Slashdot Mirror


The Hi-Tech Security at the Super Bowl

Hugh Pickens writes "As millions of fans sit glued to their sets next Sunday, one part of the game they will not see is the massive deployment of federal and local law enforcement resources to achieve what is being called the most technologically secure Super Bowl in history, an event that has been officially designated as a National Security Special Event (PDF). At the top of the list are gamma-ray cargo and vehicles scanners that can reportedly see through six inches of steel to reveal the contents of large vehicles. 'We can detect people, handguns and rifles,' says Customs and Border Protection Officer Brian Bell. 'You'd be a fool to bring something into that stadium that you shouldn't. We're going to catch it. Our goal is to look at every vehicle that makes a delivery inside the stadium and inside the secure perimeter.' Next is the 51-foot Featherlite mobile command center for disaster response that will support the newly constructed $18 million Regional Operations Center (ROC) for the Marion County Department of Homeland Security that will serve as a fusion center for coordinating the various federal agencies involved in providing security for the Super Bowl. One interesting security measure are the 'Swiveloc' explosion-proof manhole covers (video) that Indianapolis has spent $150,000 installing that are locked down during the Super Bowl. In case of an underground explosion, the covers lift a couple of inches off the ground — enough to vent gas out without feeding in oxygen to make an explosion bigger — before falling back into place. Finally the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI has installed a network of cameras that will be just a click away for government officials. 'If you had the right (Internet) address, you could set up a laptop anywhere and you could watch the camera from there,' says Brigadier General Stewart Goodwin."

9 of 265 comments (clear)

  1. Meanwhile... by omganton · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...budget cuts to space exploration. Good thing Football is safe.

    1. Re:Meanwhile... by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Insightful

      its about protecting people if anything

      It's about fearmongering and harassing red-blooded law-abiding citizens, conditioning them to accept government intrusion into their lives, and making work for low-rent thugs while scores of teachers are being laid off.

      You are the one who's trolling. Since when in history has an American football game ever been subject to a terrorist attack? Note: a drunken fan who throws a plastic cup of beer at a rival team's fan is not a "lone wolf" terrorist no matter what the government tells you.

    2. Re:Meanwhile... by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If the NFL feels its a target, then the fucking NFL can pay the bill.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Meanwhile... by Seumas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It isn't a war on Osama. It's war (well, not actual war as we haven't had one since WWII) on terror. As soon as terror signs a peace treaty with us and surrenders, we'll get back to all that stupid freedom garbage. Any day now, surely. Pick an enemy that you can fight indefinitely and have all the time in the world to shape the country as you see fit under the threat of "terror".

  2. Re:The FBI webcam network by Swanktastic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Brigadier General Stewart "Bareback" Goodwin

  3. The manhole covers weren't for the stupidbowl. by mrmeval · · Score: 5, Informative

    They were because they KEEP EXPLODING!!!

    http://www.theindychannel.com/news/29819089/detail.html

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  4. Re:Fear by FridayBob · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know the terrorists have won when...

    Also:

    You know the establishment is winning when they've succeeded in using the fear of terrorism as an excuse to create the foundations of a police state...

  5. Re:Problem with dollar values. by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem with numbers is that you're assigning them to a single arbitrary time period. The correct way of saying that would to spend $38b on ensuring those very people are safe at all times in all parts of their lives.

    If a hypothetical super bowl bombing doesn't occur then statistically several of your 10k people won't live to the end of the year anyway due to other problems. We spend ludicrous amounts of money against an unknown and unpredictable threat that is likely to affect only a minuscule percentage of our population, and given the current state of security is likely to remain a threat despite everyone's best efforts. All the while we can clearly see statistically people die every year and they don't get a dime spent on them.

    Take the $38bn and put it into some basic healthcare if you want return on investment, not fighting the maybe terrorists.

  6. Re:One question by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Funny

    No dude, sports are named after what they do the least during the game.

    Basket Ball - The ball is in the basket for only a very small portion of the game.
    Base Ball - The ball touches the base for only a very small portion of the game.
    Foot Ball - The ball touches the foot for only a very small portion of the game.

    Hand Egg would following this convention be Soccer, and only for the very short period of time where one team picks a fight with Manchester United and some poor striker ends up getting punched in the eggs.