sort of like chinese finger puzzles. When filled with water, allow water to pass easily, but when you try to pull the last bit of water out of them, the diameter constricts and nothing can get past.. Well maybe the chinese finger puzzle analogy was a bad one, but I couldn't think of anything else...

  15. Helium by TuringCheck · · Score: 4, Informative
    Actually the helium atom is the smallest possible molecule. The hidrogen atom is smaller but it forms H2 molecules which are much larger than a single atom, even if much lighter.

    Gaseous helium difuses through pretty much everything. These graphene membranes should have truly amazing properties.

    Armies of physicists will work years to explain such remarkable phenomenons. Neutrinos light than faster like just.

  16. Re:Does this mean... by Khyber · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oxygen being in the center of a water molecule pretty much makes it larger than helium in ALL directions.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  17. Re:Hydrogen by Patch86 · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to TFA (well, the BBC article on the same subject, anyway) it blocks helium molecules with what appears to be 100% efficiency. Helium molecules are smaller than the molecules in a standing mass of hydrogen, since hydrogen atoms bond together to form H2.