Slashdot Mirror


Indian Court Orders Google To Remove Content

itwbennett writes "A Court in Delhi, India has ordered Google to remove content that 'is said to mock gods worshipped in India,' according to an IDG News Service report. Mufti Ajiaz Arshad Qasmi, a private citizen, 'had filed a civil suit against Google and other Internet companies including Facebook, objecting to certain content on their websites.' While Google agreed to remove the content, citing a 'long-standing policy of responding to court orders,' other Internet companies named in the suit are likely to appeal."

5 of 477 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Reasonable decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "No person, no idea, and no religion deserves to be illegal to insult." --RMS

  2. Re:When does Religion Trump our Rights? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While we're at it, why don't we thank it for the Bush administration and it's stifling of scientific progress.

    You mean, by becoming the first Administration to provide federal funding for embryonic stem cell research?

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  3. Re:When does Religion Trump our Rights? by Baloroth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And we can thank science for WMDs, eugenics, pollution of the environment, human experimentation, and a list of other things far too long to put here.

    Or maybe we can just put the blame where it belongs, which is on the people who actually do these evils and use science or religion as cover

    --
    "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
  4. Re:Reasonable decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This. I am a deeply religious person, and sometimes offended by the insults of unbelievers, but I will defend to the death their right to insult.

  5. Re:Reasonable decision by wed128 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A party should have a right to discuss such a law; it's that discussion that's being defended, not the law itself.