Slashdot Mirror
IBM Seeks Patent On Judging Programmers By Commits
theodp writes "How'd you like to be deemed unworthy of a job based upon a scan of your GitHub updates? That's what proposed in a newly-published IBM patent application for Automated Analysis of Code Developer's Profile, which proposes weeding out developer candidates for certain roles based on things like the amount of changes one typically makes with each commit, how frequently and regularly one makes commits, what hours of the day one makes commits, the percentage of commits with conflicts that one resolves, and the 'depth' of one's commit comments ('shallow', 'mid-range' or 'deep'). Big Blue explains that commit or repository interactions can be used to produce a 'conclusion report' that compares a developer to others who have profiles on the repository, which helps management 'avoid wasted time with ineffective developers."
They're both full of people who are afraid to commit.
Let IBM have the patents that way no other vendor will add theses to thier products.
"which helps management 'avoid wasted time with ineffective developers.'"
Does it also help developers avoid wasting time with ineffective management who use stupid metrics?
Business methods are NOT inventions, they do NOT advance the sciences or useful arts, and SHOULD NOT BE PATENTABLE!
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
"IBM Seeks Patent On Poor Management"
...They used to judge programmers on the number of lines of code generated rather then on the efficiency of said code.
They had to change their metric, or programmers would stop using loops in order to get a raise.
If only they
had patented
the metric
for judging
code by
number of
lines written/
changed/
updated
.