Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Successful Test Flight and Landing for Xombie Rocket Lander and GENIE

Posted by Soulskill on from the rises-from-the-dead-and-then-lands-gently-on-the-living dept.

An anonymous reader sends word that Masten Space Systems' Xombie rocket has successfully demonstrated vertical takeoff and landing for NASA's Flight Opportunities Program. It was guided autonomously by the GENIE system from Draper Laboratory. "The rocket rose 164 feet, moved laterally 164 feet, and then landed on another pad after a 67-second flight. The flight represents the first step in developing a test bed capability that will allow for landing demonstrations that start at much higher altitudes-several miles above the ground." This navigation technology is laying the groundwork for future exploration of planets, moons, and asteroids.

10 of 65 comments (clear)

  1. Lunar Lander by mutherhacker · · Score: 5, Funny

    I barely held back from pressing the UP arrow on the keyboard while watching the video.

  2. Lunar Lander game by roger_pasky · · Score: 2

    I used to play an ancient video game called "Lunar Lander" (less famous than Asteroids) where you had to manually do what computer controls right now without blinking. One less game to play with.

  3. meme in 3.... 2.... 1.... by ThreeGigs · · Score: 2

    I, for one, will welcome our new Xombie overlords in 3... 2... 1....

    1. Re:meme in 3.... 2.... 1.... by martin-boundary · · Score: 2

      I, for one, will welcome our new Xombie overlords in 3... 2... 1....

      BraaaainX... BraaaainX... BraaaainX... 3... 2... 1... BraaaainX (*)

      (*) Xombie language translation of your pledge, as a courtesy to our Xombie overlord guests.

  4. 164 feet? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just 1.28 cm more and it would have been 50 meters exactly. What a coincidence. You might almost think they had gone metric.

    I see they'll be missing planets again in the future.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:164 feet? by arielCo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just 1.28 cm more and it would have been 50 meters exactly. What a coincidence. You might almost think they had gone metric.

      They have. You're seeing the rounded number. https://www.google.com/search?q=50+meter+in+feet = 164.041995 feet (164 feet ½ inches)

      I see they'll be missing planets again in the future.

      Yeah, imperial bad metric good. But the NASA of yore somehow hit the Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, etc etc using teh evul miles and pounds-force. Maybe it has to do with _mixing_ units between suppliers and integrator without proper communication?

      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
    2. Re:164 feet? by tomhath · · Score: 4, Funny

      The vehicle reached an altitude of 0.248548477 furlongs in roughly 2.48015873 × 10-5 fortnights

    3. Re:164 feet? by dutchd00d · · Score: 2

      Just 1.28 cm more

      That's half an inch, you insensitive clod.

  5. DC/X (Delta Clipper) did that first 20 years ago by SysKoll · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Delta Clipper (DC/X) performed the very same stunt back in the 90s: Take off and land on its rocket. That was 20 years ago.

    The DC/X was a demonstrator of a single-stage-to-orbit project. It promised to bring down the cost of space flight by an order of magnitude and make the Space Shuttle obsolete.

    It flew several times, achieving perfect flights, then was given to NASA. They "acccidentally" forgot to connect the hydraulic line that deployed on of the landing struts and the DC/X crashed at its first NASA landing. And oh darn, they couldn't find the couple of millions needed to fix it.

    This dangerous competitor to the shuttle was thus killed. The Shuttle program was safe. Whew.

    Now that the Shuttle is no more, revolutionary concepts such as DC/X or its Xombie imitation might safely crawl out of the hole in which NASA had thrown them. Maybe.

    The first rule of a bureaucracy is self-perpetuation. The fact that a bureaucracy is building space shuttles doesn't change its bureaucratic nature.

    --

    --
    Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

  6. Re:DC/X (Delta Clipper) did that first 20 years ag by billybob_jcv · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First flight of the Shuttle: 1981
    First flight of DC/X: 1993

    I don't disagree that the DC/X was killed by NASA jealousy and incompetence - but the shuttle was a mature production program by the time DC/X was testing. No one had money for aerospace in the mid 1990s - both military and civilian programs were being canceled left & right.

    I applaud ANY project that is successful at ANY aerospace related engineering. Anything is better than giving the money to 3rd world despots & domestic leeches.