Slashdot Mirror


Craigslist Donates $100,000 To the Perl Foundation

mikejuk writes "The craigslist Charitable Fund has donated $100,000 to the Perl community for Perl5 maintenance and general use by the Perl Foundation. Craigslist gets more than 30 billion views per month and it is mostly written in Perl. The entire architecture of the system is open source — a proxy array based on Perl and memcache and a backend provided by Apache, memcache, MySQL and, of course, Perl. This is a successful enterprise giving something back to open source — which is how it should be."

5 of 99 comments (clear)

  1. Good on them by zakkie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Nice from the Craigslist folks. Aren't they eBay-owned though? Anyway, good to see perl getting some loving for a change.

    1. Re:Good on them by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In 2004, eBay bought a 25% share of Craigslist and is one of three major board members. Newmark is believed to own the largest share.

      In 2008, eBay sued Craigslist for "diluting its financial investment" - Craigslist countersued a month later.

      Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craigslist#Financials_and_ownership

      As far as I'm concerned, Craigslist is doing everything right compared to eBay. Site is simple, fast and easy to use. Craigslist doesn't try to take a cut from the little guy. They have enough oversight to keep it from becoming spammy and to avoid legal hassles, but otherwise leaves it up to the Users.

      Is the Craigslist Charitable Fund that donated to the Perl Foundation the same as the Craigslist Foundation?

    2. Re:Good on them by rudy_wayne · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7399720.stm

      "EBay acquired a 28.4% stake when it bought shares from a former employee who had been given equity by Mr Newmark.
      A year after the deal was completed, eBay, which had said it wanted to learn from Craigslist, started Kijiji.com, a rival international network of classified ad sites that now sells ads in all 50 US states. "

  2. Re:Successful ? by malilo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Troll much? You can always tell a made-up complaint because it describes a situation nothing like reality, and has a tone of venomous contempt that is excessive given the situation. People with no money to buy the item? Ok, maybe some people low-ball you but I have found that is easily curtailed by stating. "SERIOUSLY NO LOW-BALL OFFERS PRICE FIRM" on the ad. As for scams I get about 5% spam response rate on most things. They are super-obvious. Guess what. I click delete. I also get several offer emails usually and can only sell to one person! OMG, the horrors of selling something for free.

    --
    "sometimes he felt that his whole life was a dream, and he wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it."
  3. Re:Is PERL still active by ThePhilips · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In its hay days during the Late 90's and Early 2000's there was a lot of PERL Development, but it seems it has dropped off and PERL lost its shine.

    Frankly, Perl got it all more or less right already in early 2000s. So obviously there is not much development happening: Perl already works pretty well. Most new releases have mostly bug fixes - but also some minor syntax improvements and features from the Perl6.

    IOW, Perl lost its shine only in the eyes of those who are after shiny. Perl is pretty down to earth tool to get the job done.

    But back in the day every time you tried to find an open source program to do something it required PERL

    Perl defines portability properly and allows one to access quite a lot of system-specific resources - in the system-specific way. Thus it was (and in some areas still is) quite popular as the language for install scripts of all sorts.

    Even now, Perl remains one of the few power tools to be most commonly included in the fresh UNIX system installs (including Debian and Mac OS X). There is no other language/tool which is as stable and as portable: that's why it is possible and useful to include it into the OS install.

    Not so much of this any more, is it because I have changed how I look for software or is it because PERL is no longer as popular as it was before.

    IMO, Perl greatest weakness is the interface to other libraries (the PerlXS). It is not an easy task to make a Perl binding. It's fscking hard and includes lots of copy-paste. That's why Perl lacks many up-to-date bindings to many up-to-date libraries, what makes it not so suitable for many up-to-date tasks. Even Perl6 went on and pretty much excluded the XS/etc from the spec. What sucks and makes Perl6 worse (and useless to me) than the Perl5, because on top of general problem with bindings, Perl6 adds fragmentation: extensions written for different Perl6 implementation are incompatible with each other.

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.